....what we now have is a new nature
consider Job.
God has satan leashed from going too far.
But
1 cor 5:5 Then you must throw this man out and hand him over to Satan so that his sinful nature will be destroyed and he himself will be saved on the day the Lord returns.
Job 1:11 But put forth Your hand now and touch all that he has; he will surely curse You to Your face." 12Then the LORD said to Satan, "Behold, all that he has is in your power, only do not put forth your hand on him.
God releases the leash for His greater will of testing, proving a point to the demonic and turning someone over to satan so that that person will have his sinful nature destroyed and he himself be saved on the day of judgement.
1 samuel 16:23 So it came about whenever the evil spirit from God came to Saul, David would take the harp and play it with his hand; and Saul would be refreshed and be well, and the evil spirit would depart from him.
evil spirit from God.
....what we now have is a new nature
do you sin?
Sin doesn't figure
do you sin?
Did Paul forgive himself?
Romans 7 is Saul not Paul
You can't seriously believe that the great apostle served sin with his flesh....
so
no one can claim they don't sin
if
it can be shown paul couldn't stop sinning
you don't have to be born again to understand that
no wonder they have so much trouble interpreting this
2 Corinthians 12:7 (KJV)
7 And lest I should be exalted above measure through the abundance of the revelations, there was given to me a thorn in the flesh, the messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I should be exalted above measure.
I missed the part which says the thorn was sin
who said that?
you missed everything Jesus said
based on
what you think paul said
Romans 7 is Saul not Paul
You can't seriously believe that the great apostle served sin with his flesh....
There is not a scrap of difference in Christ's doctrine and Paul.
"If the Son shall set you free you shall be free indeed"
Let each one know tonight if they are free indeed.
I think peter forgave paul
but
warned us about him
People within Mid-Acts differ in their understanding of this aspect - of whether it is Saul or Paul there, as they do as to other aspects of this Epistle of his to the Romans.
And I am fine with that - "not for that we would have dominion over your faith, but are helpers of your joy; for by faith ye stand," 2 Cor. 1:24.
In that spirit, I'll share my own perspective on these things...
Lost people do not delight "in the law of God," let alone, "after the inward man" [principle] said "law of God" is a reference to.
Rather, Paul is relating that to those Jews at Rome, in the Body, still holding to the Law...
And being that Paul is relating general principles as to all this, he was, and has continued - through these general rules of thumb - to address all that have ended up reading said Epistle, down through the ages, whether lost or saved, or saved but confused.
In this, the general rule of thumb that "the names have changed, but the game has remained the same" remains one more general "same, and yet different," rule of thumb, or principle, that has continued to apply.
Personally, I enjoy exploring these differences in our Mid-Acts understanding.
But lest some take advantage of that, I'll add that that differs from the need some have to hound others within Mid-Acts year after year, insisting they alone are right. Those, I will ignore, but for a comment against their lust to glory in the flesh of others.
I hold Paul to be our apostle.