Nope, you have been a jerk from your first post and you carry it well.
Liar!
Only in your delusional mind.
Fool.
You handled the truth of what I said just like you handle scripture. You make it say what you want it to say.
Keep telling yourself that.
Your idea of debating is " here let me lead you into the same error and deception I am in, and if you do not follow me like a lemming then you are an intellectual hack". Thanks but no thanks.
You're a complete lying idiot. All of my posts are still here for everyone to read, moron! I've been doing this probably for most of your life. I engaged you directly and make the horrible mistake of making an argument in the form of a counter-question that you instantly refused to answer. You're a waste of everyone's time, including your own and make no mistake about it. My only goal when engaging you will be to demonstrate exactly that, which will be easy to do and immediately effective. Your kind has come and gone around here more times than I can count. You're a childish hack that hasn't any idea what he's talking about and nothing more.
Yes they are and all with an ounce of honesty can see your dishonesty !
Notice which of us was quick to point out that there here for everyone to read, dodge. I'm not afraid at all for people to read my posts. In fact, I'm quite proud of most of them.
Here's a test to see who's honest and who isn't. Beware, this is going to be a question that you have to either answer or ignore!
Will you admit that the stupidity of referring to Paul as the "I Am" has nothing to do with Mid-Acts Dispensationalism - no matter what these other people meant by their statement?
Here, since I know already that you will not answer. - NO! You won't admit that and you won't stop making the spurious association either. You won't because you're a hack, an intellectuall lazy and dishonest hack who doesn't have a clue what in the world Mid-Acts Dispensationalism teaches. All you know is that it teaches that your doctrine is false and it must therefore wrong and that's as far as you're willing to think the matter through because you're scared that there might be someone here who actually does know what he's talking about who might actually succeed in proving your doctrine false.
Resting in Him,
Clete