Ouch! Point received and taken.
I apologize for my harshness to others.
If I understood all of God’s secret plans and possessed all knowledge, but didn’t love others, I would be nothing.
you got that right
charity trumps all
Ouch! Point received and taken.
I apologize for my harshness to others.
If I understood all of God’s secret plans and possessed all knowledge, but didn’t love others, I would be nothing.
Why do you focus on the darkness, rather than the Light of the world?
Interesting, Sister, I was going to ask him the same question or something along the lines of why he fears the darkness if he has the Light.
Tim said:Ummm, because some people claim that God sends his enemies to a torture pit and keeps them alive there being tortured (I call it like I see it) forever and ever. Why does a lamp focus light in the dark places? To expose the error that lies hidden in the dark. Yes, let's forget this false doctrine of eternal conscious torment in hell and focus on the Light of the world who came to rescue us from death and give us eternal life. Bless you Ktoyou, God willing we will move on from this present darkness into the light of God's truth. But as long as people are trapped in this dark pit of error, people like you and I need to shine a light in and show them the way out.
And I have backed up what I have said with scripture.I've backed up what I've said by scripture.
Okay, you can ask me! :chuckle:
Just trying to make the world a little better, you know, shine a light (Need2breathe)
Here's what I told her, I guess you missed it:
You dwell a great deal on the subject of abortion, is it not the very devil itself? does the devil deserve his portion? are there not men and woman whose life is dedicated to his evil arts?
Do YOU see the condition of their souls? are you able to judge what punishment to aportion the murderer of somebody's darling child?
The doctrine of anihilism strengthens the hand of murder, rape, abortion etc.
Yeah I did miss that! Thanks for bringing it to my attention. This is like one loooong thread!
So you feel that you are shining a light onto a false understanding of Scripture. Well, that's rational. I see you don't feel you can trust Revelation 14:9 as a proof text in support of ECT. Okay, that's rational as well. I don't mean to sound patronizing. I tend to type as I think. Can you go back to Luke Chapter 16 and the account of Lazarus and the rich man. There doesn't seem to be any time constraint regarding the rich man's torment in hell. It appears he's stuck there for all eternity. Would that account not equate to supportive proof text in terms of Revelation 14:9? Jude 7 also seems to support ECT.
The question I really want to ask is if the differences within our understandings are all that important? I mean, you say you want to shine a light but just as with other understandings/doctrines, like OSAS for example, there is Scriptural support for both points of view. I haven't actually researched your side of it nor have I taken the time to read every post you've made here, but I will.
Babies lack moral/mental capacity to sin/reject God. They will be in heaven despite the temporal judgments of the Flood.
Well, I feel like it's important. If you believed that your best friend was the most wonderful person in the world and somebody claimed that he was cruel to animals, and you knew that he wasn't, wouldn't you stand up for him? And why can't we discuss this topic?
Jude 7 supports ECT? Sodom and Gemorrah were destroyed, and they are the example of the coming judgment. Why do you think this supports ECT?
"Just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire." That's why.
I undergo no small amount of pain when I consider my best friends since I was five years old, both of whom are Jewish, one by faith and one by ethnicity. I love them dearly and I pray for them but I can't force them to believe. I can only love them.
Please don't misunderstand. I don't think it's wrong to discuss the topic. I think it's wrong to allow a topic to undermine what is right and good in the Body.
"Just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire." That's why.
Since Sodom and Gomorrah are not still on fire burning, but were annihilated, it follows that "eternal fire" totally consumes what it destroys.
Okay, let's pledge to remain kind to one another, even if we disagree in this area. I'm still not seeing how Jude 7 supprts ECT. S & G were destroyed by the eternal fire, right? Their punishment was to be destroyed by eternal fire, and they were. They are not still burning. They are still destroyed. That's the example of the coming judgment. Destruction by eternal fire. It seems to me to be an open and shut case in favor of destruction rather than ECT.
Exactly.I didn't say they couldn't be destroyed. Destruction does not necessarily mean annihilation.
Since Sodom and Gomorrah are not still on fire burning, but were annihilated, it follows that "eternal fire" totally consumes what it destroys.
What he said :chuckle:
Exactly.
He knows that. He's just trying really hard to skirt around it and avoid it.
It has already been shown to him that apollumi (verb form) and apolleia (noun form) in scripture, which are translated destroy, perish, lost, lose, die, etc., do not mean "cease to exist".
In fact, in ancient Greek literature even outside of scripture, these Greek words were not used to mean "cease to exist".
Homer, the ancient Greek poet that wrote the Iliad and the Odyseey used the words for the slain and the perished.
But these slain and perished ones still existed (and were still conscious) in Hades.
The word meaning at that time did not carry the modern connotation of annihilation, as in ceased to exist.
They carried the connotation of going from existing in one state of being to existing in another state of being, but not as "ceased to exist".
It would be wise to familiarize yourself with the actual use of the ancient words at the time they were used instead of trying to force a modern meaning to them just to satisfy your own agenda of what you perceive that God's divine justice ought to be.
And example would be:2 Thessalonians 2 KJVOur modern use of the word "letteth/let" has the connotation of "allow/loosen".
(7) For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way.
But in the day it was written, it meant "restrain/retain".
So, to use our modern definition, instead of the definition of that time, would cause one to have a completely unbiblical understanding of the message of scripture.
But you are speaking of the physical. I am speaking of the spirits or souls and I think that is what I think Jude 7 refers to also.