Yes it is. You just don't believe in the Trinity. Completely different topic all together.
Luke 1:43
43 And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me?
Mother of my Lord is not the same as mother of God.
Yes it is. You just don't believe in the Trinity. Completely different topic all together.
Luke 1:43
43 And whence is this to me, that the mother of my Lord should come to me?
Mother of my Lord is not the same as mother of God.
You are claiming that belief in the Trinity distorts the meaning of the verse?Yes it is. You just don't believe in the Trinity. Completely different topic all together.
Sigh.You are claiming that belief in the Trinity distorts the meaning of the verse?
That should be a big red warning flag.
The opinions that you've learned from your chosen man-made non-Catholic sect are noted.You totally misunderstand Paul's testimony about Luke... nothing in those verses say Luke was of the uncircumcised. Unless you read into it something that isn't there. Which I would add, is the bread and butter of Catholic Dogma... almost all of it is developed out of the silence of scriptures.
Of course you'll stick with the wrong answer, it your way.
Agreed, since Jesus Christ is a single Divine Person. :thumb:It's impossible to separate our Lord's human nature from His divine nature.
The opinions that you've learned from your chosen man-made non-Catholic sect are noted.
...including Paul's words in Col. 4:11, which indicate that Luke was indeed one of the uncircumcised. Nice try, though.Language is not an opinion...words have meaning.
You are without a double one of the biggest liars I hav had the displeasure of having to deal with in my live. Even when to objective truth is standing in fronnt of you... you lie...
...including Paul's words in Col. 4:11, which indicate that Luke was indeed one of the uncircumcised. Nice try, though.
Hardly, since your statements in Post #84 above are indeed merely opinions that you have been taught by your chosen recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect. Your glaring Ad Hominem Fallacy, however, is noted. :yawn:
Gaudium de veritate,
Cruciform
+T+
"wrong answer" = "anything which contradicts the non-authoritative opinions of RD's preferred man-made non-Catholic sect":yawn:
It is decidedly not "spam," as has been readily observed here, as well as other places on TOL.cruciform is still spamming his own thread...
If they ban me for making a cogent---and thus far unanswerable---argument, there's really nothing I can do about it....but don't worry it has been reported by right divider
Already decisively answered (Post #110). :yawn:Paul says no such thing in that verse... use your brain and READ!...you know... ENGLISH!... the WORDS. put 2 and 2 together and be honest for once.Also, I do NOT belong to a sect.... so once again you are bearing false witness... telling a falsehood which is a SIN.You remind my of one of my Uncles... my Dad used to say he would lie even if the truth was in his favor.
Questions? Comments?
No, not "idols." Catholics do not worship sacred images and objects, and where there is no worship there can be no "idolatry." Sorry for your confusion.Why do you call this and all your other idols...
An icon is simply a sacred "image." See, for example, this....of Mary icons?
Now go ahead and post your proof for this wholly unsubstantiated assertion.The RCC perverted the Second Commandment in order to introduce the thousands of idols into your false religion.
No, not "idols." Catholics do not worship sacred images and objects, and where there is no worship there can be no "idolatry." Sorry for your confusion.
An icon is simply a sacred "image." See, for example, this.
Now go ahead and post your proof for this wholly unsubstantiated assertion.
Gaudium de veritate,
Cruciform
+T+
Looks like the artist expressed God pointing to Jesus. Don't make up something .
Questions? Comments?
Questions? Comments?
No, not "idols." Catholics do not worship sacred images and objects, and where there is no worship there can be no "idolatry." Sorry for your confusion.
An icon is simply a sacred "image." See, for example, this.
Cruciform
+T+