You still haven't presented any facts
Is Homosexuality a Disorder?
- Thread starter glassjester
- Start date
- Status
You still haven't presented any facts
Blow it out your horn Mr. Donkey
FACTS: Penis + Vagina. Perhaps you are not familiar with either one.
musterion
Well-known member
Vagina → reception of penis/semen, and childbirth
Mouth → ingestion of food and drink; speech
Anus → waste elimination
A sixth grade health class teaches that much.
Those are all the facts you need.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Perhaps you're not familiar with the fact that heterosexual couples engage in non-procreative sexual activity.
To be consistent, you'd have to say that's not allowed for them either.
That isn't a fact it's just bad sentence structure.
What counts as 'evidence' for things like this takes a laughably trivial relevance to what they will dictate as evidence for things that go against them.
In other words, everything of 'innate homosexuality' is based on what either gays merely state or studies which presume utterly after the fact.
It's not real science- it's bias from a bunch of pretentious people and so called 'experts' being pushed to tell them what they want to hear.
Ever since that seal burst open, you see what trails behind the homosexuality- we now are facing demands that women can be born in male bodies.
You know how you go about the people who perpetuate that nonsense? You call them out on their real intention, which is why they even join the boards- to wage a war on Christianity.
In other words, everything of 'innate homosexuality' is based on what either gays merely state or studies which presume utterly after the fact.
It's not real science- it's bias from a bunch of pretentious people and so called 'experts' being pushed to tell them what they want to hear.
Ever since that seal burst open, you see what trails behind the homosexuality- we now are facing demands that women can be born in male bodies.
You know how you go about the people who perpetuate that nonsense? You call them out on their real intention, which is why they even join the boards- to wage a war on Christianity.
I already addressed that Mrs. Thread Nazi.
I can't help but notice that you provided no evidence to support any of this.
musterion
Well-known member
That's Anna.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
:chuckle: Oh, it's going to be fun watching you "perm-ignore" me...
AnnaBenghazi = Thats your name now, since you are helping to elect Mrs. Gay-Marriage Billary Clinton.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Apparently not memorably.
No, probably not. But it can whistle. That's the point. Evolution doesn't work on some preconceived notion of what a feature was designed to do. It works based on what can be done with it. That's the problem with taking a teleological view of biology, as Selaphiel put it.
It's a simple example, and it wouldn't take you more than a moment to answer if you contemplate it honestly. So why don't you give me a straight answer: Do you think that whistling is inherently disordered? And if not, why not?
Selaphiel
Well-known member
Nature is a personal agent with intentions now? Did nature intend for the appropriation of the Type III secretory system in bacteria to be appropriated as a base for the flagellum in some bacteria? What a pervert!
It does however seem that nature selects for features that are beneficial for the perpetuation of a species. Homosexuality is present across the animal kingdom, which suggests that it is selected for at a population level, which means it aids in the perpetuation of the species. In that case, the appropriation of parts of the human anatomy for the expression of homosexual sexuality, then that is also a function for that anatomy.
You fail to comprehend even basic evolutionary theory.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
By not voting for your man-crush?
Just asking, that's all.
By the way, there is no such thing as "gay rights", so once again you are displaying your ignorance. There is a Bill or Rights that all American citizens have. There are no gay rights, latino rights, womens rights, animal rights, or any other separate rights.
Nice try AnnaBenghazi, but too weak.
I am officially bored with you pinheads. I'm off. Have a nice day.
Should Trump lose, there will be an outcry of "it's all their fault for refusing to support our candidate" ... when in actuality, it would be the fault of those who did not choose a superior candidate to run on the Republican ticket. By superior, I mean ANY of the other candidates ...
gcthomas
New member
You seem unaware of what actual science has done to illuminate what you would wish to be thoroughly obscured in the darkness of religious dogma. Try this, for example:
This is an obvious evolutionary advantage for homosexual men as it tends to preserve their genes for future generations. It could explain why homosexuality persists in the population when evolution would otherwise have removed this tendency from the gene pool long ago.
Perhaps, if you disagree, you could offer whatever it is that you imagine to be real science.
Last edited:
- Status