How many times does the Holy Spirit come?
Ephesians 1:13
And you also were included in Christ when you heard the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation. When you believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit,
Even thought the carnal mind is enmity against God, nevertheless Paul quotes Deut 30:11ff in Romans 10.
The act of faith is not an act of man but an act under the influence of the Holy Spirit. See Acts 7:51
You seem to believe that the Spirit does not come upon all men.
The bad news that is supposed to be good news.
v.45
It is written in the Prophets: ‘They will all be taught by God.’ Everyone who has heard the Father and learned from him comes to me.
Christ offered it to those he described as not his sheep.
The reality is is that your doctrines require you to focus on the depravity of man (and I accept we are depraved) - in order to uphold the right of God to pick and exclude. This supposed election and reprobation is in diametric opposition to what scripture actually teaches. Romans 10:1-13.
Yes Paul's hearts desire is for them to be saved, but he never ever takes the saving away from God.
While the Holy Spirit is very important he never takes glory for himself.
[MENTION=16283]Sonnet[/MENTION]
Since you are familiar with the Synod of Dordt and it's conclusions, anything I might add would be less than adequate.
Sincerely,
EW
If and only if salvation is accessible to all could Paul preached in such a way.
Not a deep thinker are yuh?
Believe God then and quit worryin' about it.
John 1:3
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ot-universal&p=4721952&viewfull=1#post4721952
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ot-universal&p=4721970&viewfull=1#post4721970
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ot-universal&p=4721972&viewfull=1#post4721972
http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...ot-universal&p=4722686&viewfull=1#post4722686
Yeah, you just want to obfuscate and demand answers to fallacious questions.
There's no need for me to continuously respond when it's quite easy to cut to the chase. You just want to engage in endless ping ponging, and you're not even linguistically qualified to address the inspired text (nor illumined by a renewed mind).
What is it within man that is uncreated for alleged Synergism (that was not within the original Monergistic creation by God)?
One question, and that which comes from it.
What is it within man that can accomplish Syngeristic cooperation with God that God didn't create?
What is this uncreated capability that man has apart from his Creator for Synergism?
Yeah, you just want to obfuscate and demand answers to fallacious questions.
There's no need for me to continuously respond when it's quite easy to cut to the chase. You just want to engage in endless ping ponging, and you're not even linguistically qualified to address the inspired text (nor illumined by a renewed mind).
What is it within man that is uncreated for alleged Synergism (that was not within the original Monergistic creation by God)?
One question, and that which comes from it.
What is it within man that can accomplish Syngeristic cooperation with God that God didn't create?
What is this uncreated capability for Synergism that man has apart from his Creator?
What is this ability for Synergism?
1 John 2:2, John 1:29, 1 Tim 2:4-6, 1 Tim 4:10, John 3:14-16, Hebrews 2:9, Titus 2:11.
Already responded that God / Jesus created all.
1 John 2:2, John 1:29, 1 Tim 2:4-6, 1 Tim 4:10, John 3:14-16, Hebrews 2:9, Titus 2:11.
Respond to those cited posts first please.
Then both the original and new creation are Monergistic. Nothing in man is an ability for Synergism that God didn't create. So man's Synergism is Monergistic.
Simplez. Done.
Why? To expend more time so you ignore truth that is presented? You ignore grammar and every other valid exegetical point in favor of your presuppositions that you somehow presume preclude God's Monergistic original and new creation.
Man can have no ability for Synergism to be a new creation that isn't from the original creation. There's no such thing as Synergism in that context. It's all Monergism.
Romans 10:17 stands, with its nouns that aren't verbs.