Hooray For Pedophilia!

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Is anybody surprised that Joe Biden, the child molester, has nominated for the Supreme Court a candidate who approves of pedophilia and child pornography?


 

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
I'm not sure the numbers of those arrested are anywhere close to the numbers of those committing the crime.
This is a valid point you are making -- a rare occurrence. It is only a flawed point of reference. Compare it to the 20,000 arrests for domestic abuse of children that occurs annually.
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond

The War on Innocence​

A Kentucky summer camp teaches “sex liberation,” “BDSM,” and “self-pleasure” to minors.

The principles of queer theory have escaped from the college campus and made their way into a summer camp for children in rural Kentucky. Last year, a nonprofit coalition called Sexy Sex Ed organized a series of “Sexy Summer Camp” events targeted toward minors that included lessons on “sex liberation,” “gender exploration,” “BDSM,” “being a sex worker,” “self-managed abortions,” and “sexual activity while using licit and illicit drugs.”


Sexy Sex Ed is ... recruiting children as young as 13 to discuss graphic sexual practices with the instructors and adult co-participants in their thirties and forties. The camp organizers have admitted that they target vulnerable youth, including foster children, who are at high risk of sexual abuse.




 

Idolater

"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
I scanned the article but didn't see a reason for McConnell to be pushing this. Strategically he's got to be thinking about the midterms. What would be the strategic value in not opposing Biden's pic for SCOTUS?
Not opposing a Black woman nominee? Let me think! lol
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Not opposing a Black woman nominee? Let me think! lol
That's easily avoided. Just promote a conservative black female judge. Hammer Jackson on her record where she's soft, while proposing a black female conservative judge as a viable alternative.
 

Idolater

"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
That's easily avoided. Just promote a conservative black female judge.
Yeah.
Hammer Jackson on her record where she's soft, while proposing a black female conservative judge as a viable alternative.
They're just swapping one Dem justice for another one though. At the end of the day the Supreme Court 'scorecard' is still going to say 6-to-3 Republican advantage. I'm not sure Repubs will gain any independents for this year's midterms based on proposing a different Black woman judge with Republican values for a replacement nominee. Maybe.
 

Idolater

"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
@JudgeRightly makes the bold claim that if Jesus really did rise from the dead, that Christianity is true.

Rising from the dead only proves someone can rise from the dead. Why are the particulars of anything else validated by that? Everything else needs independent verification.
I missed this before. This has got to be one of the dumbest things I've ever seen come out of anybody's brain.

My brain doesn't work that way.

I repeat. The dumbest.
 

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
@JudgeRightly makes the bold claim that if Jesus really did rise from the dead, that Christianity is true.


I missed this before. This has got to be one of the dumbest things I've ever seen come out of anybody's brain.

My brain doesn't work that way.

I repeat. The dumbest.
You do not get basic logic.

In my observation your brain has not been capable of logic so far. You very verbosely say very little, and what you do say is often not rationally central the conversation you are engaged in.

A miraculous display has an emotional impact on many humans. However, cognitively complex persons do not become needlessly trapped by all-or-none thinking.
 
Last edited:

Idolater

"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
You do not get basic logic.
It doesn't censored matter how much logic you know when you don't know a lick of rhetoric! Crack a book! I haven't read the rest of your post yet I'll wait for your reply, or I'll just read it later.
In my observation your brain has not been capable of logic so far. You very verbosely say very little, and what you do say is often not rationally central the conversation you are engaged in.

I miraculous display has an emotional impact on many humans. However, cognitively complex persons do not become needlessly trapped by all-or-none thinking.
Peace to you.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
@JudgeRightly makes the bold claim that if Jesus really did rise from the dead, that Christianity is true.

I'm not the one that made the claim.

I missed this before. This has got to be one of the dumbest things I've ever seen come out of anybody's brain.

1 Corinthians 15:12-19
12 Now if Christ is preached that He has been raised from the dead, how do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? 13 But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then Christ is not risen. 14 And if Christ is not risen, then our preaching is empty and your faith is also empty. 15 Yes, and we are found false witnesses of God, because we have testified of God that He raised up Christ, whom He did not raise up—if in fact the dead do not rise. 16 For if the dead do not rise, then Christ is not risen. 17 And if Christ is not risen, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins! 18 Then also those who have [c]fallen asleep in Christ have perished. 19 If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men the most pitiable.

Paul is the one who made the claim. If you have an issue with that reasoning, then you have some serious problems with your theology.

My brain doesn't work that way.

I repeat. The dumbest.

Calling Paul dumb isn't a good idea.
 

Idolater

"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
I'm not the one that made the claim.



1 Corinthians 15:12-19
12 Now if Christ is preached that He has been raised from the dead, how do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? 13 But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then Christ is not risen. 14 And if Christ is not risen, then our preaching is empty and your faith is also empty. 15 Yes, and we are found false witnesses of God, because we have testified of God that He raised up Christ, whom He did not raise up—if in fact the dead do not rise. 16 For if the dead do not rise, then Christ is not risen. 17 And if Christ is not risen, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins! 18 Then also those who have [c]fallen asleep in Christ have perished. 19 If in this life only we have hope in Christ, we are of all men the most pitiable.

Paul is the one who made the claim. If you have an issue with that reasoning, then you have some serious problems with your theology.



Calling Paul dumb isn't a good idea.
You need to reread that post. It was not directed to you.
 
Top