Dialogos
Well-known member
This is just sloganeering.You can't reason with hate, especially when it's hiding behind religion.
What a sad, sad, image of Christianity this thread projects.
This is just sloganeering.You can't reason with hate, especially when it's hiding behind religion.
What a sad, sad, image of Christianity this thread projects.
So you love evil and hate good.You can't reason with hate, especially when it's hiding behind religion.
What a sad, sad, image of Christianity this thread projects.
Gay people have the right to live in a secular society free from your religions persecution. When a Christian opens business in the secular world then a persons religion or sexual orientation should not be a consideration.
The only time that wouldn't be the case is when they are being used to harm another person. Rejecting a total stranger (as in customer) does not constitute harm, btw.
it would be a great harm to ME if I had to photograph a gay wedding. That is an infringement on MY freedom.. freedom of association, and of religion.
they do neither. NO one is being the denied to worship as they see fit and no one is silenced. At the same time no one gets to discriminate against a minoritySo, according to you Christians forfeit freedom of speech and religion when dealing with the public.
For a Christian you sure have a lot of Antichristian comments.
But refuse to answer them apparently.
Do you or do you not support the right for 3 men to marry?
Do you or do you not support the right of an adult man to marry his adult sister?
Do you or do you not support the rights of man to marry multiple women?
An interesting side note is what happened to the Oklahoma "religious freedom" law. State representative Emily Virgin added an amendment to that states proposed law stating: "Businesses or companies not wanting to participate" in a business exchange based on the sexual orientation, gender identity or race of either party shall post notice of such refusal in a manner clearly visible to the public in all places of business, including websites."
The bill died a fast death immediately after.
Got it. I do, for reasons of faith and morality.I don't know of any logical / legal reason to oppose these, that is why I asked you why you do. I've asked you that before and then like now you avoid answering.
Nothing wrong with that.
Got it. I do, for reasons of faith and morality.
BTW, so does my pastor. So lets say that an adult biological brother and sister approach an orthodox Rabbi and ask him to perform their marriage ceremony.
He politely declines on the grounds that such a union is an affront to his faith.
Is that Rabbi a bigot?
If justice is served, should he face civil punishment for acting on his convictions?
:doh: You really need to catch up. Yes some certainly are obliged, or at least those are the lawsuits that are passed and being contested. If a couple comes to my church and asks me to marry them, as soon as I allow access to one, the lawsuits are pushing that I then must allow all.What nonsense. No one is obliged to perform a wedding ceremony.
I've never been banned from an atheist site.
Have you been banned from an atheist website?Sounds like you're doing something wrong.