I have another activity in this mission. I support the work of one of the people involved in Biologos.
Biologist supports heretical viewpoints. Many Christians and even atheists understand Biologos has an illogical theology. An atheist on Jerry Coynes website sums up the illogical stance of Biologos.
"Thus BioLogos has no actual principle to stand on when they oppose a literal reading of Genesis but support a literal reading of a story of a virgin birth."
Someone else makes the comment
"… Do you ever get tired of tying yourself into a pretzel trying to ignore obvious logical implications, and to keep others from noting them?"
https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress...h-the-fundies/
Atheists are mocking Biologos for is their inconsistency. Both the creation and the resurrection are told as historical accounts. Both have symbolism and theological implications.
Another comment from an atheist on the same site...
"BioLogos has no actual principle to stand on when they oppose a literal reading of Genesis but support a literal reading of a story of a virgin birth"
Atheists note the inconsistency of Biologos without even understanding how the Biologos position is inconsistent with the Gospel. If first Adam is only allegorical then the Last Dams physical death was unnecessary.
Perhaps the heresy and faith destroying belief system of Biologos is best exposed in the words of their frequent contributor Karl Gilberson. He explained how evolution changed him..."It etched holes in those parts of Christianity connected to these stories—the fall, ‘Christ as second Adam’, the origins of sin, and nearly everything else that I counted sacred."
{From Gilbersons (heretical) book Saving Darwin: How to be a Christian and Believe in Evolution}
