Hooray For Pedophilia!

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
I said "as if." Which shows you're not paying attention.
The phrase does not forgive you from making a bad interpretation. My words cannot be seen to even indirectly lead to the implication you made.
I provided a link that shows that homosexuality was considered by the medical community to be a mental illness at some point.
Your link is worthless beyond its historical value.
Meaning there are medical reasons for it to be a mental illness.
Medical science like all science is forever improving. The medical understanding of homosexuality changed and the change stuck. You can reminisce all you want. It does not make your point a valid one.
Medical reasons are not "matters of taste" nor "dictates of [a] particular religion."
Medical reasons biased by matters of personal taste and religion have been gradually extracted from the field based on objective data.
It's the homosexual community (and their supporters) who have provided no basis for it NOT to be considered a mental illness, aside from that they're offended by it being one (which is no basis at all for removing it from the list of mental illnesses).
Mental health researchers and practitioners draw the conclusions - not community members. Why are there so many posters on this site who require others to prove negatives. ANSWER: the positive evidence is very clear. There is no where else for them to criticize.
Outdated only in the sense that it has become common to accept homosexuals as normal
Based on the decisions of medical professionals.
So, homosexual mass murderers aren't mentally ill?

How about the homosexual child molesters?

How about the homosexuals who seek out other homos to share sexually transmitted diseases?

How about the homosexuals appointed to government positions who actively promote pedophilia?

How about the depression that's prevalent in children who have same-sex parents?
You have to compare pathology between groups to have a meaningful conclusion. And, people with personality disorders who have confusion about their sexuality could be considered primarily heterosexual so do not heap them in the gay category.

Anyone can hide their symptoms, especially if people aren't looking.
Severely mentally ill persons cannot hide the impact.

It doesn't change the fact that they are mentally ill.
Why do you and a few fringe professionals have a special track on this that other well-informed researchers have missed?

Christianity is true because Christ did, in fact, rise from the dead. If He did not rise from the dead, then you might have an argument against Christianity, but since He did, you don no

Christ did rise from the dead. Therefore Christianity is true.

OR

Christ did not rise from the dead. Therefore Christianity is false.

Rising from the dead only proves someone can rise from the dead. Why are the particulars of anything else validated by that? Everything else needs independent verification.
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond

way 2 go

Well-known member
View attachment 2935

well that explains it
 

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
Everyone agrees sex trafficing and child pornography must be irradicated. (Some forgive republican congressman if they are MAGA enough). But, not everyone misconstrues age appropriate educational discussions as grooming, or the actions of a few low-level employees as the central goal of the organization employing them.
 

marke

Well-known member
Everyone agrees sex trafficing and child pornography must be irradicated. (Some forgive republican congressman if they are MAGA enough). But, not everyone misconstrues age appropriate educational discussions as grooming, or the actions of a few low-level employees as the central goal of the organization employing them.
Any government official or private American who refuses to condemn child pornography is standing in lockstep with the devil in the camp of God's enemies.
 

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
Any government official or private American who refuses to condemn child pornography is standing in lockstep with the devil in the camp of God's enemies.
Name someone who refuses to condemn child pornography in this century.
 

marke

Well-known member
Nope. Not having it. People who in a brief instance mistakenly defend someone who was involved statutory rape cannot be said to support pedophilia. That's reaching. And, I said this century. Some of those quotes occurred in the last century.
Trump had nothing to do with what happened in Charlottesville either but there are those who subtly support child sexual indoctrination molestation who condemned Trump in spite of his innocence.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Nope. Not having it.

Too bad. You were shown what you asked for, and now you're denying the evidence.

People who in a brief instance mistakenly defend someone who was involved statutory rape cannot be said to support pedophilia.

Amazon (still, as of today) selling a book promoting pedophilia is not "a brief instance mistakenly defending pedophilia.

That's reaching. And, I said this century. Some of those quotes occurred in the last century.

Most of those are from this century. Seems like you didn't bother reading most of them.
 

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
Too bad. You were shown what you asked for, and now you're denying the evidence.

Weak and nonexisting evidence.
Amazon (still, as of today) selling a book promoting pedophilia is not "a brief instance mistakenly defending pedophilia.
Men Kampf and the Communist Manifesto, and the Bible are also available. Should they not be?

Seems like you didn't bother reading most of them.
True. I saw enough of the grasping at straws to let me know the "journalistic" quality.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Weak and nonexisting evidence.

Like I said, you're in denial.

Men Kampf and the Communist Manifesto,

Not sure.

and the Bible are also available. Should they not be?

The Bible outright condemn ANY sexual activity outside of marriage.

That includes pedophilia.

True. I saw enough of the grasping at straws to let me know the "journalistic" quality.

The source of some information has very little to nothing to do the content. Dismissing the content because of the source is called a genetic fallacy.
 

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
Like I said, you're in denial.

Really? Pedophilia is so broadly defined and support is so broadly defined, they can include almost anyone. But, they left out Cardinal Law. . .
Not sure.
The Bible outright condemn ANY sexual activity outside of marriage.
I want to have access to controversial books so I can reject their premises directly, so I am glad amazon has a wide latitude in selecting the books available.
The source of some information has very little to nothing to do the content. Dismissing the content because of the source is called a genetic fallacy.
That's nice. I did not reject the source out of hand. I saw their treatment of the issue and found it wildly over-broad.
 

Idolater

"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
Nope. Not having it. People who in a brief instance mistakenly defend someone who was involved statutory rape cannot be said to support pedophilia. That's reaching. And, I said this century. Some of those quotes occurred in the last century.
It doesn't matter. What's the point in even asking? What support does it lend to your position? How come you don't know this?
 

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
The point is that people believe in a massive underground cabal with great power when the reality is that there a a few weirdos in they mama basement who need to be rooted out.
 

marke

Well-known member
The point is that people believe in a massive underground cabal with great power when the reality is that there a a few weirdos in they mama basement who need to be rooted out.
Educated and informed Americans with good sense do not make light of the huge child trafficking problem here and around the world.

VICTIMS

There’s over 40 million victims
of the human tracking globally today:
25%
are children

CASES

In 2018, over half
51.6%
of the criminal human tracking
cases active in the US were
sex tracking cases
involving only children
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Educated and informed Americans with good sense do not make light of the huge child trafficking problem here and around the world.

VICTIMS

There’s over 40 million victims
of the human tracking globally today:

25%
are children


CASES

In 2018, over half
51.6%
of the criminal human tracking
cases active in the US were
sex tracking cases
involving only children
I've seen estimates of rape ranging from 30% to 70% concerning illegal immigration across the border, for children of both genders and young women

Regardless of what the true number is it's staggering when considering that in the past year you apply that percentage to 2 million. And that's not counting the gotaways
 
Last edited:

Skeeter

Well-known member
Banned
Educated and informed Americans with good sense do not make light of the huge child trafficking problem here and around the world.

CASES
In 2018, over half

51.6%
of the criminal human tracking
cases active in the US were
sex tracking cases
involving only children
One child abused is one child too many. The number of arrests reported for human trafficking involving involuntary servitude increased from 66 in 2015 to 146 in 2019 before declining to 92 in 2020.
 

marke

Well-known member
One child abused is one child too many. The number of arrests reported for human trafficking involving involuntary servitude increased from 66 in 2015 to 146 in 2019 before declining to 92 in 2020.
I'm not sure the numbers of those arrested are anywhere close to the numbers of those committing the crime.
 
Top