Feminist furious at funny kid video

[ok doser]

I agree with her for the most part, you somewhat. A friend talked me into listening to DCTalk. I didn't like them. Years later, I love a lot of what they did. I even grew to love some other rap, and some of it is very moving to me. I could go on, but I do believe a lot of tastes are acquired rather than innate. That said, I don't think any of us really like eating hemlock. If it is ever an exception, I'd bet 10 to 1 it didn't or doesn't last long...

hated rap, still hate rap


but....


love weird al's parodies of Drivin' Dirty and Gangsta's Paradise and through the parodies, have grown to appreciate the originals

 

[ok doser]

Gays are non-human

so are Jews! :banana:

 

[quip]

here's one study's findings:

In 2001, the journal Archives of Sexual Behavior published a study entitled Comparative data of childhood and adolescence molestation in heterosexual and homosexual persons. The abstract for this article states the following: “ In research with 942 nonclinical adult participants, gay men and lesbian women reported a significantly higher rate of childhood molestation than did heterosexual men and women. Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. Twenty-two percent of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women reported homosexual molestation. http://www.conservapedia.com/Sexual_abuse_being_a_contributing_factor_for_homosexuality

I wonder how many are unreported?

 

[quip]

so are Jews! :banana:

Careful....someone's bound to call you anti-semitic.

 

[glassjester]

if, however, stats show that only 3% of heteros report being abused as children, I would think that there exists a causal link between abuse and self-identifiaction as homo

Or... it could be that kids that act gay attract the "attention" of gay child molesters.

 

[ok doser]

I wonder how many are unreported?

would you expect a bias in under reporting between homos and heteros?

 

[quip]

Or... it could be that kids that act gay attract the "attention" of gay child molesters.

You mean.... born gay?

 

[quip]

would you expect a bias in under reporting between homos and heteros?

It's a good possibility.

 

[ok doser]

It's a good possibility.

what might be some reasons to account for that?

 

[ok doser]

Or... it could be that kids that act gay attract the "attention" of gay child molesters.

could be


it's difficult to search for valid info on this, a google search responds with so much biased crap


and i'm working on a quiz and an exam and two assignments and six discussion board posts

at least, i should be :noid:

 

[quip]

what might be some reasons to account for that?

Little family secrets...elephants in the room. etc.

 

[ok doser]

why would that apply to one orientation and not the other?

 

[quip]

why would that apply to one orientation and not the other?

The obsession with probing homosexuals (no pun intended) as to the source of their homosexual-ness.

 

[quip]

The obsession with probing homosexuals (no pun intended) as to the source of their homosexual-ness.

Okay, okay...pun slightly intended.

 

[glassjester]

You mean.... born gay?

Babies don't act gay.

 

[quip]

Babies don't act gay.

They don't act hetero either. :idunno:

 

[quip]

The obsession with probing homosexuals (no pun intended) as to the source of their homosexual-ness.

what seems odd is that we don't probe heterosexuals as to the source of their hetero-ness....why the double standard? Perhaps because it's all a wild goose chase. (no pun intended....really this time.)

 

[glassjester]

what seems odd is that we don't probe heterosexuals as to the source of their hetero-ness....why the double standard?

Is that really odd?

 

[quip]

Is that really odd?

Not really. "odd" was rhetorical


No (rational) reason to probe...either way. (RE: the part of my quote you deleted.)

 

[ok doser]

should we "probe" the things that cause pedophiles to act?