beloved57
Well-known member
The ONLY doctrine that Calvinism got right was the part about OSAS!! Even then, it's reasoning is faulty and without merit!!
Tulip is the Gospel which you reject, calling it calvinism is not going to give you a pass !
The ONLY doctrine that Calvinism got right was the part about OSAS!! Even then, it's reasoning is faulty and without merit!!
The ONLY doctrine that Calvinism got right was the part about OSAS!! Even then, it's reasoning is faulty and without merit!!
Tulip is the Gospel which you reject, calling it calvinism is not going to give you a pass !
Tulip is the Gospel which you reject, calling it calvinism is not going to give you a pass !
We became like God knowing good and evil, see Genesis 3:22. That alone should tell you that we have a choice. The whole Bible is teaching us to choose good. What is the reason to be born into a world with good and evil if not to choose to love God?
False religions and false doctrines of the Reformed group have distorted God’s truth.
Genesis 3 is not explicit in explaining the results of the incident in question. The serpent ("nachash" in Hebrew,the root word means "enchanter, fortune teller") is the one who said that eating of the tree would allow them to know good and evil. The first thing the text states as a result of their eating was that they knew they were naked. No matter how you look at Genesis 3:22, the first result was the knowledge of their nakedness.
Verse 22 is interesting if you look at it closely. The Lord says "Behold them man has become like one of us...". (echad is the Hebrew word translated as "one" here) Why doesn't it just say "Behold the man has become like us..."? Could it be that the Lord is talking to a group of "elohim" here? I have heard people say that the "us" in this verse is referring to the 3 members of the trinity, but I don't think that is the case, one reason being the fact that if God was trying to say that the man had become like Himself ('us' as a trinity) there is a much simpler way to do it. The Hebrew letter kaf denoting the idea of "like" or "similar to" followed by the letters mem-nun-vav (men-oo , meaning "us") would read in English - "like us". That is not the way it is written in Genesis 3:22 though. There is an extra mem before the "men-oo". Mi-men-oo. The extra mem denotes the idea of separation from an origin within a group. In English it would read "from". In fact the Hebrew phrase mi-men-oo is found in Genesis 2:17, 3:3, 3:5, 3:11, etc. If this part of Genesis 3:22 were translated literally, with no preconceived doctrinal bias to shade the translation, it might read "Behold the man has become like one from among us...". The fact that the Hebrew word 'echad', meaning "one" is found in front of this phrase makes it even clearer that there is a particular "one" that is being referred to. Many scholars believe that the "us" referred to in this verse is the "divine council" that is hinted at many places in the bible. (Michael Heiser has a website that deals in depth with the biblical references to this topic.)
The fact that the text says the first thing Adam and Eve knew after eating the fruit was an awareness of their nakedness; and the way that Genesis 3:22 is constructed in Hebrew, leads me to believe that Adam and Eve "knew" good and evil after eating of the forbidden fruit, but this knowledge of good and evil was not like God's knowledge of the same. They had now become like satan, the power working through the nachash, knowing good and evil the same way he did.
The word "knowing" as in "knowing good and evil" is also more than intellectually knowing about something, or understanding something. It also means to experience what is known. Another thing about the forbidden tree - it is not the tree of the knowledge of good or evil, it is the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. This tree has them joined together.
The Tulip is a deadly flower, and if ingested will obscure the truth for those who devour it!!
Sure and Calvin wrote the gospel.
TULIP is a flower. Nothing more.
I'm really not to concerned about what Calvin had to say about the gospel. But one thing i do no from my own experience in life. Is that "freewill" is a totally bogus doctrine and has no business being added to the ONE and ONLY SUPERNATURAL RELIGION OF GOD. Yeah...better yet,take a wide look around you,including yourself in the flesh,and look how "free" everyone is. We're even slaves to a perpetual debate over the GOD who isn't the Author of confusion,and is The Prince of "Peace".
Rom 7:18 For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.
Rom 7:24 O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?
Gen 6:5 And GOD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.
Gen 8:21 And the LORD smelled a sweet savour; and the LORD said in his heart, I will not again curse the ground any more for man's sake; for the imagination of man's heart is evil from his youth; neither will I again smite any more every thing living, as I have done.
Jer 17:9 The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?
You are talking about the Gospel of God's Grace you know !
And, you of course don't know what you're talking about!!!!
And you're a fanatic for untruth!!
See ya at the Judgment !
Good post
Genesis 3 is not explicit in explaining the results of the incident in question. The serpent ("nachash" in Hebrew,the root word means "enchanter, fortune teller") is the one who said that eating of the tree would allow them to know good and evil. The first thing the text states as a result of their eating was that they knew they were naked. No matter how you look at Genesis 3:22, the first result was the knowledge of their nakedness.
Verse 22 is interesting if you look at it closely. The Lord says "Behold them man has become like one of us...". (echad is the Hebrew word translated as "one" here) Why doesn't it just say "Behold the man has become like us..."? Could it be that the Lord is talking to a group of "elohim" here? I have heard people say that the "us" in this verse is referring to the 3 members of the trinity, but I don't think that is the case, one reason being the fact that if God was trying to say that the man had become like Himself ('us' as a trinity) there is a much simpler way to do it. The Hebrew letter kaf denoting the idea of "like" or "similar to" followed by the letters mem-nun-vav (men-oo , meaning "us") would read in English - "like us". That is not the way it is written in Genesis 3:22 though. There is an extra mem before the "men-oo". Mi-men-oo. The extra mem denotes the idea of separation from an origin within a group. In English it would read "from". In fact the Hebrew phrase mi-men-oo is found in Genesis 2:17, 3:3, 3:5, 3:11, etc. If this part of Genesis 3:22 were translated literally, with no preconceived doctrinal bias to shade the translation, it might read "Behold the man has become like one from among us...". The fact that the Hebrew word 'echad', meaning "one" is found in front of this phrase makes it even clearer that there is a particular "one" that is being referred to. Many scholars believe that the "us" referred to in this verse is the "divine council" that is hinted at many places in the bible. (Michael Heiser has a website that deals in depth with the biblical references to this topic.)
The fact that the text says the first thing Adam and Eve knew after eating the fruit was an awareness of their nakedness; and the way that Genesis 3:22 is constructed in Hebrew, leads me to believe that Adam and Eve "knew" good and evil after eating of the forbidden fruit, but this knowledge of good and evil was not like God's knowledge of the same. They had now become like satan, the power working through the nachash, knowing good and evil the same way he did.
The word "knowing" as in "knowing good and evil" is also more than intellectually knowing about something, or understanding something. It also means to experience what is known. Another thing about the forbidden tree - it is not the tree of the knowledge of good or evil, it is the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. This tree has them joined together.
The only problem with that,is that Lucifer/Satan is a fallen,once anointed cherub{very high angelic being}.
Eze 28:13 Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created.
Gen 3:24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword {The Eternal Word of GOD}which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.{the Cross of CHRIST}
Eze 28:14 Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire.
Eze 28:15 Thou wast perfect in thy ways from the day that thou wast created, till iniquity was found in thee.
What are you suggesting...that the elohims are something different than angelic beings. Are "gods" different that holy angels,and fallen angels?? I'm not saying that what your saying doesn't have any plausibility.
You are talking about the Gospel of God's Grace you know !