Good catch....this is from another thread where Elo claims he can be physically "aroused" by a woman other than his wife, and it isn't a sin...it isn't lusting.
:shocked:
Good catch....this is from another thread where Elo claims he can be physically "aroused" by a woman other than his wife, and it isn't a sin...it isn't lusting.
In regards to Matthew 5:27-28, what else could it mean other than sexual lust i.e. attraction? The use of the word "adultery" gives the meaning away immediately.
Is it natural for a single man to have a sexual attraction for a single woman? Yes! That sexual attraction (along with other very important things such as friendship, love, respect, etc.) leads to God's design for human sexuality: marriage.
Just out of curiosity elohiym, is the purpose behind this thread to legitimize all loving sexual relationships as long as coveting/lust isn't involved?
And when I say "all", based on dealing with you under the username of Doormat, you know what I'm referring to.
Good catch....this is from another thread where Elo claims he can be physically "aroused" by a woman other than his wife, and it isn't a sin...it isn't lusting.
But even if one covets his neighbor's wife for her money, which happens, it's still adultery in one's heart, right?
I agree, and wouldn't call that lust.
Being attracted to someone of the opposite sex whether you're married or not is not unnatural. If you're married and the attraction is towards a woman other than your wife, it's how we deal with that attraction that matters (stay away from that woman, build a stronger relationship with your wife, pray to God to give you strength to take those immoral desires away, etc.).
Gold diggers come in both genders.
Being attracted to someone of the opposite sex whether you're married or not is not unnatural. If you're married and the attraction is towards a woman other than your wife, it's how we deal with that attraction that matters (stay away from that woman, build a stronger relationship with your wife, pray to God to give you strength to take those immoral desires away, etc.).
This is pretty much my view.
But even if one covets his neighbor's wife for her money, which happens, it's still adultery in one's heart, right?
I agree, and wouldn't call that lust.
This is pretty much my view.
elohiym said:Lusting is coveting, according to the Bible. It is not being sexually aroused by the opposite sex. If I covet another man's wife, I'm an adulterer. If I find her attractive, I've done nothing wrong. If I become aroused, I've done nothing wrong. If I desire to have her in spite of her husband, it's lusting (coveting) and adultery whether I think it or do it. You are trying to make normal sexual attraction between the sexes immoral and calling it "lust."
This is pretty much my view.
To enlarge upon this - I've read that just pheromones create a certain level of arousal and hormonal response. And pheromones are completely outside the conscious mind. You might not even know what was arousing you if you did not see or hear the source.
And arousal is not just a physiological response, but it's interesting that in men and women (moreso with women) physical arousal may go unnoticed.
Likewise, one may rate the opposite sex very highly in attractiveness, but due to a lack of sex drive not have a physiological reaction.
Bottom line, I don't think that sexual dysfunction prevents the sin of lust, nor does it make a human more holy to lack physical responsiveness.
To enlarge upon this - I've read that just pheromones create a certain level of arousal and hormonal response. And pheromones are completely outside the conscious mind. You might not even know what was arousing you if you did not see or hear the source.
And arousal is not just limited to a physiological response, but it's interesting that in men and women (moreso with women) physical arousal may go unnoticed.
Likewise, one may rate the opposite sex very highly in attractiveness, but due to a lack of sex drive not have a physiological reaction.
Bottom line, I don't think that sexual dysfunction prevents the sin of lust, nor does it make a human more holy to lack physical responsiveness.
Are you two in different parts of the house on TOL ?
To enlarge upon this - I've read that just pheromones create a certain level of arousal and hormonal response. And pheromones are completely outside the conscious mind. You might not even know what was arousing you if you did not see or hear the source.
And arousal is not just limited to a physiological response, but it's interesting that in men and women (moreso with women) physical arousal may go unnoticed.
Likewise, one may rate the opposite sex very highly in attractiveness, but due to a lack of sex drive not have a physiological reaction.
Bottom line, I don't think that sexual dysfunction prevents the sin of lust, nor does it make a human more holy to lack physical responsiveness.
Can a person commit adultery without having a sexual thought?