There is more than one scripture that says Jesus is the almighty God.
Revelation 7:8 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.
You've quoted Rev 7:8 incorrectly, it mentions nothing about the A&O. I think you were meant to quote Rev 1:8.
The lord here refers to the Father NOT Jesus. In Rev 1:8 it mentions the alpha & omega (A&O) and identifies him with the same person as the "one who is, who was, and is coming",
“I am the Alʹpha and the O·meʹga,” says Jehovah God, “the One who is and who was and who is coming, the Almighty.” (Revelation 1:8). In Rev 1:4,5 it again mentions "one who is, who was, and is coming" and states the "seven spirits" are before
"his [the one who is, who was, and is coming] throne", it then goes on to show Jesus as a separate person from the "one who is, who was, and is coming" as you will see,
"May you have undeserved kindness and peace from “the One who is and who was and who is coming,” and from the seven spirits that are before his throne, 5 and from Jesus Christ". It is the "one who is, who was, and is coming" who sits on the throne and is the A&O, it is Jesus who takes the scroll from the
"one who sits on the throne". (Revelation 5:1,6,7) "And I saw in the right hand of the One seated on the throne a scroll...And I saw...a lamb..At once he [the lamb] came forward and took it out of the right hand of the One seated on the throne."
Jesus clearly isn't the one speaking in Rev 1:8, its the Father.
There is only one everlasting Father.
It is ignorant to claim Isaiah says Jesus will be called God, and Father, and Counselor, but not the same names that are about God the Father. Jesus has other names of God the Father too, such as the Alpha and the Omega.
You've completely ignored what I said, again, Isaiah stated Jesus "will be called" and NOT "Jesus is called", if Jesus already was the eternal Father and Mighty God then the latter phrase would have been used, it was not. You are ignoring evidence. Moreover, Jesus does not have the title A&O, there is no text that states this.
You say Jesus has other expressions that are applied to the Father and that is true, but as I showed so do men. There are some expressions that are applied to the Father that are NEVER applied to Jesus, such as Sovereign Lord (Deut 3:23), almighty God (Exo 6:3), God of Gods (Joshua 22:22), True God (1 Kings 8:60), it a HUGE coincidence that all these titles are ultimate expression in the meanings and are NEVER applied to Jesus right.
Satan is NOT called the Alpha and the Omega, or the Savior, or the Redeemer, or the Everlasting Father, or the Almighty God. You need to stop yourself.
So WHAT, my point is still relevant, you tried to use the fact that Jesus was called God as proof that he is the one, God, I showed you how this alone is not proof that he is the "one God", this is a valid argument. It is bad form to insist a
specific point is incorrect in light of more evidence that is still being scrutinized as evidence that I'm incorrect.
That one God the Father is Jesus come in the flesh as a man.
How many times have you seen me make a statement without showing some type of evidence, THIS is exactly what I mean when I earlier said you assert things without evidence. Where is your evidence to accompany your claim? Again, it is pointless to keep asserting points are true when the evidence you have supplied is still undergoing scrutiny.
You try, but you can’t distort the truth and fool me.
Jesus is called the King of kings OF THE MEN OF THE EARTH.
So then, your reasoning is showed to be just more defiance from you of the Truth.
Revelation 1:5 and from Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, the firstborn from the dead, andthe ruler over the kings of the earth. To Him who loved us and washed us from our sins in His own blood,
Did you read that? Jesus is the RULER over the KINGS OF THE EARTH. He is the King of kings.
Now you should stop talking about Artaxerxes and Nebuchadnezzar
You misunderstand my point. You claim because Jesus and the Father have titles they are the same person. My claim is that just because two people have the same title it does not make them the same person. If there are two human kings on earth who are kings over kings they can BOTH be called "king of kings" simultaneously, if there are two men on earth who are Lord over lords they can BOTH be called lord of lords simultaneously. Likewise, if Jesus and the Father are two separate persons they can both be King of Kings and Lord of Lords without the need to assume they are one and the same. Jesus, as appointed by the Father, is a king of kings because the Father has given him that position. The Father as the "one God" and sovereign is a King of kings as he is the God of Jesus and source of all life.
My point is valid and still stands. Answer me, is it possible that two individuals exist on earth who are both referred to "king of kings" at the same time?