If Jamie is addressing me, I want her to know that she's on my permanent Ignore list.
The word "adopted" is a faulty translation of the Greek huiothesia. Jesus said we must be born of the Spirit, not adopted by him.
Paul's first sending was a dispensation of the gospel (1 Corinthians 9:17 KJV, 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV) to the Jew first and also to the Greek during the time of promise in Acts (Acts 13:16 KJV, Acts 13:26 KJV, Galatians 3:29 KJV). By the close of Acts, the remnant was gathered into the Body and the far hence sending of Paul (a due time all men inclusion (1 Timothy 2:4-6 KJV), to even Gentiles such as we (Acts 22:17-21 KJV, Ephesians 2:11-12 KJV), given the dispensation of the grace of God to usward (Ephesians 3:1-2 KJV) to testify the gospel of the grace of God (Acts 20:24 KJV, 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV) ensued (Ephesians 3:1-9 KJV).Here's a good question for "MADDESTS?" At what point of time did the Grace Gospel become, the ONLY Gospel being preached to both Jew and Gentile alike?
Morning Jamie, scripture says both "adopted" and " born of the Spirit".
You have never been a person that wants to debate you want to dominate with your stupidity and arrogance.
Guess what you are the type of person ignore was made for.
:wave:
It's sort of a "Reaping and Sowing" process. If you treat others with disrespect (name calling, etc) you can only expect the same from them. We usually treat people who are nice to us, nicely. On the other hand, those who treat us in an uncivil manner, we tend to reciprocate in like manner. My personality is such, that I won't draw "First blood" in any given conversation. However, if someone starts something with me, I'll return the favor. I suspect most posters/people are like-minded in that area of life?
Is he saying that the Old Covenant is the ministration of death and of condemnation...
I afford people I don't know the benefit of the fact that I don't know them and I treat them with the respect that I'd have them treat me with. After I get to know them, however, I treat people with the respect they've earned.
Same way I do everyone else. I make an argument. If they respond to the argument, they can be as combative as they want. I've got nice thick skin and don't mind it when people go a little nuts. I go nuts too sometimes (unfortunately).There are times when a "Newbie" will come on TOL and right away, out of the box, goes on the attack. How do you respond to those types?
Same way I do everyone else. I make an argument. If they respond to the argument, they can be as combative as they want. I've got nice thick skin and don't mind it when people go a little nuts. I go nuts too sometimes (unfortunately).
The one's I cannot tolerate are those who knowingly blaspheme God (i.e. some of the Calvinists around here mostly) and those who prove to be just a complete waste of time and energy because they refuse to engage the debate. I do try to at least allow them to waste my time first before relegating them to the pile of debris that dodge currently occupies.
Also, I'm terrible, really just awful actually, with names and if I haven't seen someone post something for quite a while, I'll often forget that I've ever read a single post they've ever written and so people will often get several chances to waste my time before they land on my ignore list.
A tactic of the dialectic is to side step or ignore whatever cannot be effectively opposed in a few sentences.
Whats the dialectic? See the Greek in I Timothy 6:20-21, especially αντιθεσεις της ψευδωνυμου γνωσεως,"anti-thesis of falsely called knowledge," implying the διαλεκτική, or dialectic, in Greek philosophy before Christ. And see Genesis 3:1-6 and John 8 for its use as a method of argument.