ECT MAD error #433: That Israel was offered a restored state

I

Interplanner

Well-known member
Danoh said:
Never mind your own duplicity, ay IP :chuckle:
Click to expand...


You can check, but I believe you will find I called the proposition stupid or nonsense or idiotic. Not the person. If so, yes, I was wrong to do so.

RD regularly called me stupid and perhaps an idiot, and he meant me, he is unable to break down a proposition and question details.
 
patrick jane

patrick jane

BANNED
Banned
Interplanner said:
You can check, but I believe you will find I called the proposition stupid or nonsense or idiotic. Not the person. If so, yes, I was wrong to do so.

RD regularly called me stupid and perhaps an idiot, and he meant me, he is unable to break down a proposition and question details.
Click to expand...
You're stuck on Israel
 
D

Danoh

New member
Interplanner said:
You can check, but I believe you will find I called the proposition stupid or nonsense or idiotic. Not the person. If so, yes, I was wrong to do so.

RD regularly called me stupid and perhaps an idiot, and he meant me, he is unable to break down a proposition and question details.
Click to expand...

Not that it justifies your person itself being derided - which is uncalled for...

At the same time; you also often deride the person of the Dispensationalist himself.

In this, you are just a milder version of Tet, may he nevertheless; be well.
 
I

Interplanner

Well-known member
Danoh said:
Not that it justifies your person itself being derided - which is uncalled for...

At the same time; you also often deride the person of the Dispensationalist himself.

In this, you are just a milder version of Tet, may he nevertheless; be well.
Click to expand...


Please do call me on it if it is a person, not a proposition being attacked. Obviously a bundle of propositions that are D'ist is a D'ist but means the bundle.
 
Right Divider

Right Divider

Body part
Interplanner said:
What exactly? I don't know one thing here that is not there in the text. And, opinion is only wrong if it is not adhering closely; you have opinions too, so don't put yourself on a pedestal so easily.

Are you are aware of how "the Servant" takes over things in Is 40-66?

What is the veil Paul is talking about in 2 Cor 3-5, and how could it be anything other than thinking all this (material in Isaiah) is not about Christ--the way he does in gobs of quotes?
Click to expand...
Once AGAIN, quote SPECIFIC verses/passages that PROVE your point. Quit with the vague personal commentary.
 
Right Divider

Right Divider

Body part
Interplanner said:
You can check, but I believe you will find I called the proposition stupid or nonsense or idiotic. Not the person. If so, yes, I was wrong to do so.

RD regularly called me stupid and perhaps an idiot, and he meant me, he is unable to break down a proposition and question details.
Click to expand...
It is YOU that has a problem in this sense.
 
Last edited:
I

Interplanner

Well-known member
Right Divider said:
Yes, he likes to blast out a 26 chapter quote-less "quote".
Click to expand...



Not everything in 26 needs to be repeated. I have gone over 'worshipping day and night to see hope fulfilled' and 'I will not go beyond what Moses and Prophets have said' HUNDREDS OF TIMES. You shouldn't be here if you are not going to pay attention. That's not my fault.
 
I

Interplanner

Well-known member
Right Divider said:
Once AGAIN, quote SPECIFIC verses/passages that PROVE your point. Quit with the vague personal commentary.
Click to expand...


I gave you an essay on several features of 40-66. None of it is vague, thank you. It is simply not what 2P2Ps have been taught to hear and repeat. There are some 25 exact uses of ch 60+ in the NT. Are you consistent with them? How?
 
Right Divider

Right Divider

Body part
Interplanner said:
Not everything in 26 needs to be repeated.
Click to expand...
I agree! That why I'm asking you to quote SPECIFIC verses/passages INSTEAD of 26 CHAPTERS!

Interplanner said:
I have gone over 'worshipping day and night to see hope fulfilled' and 'I will not go beyond what Moses and Prophets have said' HUNDREDS OF TIMES. You shouldn't be here if you are not going to pay attention. That's not my fault.
Click to expand...
The lack of communication here is COMPLETELY on YOUR side. Most here understand me just fine, it is YOU that we have trouble with.
 
D

Danoh

New member
Interplanner said:
I gave you an essay on several features of 40-66. None of it is vague, thank you. It is simply not what 2P2Ps have been taught to hear and repeat. There are some 25 exact uses of ch 60+ in the NT. Are you consistent with them? How?
Click to expand...

I'll give you this much, IP - those two, back to back posts were two very good, chockful of much info and equal amounts of great nuance...summaries of your view, bro.

Good job.

Nevertheless, they were of YOUR view.

YOUR more or less, Partial Preterist view within the Reformed School...view.

No thanks.

You have yet to prove you even understand Mid-Acts.

Let alone, disprove even one Mid-Acts assertion.

Thanks for your effort...but no cigar, bro.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top