glassjester
Well-known member
wait
you think that because they're homosexual they get abused more? :freak:
Actually, that's a possibility. Is it not?
wait
you think that because they're homosexual they get abused more? :freak:
then you think a 97% correlation is purely random? :freak::freak:
My claim was (and is) that you are the author of your own musical tastes - that your own choices shape your taste in music.
Do you really want to bring this up again?
I agree with her for the most part, you somewhat. A friend talked me into listening to DCTalk. I didn't like them. Years later, I love a lot of what they did. I even grew to love some other rap, and some of it is very moving to me. I could go on, but I do believe a lot of tastes are acquired rather than innate. That said, I don't think any of us really like eating hemlock. If it is ever an exception, I'd bet 10 to 1 it didn't or doesn't last long...Then you're just as bonkers as you were the last time the subject came up then. I have never "chosen" to be drawn to a piece of music or be 'blown away' by certain pieces in that regard. I did not "author" some sort of musical taste where I had some sort of remit as to what would or wouldn't have a 'pleasing effect' to the ear...
If you can't get the fact that some things are beyond choice or will then either time or ignorance will or won't help you on that score.
I agree with her for the most part, you somewhat. A friend talked me into listening to DCTalk. I didn't like them. Years later, I love a lot of what they did. I even grew to love some other rap, and some of it is very moving to me. I could go on, but I do believe a lot of tastes are acquired rather than innate. That said, I don't think any of us really like eating hemlock. If it is ever an exception, I'd bet 10 to 1 it didn't or doesn't last long...
Lon, its bed time buddy
Gays are non-humancause vs correlation.....learn it.
Homosexuals may have been abused doesn't mean abuse is the sufficient cause.
Gays are non-human
Gays are non-human
I'm kidding, I was going for shock value, sorry annaHow can you say something like that?
I'm kidding, I was going for shock value, sorry anna
Gays are non-human
At least I show myself you freakShock value?
Just go back to posting a picture of you as your avatar
At least I show myself you freak
At least I show myself you freak
Then you're just as bonkers as you were the last time the subject came up then. I have never "chosen" to be drawn to a piece of music or be 'blown away' by certain pieces in that regard. I did not "author" some sort of musical taste where I had some sort of remit as to what would or wouldn't have a 'pleasing effect' to the ear...
If you can't get the fact that some things are beyond choice or will then either time or ignorance will or won't help you on that score.
I agree with her for the most part, you somewhat.
If you can't get the fact ...
cause vs correlation.....learn it.
Homosexuals may have been abused doesn't mean abuse is the sufficient cause.
Actually, that's a possibility. Is it not?
In 2001, the journal Archives of Sexual Behavior published a study entitled Comparative data of childhood and adolescence molestation in heterosexual and homosexual persons. The abstract for this article states the following: “ In research with 942 nonclinical adult participants, gay men and lesbian women reported a significantly higher rate of childhood molestation than did heterosexual men and women. Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. Twenty-two percent of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women reported homosexual molestation. http://www.conservapedia.com/Sexual_abuse_being_a_contributing_factor_for_homosexuality |