Yes, because her and her 4th husband believe in the sanctity of marriage.
Leave off the low shots mate...she is a recent convert
Yes, because her and her 4th husband believe in the sanctity of marriage.
People do have concerns of conscience.
Yes, because her and her 4th husband believe in the sanctity of marriage.
She has put forward a reasonable compromise in asking for her name to be removed from the licence, which shows a willingness to accommodate...let the other side also be willing to reach an accommodation and we have a solution
That is not the concern of this thread.
You feel free to cast a stone?
If in January when the judiciary meets to make a ruling, they decide to make an accommodation to Christians on the grounds of freedom of conscience how will this ruling effect Christian bakers who do not wish to decorate a cake in a way that promotes homosexuality? Christian booksellers who do not wish to supply people with what they believe to be ungodly literary matter? Christian hoteliers who do not wish to let out rooms for the purpose of homosexual activity, Christian adoption agencies who do not wish to procure children for same sex couples?
I don't think anyone should have to make a compromise in order for her to do her job.
That is not the concern of this thread.
You feel free to cast a stone?
A bookstore can refuse to sell dirty books? A used bookstore may refuse to buy dirty books?
A grocer, here, can refuse to sell alcohol.
Why is it not mandatory because the dirty book readers and boozers are being discriminated against. Are boozers and dirty book reader more disturbing to the moral conscience than homos?
Well I sure do. She's a showboating grandstanding pot disturber, her personal life's a mess, and she's in no position whatsoever to lecture anyone about the "sanctity" of marriage. Unless her intention was proving it was good and sacred four times.
This bureaucrat's conversion to Christianity doesn't give her a blank check.
Your position is of having no qualms about consenting to immorality, Christians hold a different view.
Here is my perspective
I worked as a receptionist of a hotel, they all knew I was a Christian.
Now the barman and the manager ganged up and went to the boss and said I should help in the bar when it was busy...they both were homos, which you might say is beside the point...but they pursue Christians...they are the aggressors.
I said to the boss that I was willing to collect empty glasses and bottles and clear tables which would be a massive help in busy times but I would in no circumstance serve alcohol.
...or else I would accept demotion to the kitchen. The boss who was Jewish accepted the compromise...but it caused just the same stink as Kim is causing on a much smaller scale.
They changed the conditions of her job in a way that touched upon a matter of conscience.
Businesses change from within all the time, depending on the need and circumstances. That includes cutting job positions, adding job positions or changing job positions.
I have been on jobs where my position was changed because of changes within the company which meant I ended up with duties that were recently done by a select few, upper level employees. Several of us did.
There was no whining or complaining. We adjusted or looked elsewhere. Either all employees should have the right to make up their own duties or none should. Which is it?
Because nothing touched upon an issue of conscience...it seems a small thing to you, well it is not a small matter to us.
A bookstore can refuse to sell dirty books? A used bookstore may refuse to buy dirty books?
A grocer, here, can refuse to sell alcohol.
Why is it not mandatory because the dirty book readers and boozers are being discriminated against. Are boozers and dirty book reader more disturbing to the moral conscience than homos?
If in January when the judiciary meets to make a ruling, they decide to make an accommodation to Christians on the grounds of freedom of conscience how will this ruling effect Christian bakers who do not wish to decorate a cake in a way that promotes homosexuality? Christian booksellers who do not wish to supply people with what they believe to be ungodly literary matter? Christian hoteliers who do not wish to let out rooms for the purpose of homosexual activity, Christian adoption agencies who do not wish to procure children for same sex couples?
Ah, that's the problem. I forget now and then to check where someone is from, because laws and foundations can differ. Here that couldn't happen. Things are a little different across the pond, sadly.I can assure you it has happened, and I can assure you that Christian bookstores like "Send the Light" have vanished from Britain's high streets. You can't find a Christian book store anymore.
True, but that's not how she sold her part when she spoke of the decision. She couched it in a different impression, saying that as the daughter of a preacher it was one of the most difficult decisions she's had to make.Leave off the low shots mate...she is a recent convert
http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2015/09/kentucky_clerk_kim_davis_appea.htmlAh, that's the problem. I forget now and then to check where someone is from, because laws and foundations can differ. Here that couldn't happen. Things are a little different across the pond, sadly.
True, but that's not how she sold her part when she spoke of the decision. She couched it in a different impression, saying that as the daughter of a preacher it was one of the most difficult decisions she's had to make.
2:52 p.m. From AP: Deputy clerk Melissa Thompson told U.S. District Judge David Bunning that she doesn't really want to, but she will comply with the law.
She wept and said: "I'm a preacher's daughter, and this is the hardest thing I've ever had to do in my life."
boozers and dirty book readers are not recognized as "minorities"
yet
You're right. It got squeezed into a story on her without proper attribution. Thanks for the correction. :thumb:Thats false, wherever you got that, they didnt know what they were talking about, the daughter of a preacher comment came from a different clerk in Kims office, a clerk named melissa.