marhig
Well-known member
1. David still rests in sheol, that is the grave, also called hell. In the book of Acts he is contrasted against Jesus whose soul was not left in hell. When David had a little infant that died, he did not say that the child went to a special baby heaven, he said that it would not come to him, but that he would rather go to it. If David is dead and buried and not ascended to heaven (John 3:13) then the infant is also dead.
Acts 2:29-31 KJV
(29) Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day.
(30) Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne;
(31) He seeing this before spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption.
2. Job says that the old man and the infant of days alike go to the same death. Passages already cited above, Job 3:11-22. Our Torment Gallery went into a fit and started with the personal mocking attacks rather than address the passage.
The question was not whether men or infants are in hell. That's a given, hell is the resting place of the dead, not a bizarre torture chamber. The question is whether hell will give up its dead when Jesus returns and calls them forth from the grave. If there is no resurrection to life there is no life. If you are arguing against the resurrection of children then you are saying that they shall never live.
If you are arguing that children shall not be judged, are you really so naive as to think that children are something other than small adults with fewer birthdays? The scripture says that the dead shall live and stand before God. Some of the dead are children. If you don't trust the words of those passages then say so. If you don't trust God's the methods of God's judgment than just say so.
I think we can trust God. I really don't think that he planned the crucifixion and resurrection of Christ thousands of years and advance and it never once occurred to him that some of the dead never had a chance to live in the first place. Do you think he's that careless? But neither do I believe that there is another path to Salvation other than Jesus Christ, which would be the case if your assertion of "infant salvation" were correct.
Wow. Is that how all mainstream Christians believe? I don't see it like that at all! You've been saying that others here are wrong to say that some are tormented for an eternity, yet you think that a loving God would leave people in their dead bodies in their graves? No way! This dust goes back to the dust and the spirit goes back to God (Ecclesiastes 12:7)
Jesus said to the thief on the cross, today you will be will me in paradise, there was no lying in any grave there till a certain day to be raised up!
What do you think it means in the Bible when it says we are raised with Christ?
And when Jesus died, it says that the saints arose out of the graves? Do you believe that they actually came out of the ground like zombies in their old flesh? Don't you think if that happened, all the Jews would have believed him? Yet they still persecuted Gods people after the death and resurrection. This is spiritual its not natural graves that are being spoken about.
You see the Bible as totally natural, God is spirit and he speaks in and through the spirit, and he gives us the ears to hear and understand.
I believe that walk straight out of this body and straight out of the grave! And God puts us where he will.