I ignore you now because all you do is accuse, accuse, accuse, and lie, lie, lie, and all that you only do in hopes of getting a response worthy of reporting so that you can either get a thread you do not like shut down or get someone you hate banned. You are a typical closet psychopath just like your pal Evil.Eye.
JESUS IS NOT YHWH
- Thread starter KingdomRose
- Start date
- Status
I ignore you now because all you do is accuse, accuse, accuse, and lie, lie, lie, and all that you only do in hopes of getting a response worthy of reporting so that you can either get a thread you do not like shut down or get someone you hate banned. You are a typical closet psychopath just like your pal Evil.Eye.
Lon
Well-known member
Again, nailing your 1 (one) thesis on the Wittenberg door, but NOT Dr. Martin Luther.
lain: Daqq-who? :idunno: By the numbers --> 600 Million s. About 1 million are not triune. The Samaritans, a small group, were wrong according to the Lord Jesus Christ. You play the numbers, JW's and Unitarians lose. You place scriptures and Unitarians lose.
Blind-Pharisee is nowhere near as bad as blind-Samaritan. The Lord Jesus Christ said so. "We Jews know what we speak."
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
Except when they fail they fail big time.
81 % miss a 50/50
King James Version
(And they said unto him, Lord, he hath ten pounds.)
Genesis 22
12* Abraham bowed before the Hittite people.
13* Abraham said to Ephron before all the people, "But I want to pay you the full price for the field. Accept my money, and I will bury my dead."
14* Ephron answered Abraham,
15* "Sir, listen to me. 10 pounds[129] of silver means nothing to you and me! Take the land, and bury your dead wife."
16* Abraham understood that Ephron was telling him the price of the land.[130] So Abraham paid him for the land. Abraham weighed 10 pounds[131] of silver for Ephron and gave it to the merchant.[132]
17* 18* So the field of Ephron changed owners. This field was in Machpelah, east of Mamre. Abraham became the owner of the field, the cave on the field, and all the trees that were on that field. All the people in the city saw the agreement between Ephron and Abraham.
19* After this, Abraham buried Sarah his wife in the cave of that field near Mamre (Hebron) in the land of Canaan.
20* Abraham bought the field and the cave on it from the Hittite people. This became his property, and he used it as a burying place.
Last edited:
Lon
Well-known member
True, but statistically, they ARE right most of the time. Add about 10million of these debates and the statistics prove true after the 10millionth show.
Look... I've read and "understand" the ... "apocrypha" ... Enoch is quoted in Jude to a degree... but actually... it trails off in a way that contradicts much found in scripture and actually points to the "Sex with Satan" teaching found in Mystical Judahic teachings.
It's way off point... and actually seems to be quoting a writing that we have lost in a way that binds it as "partial truth".
The dark voice is the absence of the "Holy Spirit" in Daqq's writings. I'm not damning Daqq or saying I have the authority to say "he is void of the HS"... but I can damn sure assure you that his writing and doctrine is.
- EE
Jude quoted "something"... but the "book of Enoch" is not the true work that he quoted... the "book of Enoch... quoted a portion of what the book of Enoch "quotes" in it's first chapter... but the book of Enoch ain't Cannon, nor should it be. That is the consensus of so many historians, archaeologists and religion professors... Atheist, Arian and Trinitarian alike... that you are a fool to even suggest otherwise.
See [MENTION=15579]1Mind1Spirit[/MENTION] ... I don't have to point out that your understanding of the words where Daqq mocks the virgin birth are about "inner struggle"... are a "misunderstanding' of Daqq's intent.
He just gave the words context... and sorry sir... He has proven to be Mocking Christ and the unity of the Flesh and Spirit... far beyond the "Adoption" theory.
Daqqtic 3 and 4 ... plus the unwritten 7th ... (Victim Card)
http://theologyonline.com/showthread.php?124930-JESUS-IS-NOT-YHWH&p=5032045&viewfull=1#post5032045
Most all of the book of 1Enoch has now been found at Qumran and is dated to about 100BC. I thought you were so up on Qumran texts? What happened? Didn't you just quote a Qumran text to support your theory from Isaiah 9:6? How can you be so hypocritical and not even see your own hypocrisy, dear Pharisee?
Most all of the book of 1Enoch has now been found at Qumran and is dated to about 100BC. I thought you were so up on Qumran texts? What happened? Didn't you just quote a Qumran text to support your theory from Isaiah 9:6? How can you be so hypocritical and not even see your own hypocrisy, dear Pharisee?
What was sacred and what was profane were separated in the temple. It is clear that the "jars" can contain false books and true books.
The Great Isaiah Scroll dates back to at least... 150BC ... incidentally ... the only reason you are trying to discredit what is being said is to deny "Atonement" and "The Binding of Thee ONE God to Human Flesh"... in Jesus Christ.
You're a lot of stale air and repetition.
P.s. The Pharisee's denied His deity as well. Not all of them... but most of them... and... Jesus called them "Serpents" for it. He also called those that teach the Law... "As you teach it"... serpents.
On this note... Jesus taught that we "Cannot" keep the LAW and ONLY GOD IS GOOD.
Are you savvy on the "GOOD SHEPHERD" Daqqie?
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
I'm purdy shore you and Lon threw the first punches.:juggle:
You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. The same people who promote such nonsense also get their corrupt flesh-minded perverted sexual ideas straight out of Genesis 6. Moses as well as Isaiah also quote from 1Enoch, as well as there being some places in the Gospel accounts that appear to be quite clear references to the book of 1Enoch. You are trapped in your own prison house, just as Messiah warns you about, and even as I have already quoted some of those words herein to you. Your dungeon is your own carcass brought on by your own flesh mindset; that is your own cave, your own broken cistern which can hold no water of the Word, which you yourself have carved out from yourself, and your own whitewashed sepulcher, of your own doing, just as the Prophets and the Master also warned you about.
[MENTION=17195]daqq[/MENTION] ... I'm re-posting this.... because you need to see it too and I have linked previous material in it. It's fully edited now.
I said I would essentially bury anyone that defended Daqq on this matter. You are the one person that I have a "soft spot" for that would do so and thus you are under "grace".
However... You falsified the intent of Daqq's Mocking the Virgin Birth... so I would say your witness is a little blown in the judgment of this matter.
You may want to put on your reading specs. I have mine on... and its not gelling.
Daqq needs to be afraid... every time he MOCKS the Divinity of Christ and the "Unity" of the Spirit and the Flesh.
You know what I speak of and I will link a post from you that I haven't forgotten...
Link and quote to come...
[MENTION=15579]1Mind1Spirit[/MENTION] ... you said this to [MENTION=7266]Zeke[/MENTION] ... HERE... Why do you refrain from saying this to [MENTION=17195]daqq[/MENTION] ... when he insinuates against your very words here repititiously and even lies about what he is saying... but goes on saying it?
1Mind1Spirit said:
Indeed the closet psychopath is the god in the machinations of his vain imagination.
I know exactly what the lore of Enoch says and I can assure you that Azazal is named as one of the Angels that lusted after human women... and essentially the leader of a great angelic revolt... in the lore of Enoch.
The actual cause of the "banishment" isn't fully known... but... the book of Enoch demonizes feminine beauty all together and makes sex a wicked practice.
That's pretty lame when God's first instructions were to "Be fruitful and multiply".
Go back to the books Junior.
Forgot to quote this?
"You are the one person that I have a "soft spot" for that would do so and thus you are under "grace"."
Intentional Repost...
I said I would essentially bury anyone that defended Daqq on this matter. You are the one person that I have a "soft spot" for that would do so and thus you are under "grace".
However... You falsified the intent of Daqq's Mocking the Virgin Birth... so I would say your witness is a little blown in the judgment of this matter.
You may want to put on your reading specs. I have mine on... and its not gelling.
Daqq needs to be afraid... every time he MOCKS the Divinity of Christ and the "Unity" of the Spirit and the Flesh.
You know what I speak of and I will link a post from you that I haven't forgotten...
Link and quote to come...
[MENTION=15579]1Mind1Spirit[/MENTION] ... you said this to [MENTION=7266]Zeke[/MENTION] ... HERE... Why do you refrain from saying this to [MENTION=17195]daqq[/MENTION] ... when he insinuates against your very words here repititiously and even lies about what he is saying... but goes on saying it?
[MENTION=17195]daqq[/MENTION] ... I'm re-posting this.... because you need to see it too and I have linked previous material in it. It's fully edited now.
I said I would essentially bury anyone that defended Daqq on this matter. You are the one person that I have a "soft spot" for that would do so and thus you are under "grace".
However... You falsified the intent of Daqq's Mocking the Virgin Birth... so I would say your witness is a little blown in the judgment of this matter.
You may want to put on your reading specs. I have mine on... and its not gelling.
Daqq needs to be afraid... every time he MOCKS the Divinity of Christ and the "Unity" of the Spirit and the Flesh.
You know what I speak of and I will link a post from you that I haven't forgotten...
Link and quote to come...
[MENTION=15579]1Mind1Spirit[/MENTION] ... you said this to [MENTION=7266]Zeke[/MENTION] ... HERE... Why do you refrain from saying this to [MENTION=17195]daqq[/MENTION] ... when he insinuates against your very words here repititiously and even lies about what he is saying... but goes on saying it?
1Mind1Spirit said:
You again reveal that you have no clue what the book of 1Enoch is about. As for "the lore of Enoch" I have never even heard of it and never referenced any such thing. As for myself I have done quite extensive studies on 1Enoch and there really is not anything that contradicts the current commonly held "canon" of the scripture, (if indeed you only understood the writings). The only portions of 1Enoch not found at Qumran are any portions from the section titled the Parables of Enoch. Fragments from all other sections have been found and catalogued, and they predate the advent of Messiah by at least an hundred years, and therefore Jude quotes from that book; there really is no doubt except in the minds of people who have long since created new anti-Semitic religions such as what you hold to. You are the worst of all replacement theology teachers in that you have replaced the Father YHWH with His Messiah-Word.
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
10His disciples said to Him, “If this is the case between a man and his wife, it is better not to marry.”
11“Not everyone can accept this word,” Jesus answered, “but only those to whom it has been given.…
This is not proof that Enoch is valid. I can blend pieces of truth into myths and call it SCRIPTURE. Or more to the point... you are saying that Jesus is referencing "Enoch" here... in some way... I believe because the "book of Enoch" states that Angels mustn't marry or have sex with "Humans" at the very least... anyhow...
You are taking "bits" of possible reference into a non-canonical book and blending them with the words of JESUS.
NOT COOL 1Mind! I still think your awesome... but this is a foolish argument and I'm not used to you communicating this way.
And back to the book of Enoch...
(Language warning) And yes... I'm calling the Book of Enoch "something in a guaranteed box"
Spoiler
- Status