Is there a risk of death from the covid vaccine?

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
If there’s any health risk with the vaccine, @marke is being wise to exercise caution and loving to warn others. Why is that a problem? There is some risk, according to numerous doctors, according to the nature of the new technology, and according to reports of adverse reactions and death from the vaccines. The risk due to COVID is not much more than the risk of the vaccines, at this time. Wouldn’t you applaud marke for taking precautions for himself and warning others about COVID itself?
Do you ever actually respond to what was said to you or do you only ever find ways to repeat your position as though nothing has been said to refute it.

You have no reason to be scared of this vaccine. There is no scientific basis for your fear whatsoever, as has been demonstrated over and over against without substantive response from your throughout this entire thread. I'm done repeating it all. You know your position is ridiculous because you've seen the evidence against it and cannot refute any of it (if you could, wild horses couldn't drag you away from your computer before you did so). If the sort of "caution" you speak of was reasonable, you'd scream in terror if anyone ever suggested that you get into a car.

Clete

P.S. Derf, I just realized that you wrote that post and not marke. Sorry! I should have paid closer attention. That's what I get for trying to do this without sufficient time.
 
Last edited:

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
I don't think you missed anything. If you trust the vaccine then great. I don't, not because I have the hard numbers (although Way2go does have some great information), but because I've been lied to SO much by Fauci and the media that I can't trust the numbers they endorse. And the fear mongering, sheesh! Why, as liars, are they so insane about trying to have me get the jab? Don't they know it only hardens my heart against their command that I get it? Even so, I know I'm not at risk so it doesn't matter much in my case anyway. And when I look for specific numbers, they aren't available. For instance, they reported the number of delta variant cases were up - by percentage. Percentage ratio of what numbers? can't find them. What are the charts showing vaccination heavy areas and those that hardly vaccinated at all and their cases/deaths (and how are the cases determined?)? can't find those charts or numbers to make a chart with.

So, yeah, I'm just going to wait.
At least you're honest enough to say outloud that your decision isn't because of anything related to science. I don't blame you for not trusting the government. They've clearly earned everyone's distrust but there is still the fact that hundreds of millions of doses have been administered with statistically insignificant numbers of serious problems. Then there's also the results. The pandemic is effectively over here in the U.S. where the vaccine is easily available and has been widely distributed while other parts of the world are still on lock down, precisely because they do not have the access to the vaccine that we've had here.
 

Derf

Well-known member
Do you ever actually respond to what was said to you or do you only ever find ways to repeat your position as though nothing has been said to refute it.
I always respond to what was said, when it makes any sense to do so. But if there’s nothing substantive…(I was debating whether to respond to yours this time, but I’ll lower my standards this once.)

You have no reason to be scared of this vaccine.
Not scared of the vaccine.

There is no scientific basis for your fear whatsoever, as has been demonstrated over and over against without substantive response from your throughout this entire thread.
I am not looking for scientific basis for fear, but the same argument, if it could be called such, should be applied to the need for the vaccine as much or more than the vaccine itself.

I'm done repeating it all.
Thank goodness for that! (But why do I not believe you? Maybe it’s like how the WHO and CDC and MSM have been repeating the mantra about the virus, while hiding important information. They have destroyed their integrity, if they had any left.

If the sort of "caution" you speak of was reasonable, you'd scream in terror if anyone ever suggested that you get into a car.
Not scared of the vaccine, or cars. I am a little frightened of the drivers in both cases, however. And what are the drivers for the vaccine that require doctors to be silenced in their opposition? That require doctors not to treat patients according to their own wisdom and knowledge? That require a puppet president to be set up to further the “cause”? It’s bigger than just the vaccine, Clete.

P.S. Derf, I just realized that you wrote that post and not marke. Sorry! I should have paid closer attention. That's what I get for trying to do this without sufficient time.
No problem—this takes more time than I have to give, sometimes.

Derf
 

Yorzhik

Well-known member
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
At least you're honest enough to say outloud that your decision isn't because of anything related to science. I don't blame you for not trusting the government. They've clearly earned everyone's distrust but there is still the fact that hundreds of millions of doses have been administered with statistically insignificant numbers of serious problems. Then there's also the results. The pandemic is effectively over here in the U.S. where the vaccine is easily available and has been widely distributed while other parts of the world are still on lock down, precisely because they do not have the access to the vaccine that we've had here.
I dunno. Logic and reason are related to science and that's what I'm basing my decision on.

And to say that there won't be a statistically significant number of problems can't be known for some time.

And to say there are places that don't have the vaccine showing significant differences with places that do can't be based on lockdowns. Do you have the charts that show the numbers?
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
I dunno. Logic and reason are related to science and that's what I'm basing my decision on.
You surely could not have misunderstood my point.

Everything related to scientific iquirey into this vaccine supports its safety and effectiveness.

Your decision, based on your previous post, is based on political considerations, not scientific ones.
And to say that there won't be a statistically significant number of problems can't be known for some time.
Yes, actually, it can. We know how long the vaccine stays in your body (about a month) and we are already have a reasonable expectation for how long the resulting immunity will last.
And to say there are places that don't have the vaccine showing significant differences with places that do can't be based on lockdowns. Do you have the charts that show the numbers?
Did you seriously just suggest that lockdowns work? The lock downs did not do a thing to stop this virus and neither did wearing those ridiculous masks!

I'm done with showing people numbers. The numbers are EASY to find for anyone who wants to look for them and I have no confidence that a mountain of numbers would convince you of anything anyway. I mean, are you not living in this country right now? Have you not just lived your own life through all these waste of time lock downs, masks and social distancing that didn't do a single thing? Sheesh!
 

Yorzhik

Well-known member
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
You surely could not have misunderstood my point.
You certainly weren't clear at best. And to say I'm not basing my decision on science is more rhetoric than discussion.

I'm definitely basing my decision on science.

Everything related to scientific iquirey into this vaccine supports its safety and effectiveness.
On the short term. It can't be based on the long term, which is *important*, because a long term DOESN'T EXIST.

And since you admit we can't trust the government numbers, add least be wise enough to wait for independent numbers.

Your decision, based on your previous post, is based on political considerations, not scientific ones.
My post does not in any way imply that my decision is political. What politics are you talking about?

Yes, actually, it can. We know how long the vaccine stays in your body (about a month) and we are already have a reasonable expectation for how long the resulting immunity will last.
Not according to one of the founders of the mRNA methods. How the spike protein affects humans in the long term has already shown unexpected results.

It's you that won't look at any counter science. It's politics, right?

Did you seriously just suggest that lockdowns work? The lock downs did not do a thing to stop this virus and neither did wearing those ridiculous masks!
YOU are the one that said lockdowns show if vaccine works or not. Here is your quote: "The pandemic is effectively over here in the U.S. where the vaccine is easily available and has been widely distributed while other parts of the world are still on lock down, precisely because they do not have the access to the vaccine that we've had here."

I'm done with showing people numbers. The numbers are EASY to find for anyone who wants to look for them and I have no confidence that a mountain of numbers would convince you of anything anyway. I mean, are you not living in this country right now? Have you not just lived your own life through all these waste of time lock downs, masks and social distancing that didn't do a single thing? Sheesh!
No you haven't shown the numbers. There are no clear numbers, or charts, showing the rates of infection (and the method they used to determine infection) and the rates of death based on whether a location has or not had the vaccine. I for one would certainly change my mind based on the numbers but what we have so far supports my decision.
 
Last edited:

Gary K

New member
Banned
Citation for "Most serious problems with vaccines really begin to show up a year or more after vaccination."
Research vaccine development. There's a reason that it has historically taken one to two decades to develop a vaccine. If you're this ignorant of vaccine development you've no right to speak to anything about vaccines.
 

Gary K

New member
Banned
You certainly weren't clear at best. And to say I'm not basing my decision on science is more rhetoric than discussion.

I'm definitely basing my decision on science.


On the short term. It can't be based on the long term, which is *important*, because a long term DOESN'T EXIST.

And since you admit we can't trust the government numbers, add least be wise enough to wait for independent numbers.


My post does not in any way imply that my decision is political. What politics are you talking about?


Not according to one of the founders of the mRNA methods. How the spike protein affects humans in the long term has already shown unexpected results.

It's you that won't look at any counter science. It's politics, right?


YOU are the one that said lockdowns show if vaccine works or not. Here is your quote: "The pandemic is effectively over here in the U.S. where the vaccine is easily available and has been widely distributed while other parts of the world are still on lock down, precisely because they do not have the access to the vaccine that we've had here."


No you haven't shown the numbers. There are no clear numbers, or charts, showing the rates of infection (and the method they used to determine infection) and the rates of death based on whether a location has or not had the vaccine. I for one would certainly change my mind based on the numbers but what we have so far supports my decision.
Clete's post to you illustrates his utter ignorance. The very people who push vaccines on us are the same people who push masks and lockdowns. That he doesn't realize this more than a year after masks and lockdowns began being pushed on us says he's ignorant of the entire narrative of the pandemic.
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
YOU are the one that said lockdowns show if vaccine works or not. Here is your quote: "The pandemic is effectively over here in the U.S. where the vaccine is easily available and has been widely distributed while other parts of the world are still on lock down, precisely because they do not have the access to the vaccine that we've had here."
We are talking past one another and I no longer care about COVID enough to debate it any longer.

As for the above quote, I wasn't suggesting that other countries were still on lock down because lock downs work but because they don't have the vaccine. In other words, the vaccine obviously works. All you have to do is look at the numbers in the US which are down over 90%. The vaccine is the only thing that was ever going to work and it works beautifully and all one has to do is spend maybe 30 seconds to find the numbers to prove it. Those who don't believe it, don't want to believe it and won't ever believe it no matter what. Those countries that don't have the vaccine are still scared out of their rational minds over COVID and so they have to do something and the natural tendency of the left is command and control, therefore, lock downs are still in place in spite of an entire globe's worth of absolute proof that they did exactly nothing at all to help prevent the spread of the disease.
 

Gary K

New member
Banned
We are talking past one another and I no longer care about COVID enough to debate it any longer.

As for the above quote, I wasn't suggesting that other countries were still on lock down because lock downs work but because they don't have the vaccine. In other words, the vaccine obviously works. All you have to do is look at the numbers in the US which are down over 90%. The vaccine is the only thing that was ever going to work and it works beautifully and all one has to do is spend maybe 30 seconds to find the numbers to prove it. Those who don't believe it, don't want to believe it and won't ever believe it no matter what. Those countries that don't have the vaccine are still scared out of their rational minds over COVID and so they have to do something and the natural tendency of the left is command and control, therefore, lock downs are still in place in spite of an entire globe's worth of absolute proof that they did exactly nothing at all to help prevent the spread of the disease.
Right, Clete.

This is why Fauci and company are still promoting masks, lockdowns, and vaccines all at the same time. Seems the only people you will believe are those who have a financial conflict of interest where vaccines are concerned. Fauci is so conflicted he stands to make millions, hundreds of millions, of dollars from his associations with vaccine producers.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Seems the only people you will believe are those who have a financial conflict of interest where vaccines are concerned.
Ok genius, let's put your claims to the test. Give us your numbers. If these vaccines are so dangerous, how many people do you expect to fall seriously ill or die from these coronavirus vaccines in, say, the next year?

Give us a percentage. What percentage of those who received the vaccine will become seriously ill, and what percentage of people will die, as a direct consequence of Trump's vaccines?
 

Gary K

New member
Banned
Ok genius, let's put your claims to the test. Give us your numbers. If these vaccines are so dangerous, how many people do you expect to fall seriously ill or die from these coronavirus vaccines in, say, the next year?

Give us a percentage. What percentage of those who received the vaccine will become seriously ill, and what percentage of people will die, as a direct consequence of Trump's vaccines?
Estimate deaths for a year? You once again show your ignorance. Safety testing of vaccines normally runs over a 4 year period. Unfortunately for you no animal/safety studies of mrna vaccines have ever been completed successfully. It's how we know no safety testing was done by Phizer or Moderna. And this technology is not all that new. It was patented back in 1989 by Dr. Robert Malone while working at the Salk Institute. That means in 30+ years no one has ever successfully gotten FDA approval for an mrna vaccine. They've been attempted, but none ever got past animal testing. That's why animal testing was not done by Phizer or Moderna. Why do what they knew would fail? And the FDA allowed them to bypass testing. Why? Why drop all safety/animal testing when no attempted mrna vaccine ever made it past animal testing? Why turn the entire world into one massive test of an experimental mrna vaccine?

The problem? Oh, the mrna vaccines developed antibodies and the animals survived that. What they didn't survive is being challenged with the virus they were being vaccinated against. After vaccination the animals had to have the vaccine tested against the virus. Just like anyone in real life would be tested against the disease. The virus when introduced to the animals brought on massive cytokine storms and the animal's own immune system killed them. They didn't use the spike protein in previous attempts. What we already know is that the spike proteins used in the current vaccines circulate throughout the body. They settle into the reproductive organs, the heart, the lungs, and one more place I can't remember off the top of my head. That why we have women having miscarriages at highly elevated rates as well as problems with their periods. And how many females will be sterilized? We have no idea but little girls are already exhibiting bleeding issues. It's why we have problems with blood clots, inflammation of the heart, heart attacks, as well as breathing problems, etc.... And I haven't even touched on the damage spike proteins do to the blood-brain barrier.

Also, the only reasons hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were attacked so viciously is because the only path to getting an EUA is to have no available treatment. That's why drugs that have been around for decades were suddenly declared to be dangerous after being known for decades to be among the safest drugs on the market.

Whatever the 4 year death and severe adverse effect total will be it will be very large. It will be the largest catastrophy ever unleashed on the human race.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
That's why animal testing was not done by Phizer or Moderna. Why do what they knew would fail? And the FDA allowed them to bypass testing. Why?
Trump ordered the FDA to bypass testing, oh thick one. You're forgetting that these coronavirus vaccines are Trump's babies. He willingly owns them himself, in his speeches. Why do you hate Trump so much?
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
That's why animal testing was not done by Phizer or Moderna. Why do what they knew would fail? And the FDA allowed them to bypass testing.
It would appear that you are lying:

"COVID-19 vaccines underwent preclinical testing in animals and clinical trials in tens of thousands of people, which established their safety and efficacy. Such testing is also a prerequisite for receiving emergency use authorization by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. While deaths have occurred among vaccinated people, it is important to remember that more than 157 million people in the U.S. have been vaccinated, and that the rate of deaths among vaccinated people isn’t higher than that of unvaccinated people. This indicates that COVID-19 vaccines aren’t the cause of these deaths."

 

Gary K

New member
Banned
Trump ordered the FDA to bypass testing, oh thick one. You're forgetting that these coronavirus vaccines are Trump's babies. He willingly owns them himself, in his speeches. Why do you hate Trump so much?
I have executed several searches on your assertion and can find no evidence this ever happened, That you post no evidence for your assertion tells me you have none.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
I have executed several searches on your assertion and can find no evidence this ever happened, That you post no evidence for your assertion tells me you have none.
You mustn't have looked very hard and are rather clueless. Here are a couple of references:

"US President Trump has told US drug regulators to accelerate emergency authorization of the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine..."


"President Trump lashed out anew at the Food and Drug Administration in a Friday morning tweet, attacking the agency’s commissioner, Dr. Stephen M. Hahn, by name for not approving a Covid-19 vaccine faster."


And here is a recent quote directly from Trump during his recent political rally in Ohio:

"When the virus arrived, we produced three vaccines in record time, they said it would take three years to five years. We got it done in less than nine months. Record, record, record time...Remember when they wouldn’t report that the vaccine was effective before the election? Right after the election, oh, the big vaccine story, it was the greatest thing ever. But before, they wouldn’t report it, they wouldn’t report it..."

 

Gary K

New member
Banned
It would appear that you are lying:

"COVID-19 vaccines underwent preclinical testing in animals and clinical trials in tens of thousands of people, which established their safety and efficacy. Such testing is also a prerequisite for receiving emergency use authorization by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. While deaths have occurred among vaccinated people, it is important to remember that more than 157 million people in the U.S. have been vaccinated, and that the rate of deaths among vaccinated people isn’t higher than that of unvaccinated people. This indicates that COVID-19 vaccines aren’t the cause of these deaths."


LOL. Show the timeline for animal testing. I've debunked claims like this before. There is too much evidence that no animal testing was done. The vaccine development corporations have so much power they easily corrupt the press because the press relies on their advertising dollars.

Remember animal testing, to do it right, takes 4 years. So, in a vaccine released in less than a year just how long was spent in animal testing? Just how fast was the "safety and efficacy" of the mrna vaccines established? How many shortcuts were taken? You have no idea and neither do I. We just know from vaccine development history it normally takes 4 years to do it anywhere close to right.

Remember, developing vaccines is a 10 to 15 year process. How many of the normal processes were shortened and by how much?

Animal testing skipped:

 
Top