Only an evolutionist could possibly believe that broccoli and salmon are the same kind of thing.So "plants" are one kind and "fish" are another?
All you have to do is link to your original answer, or restate it. I've done both many, many times here Stripe. What's stopping you?
:chuckle:Why? Because you asked a question that was answered and you're pretending it wasn't?
Very early on in that thread, I expressed my disagreement with Six, and soon afterward, he clarified his ideas.
Since then, you've been wailing.
Good, at least you got started. 1, the first line is a section title like 2:4, 5:1 and many other places in Moses. It is not action in the account.
2, The verb tense for the earth is that tohu wa-bohu was a pre-existing condition.
I mention these things because so much debate on this is either-or, instead of before-after, or first-then later. The text has two completely different indicators before and after the 6 "days."
You must think all the various Bible translation team have it wrong?
Unless I'm mistaken you think it should read that there was chaos.
However.....
NIV
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters
New Living Translation
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth
The earth was formless and empty, and darkness covered the deep waters. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the surface of the waters.
King James 2000 Bible
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth/
And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters
Trying to prove to you that Six and I are on the same page is boring enough; trying to convince you that we've already settled this is like watching grass grow — in a sandpit.All you have to do is link to your original answer, or restate it. I've done both many, many times here Stripe. What's stopping you?
Before you work further on the species issue, be sure you know the 'tohu wa-bohu' issue.
Trying to prove to you that Six and I are on the same page is boring enough
trying to convince you that we've already settled this is like watching grass grow — in a sandpit.
If you cared, you'd read the thread.
However, we know that your sole aim is to avoid a rational discussion centered around the challenges to your precious religion.
:yawn: We went through all this in that other thread.You haven't settled it. 6days says populations evolving, speciation, and natural selection happen and are part of the "Biblical model of creation". You say they never happen.
So the only way to settle it is for either 6days to now say those things never happen, or for you to say they do. Which one of those occurred?
Great. Then you will have seen my post disagreeing with Six and you would have seen his clarification. :up:I did, several times.
So let me see if I have this right....I'm noting that 6days says populations evolving, speciation, and natural selection happen and are part of the "Biblical model of creation", and that you say they never happen. And given that, I'm asking both of you which one is the more accurate description of "the Biblical model of creation".Neither one of you will answer and both of you have spent days and days and days dodging and avoiding this question. Yet somehow I'm the one who's avoiding rational discussion?This is why creationists are such a joke the world over.Now how about you just man up and engage in a rational discussion?
Or you could just pick one of us and have a conversation
Why are you so determined to avoid the question?So you both agree that the earth is 50,000 years old?
If you want to know what Six believes, ask him. You already know what I believe.Ok, I'm picking you. Which happened? Did 6days change and say those things (populations evolving, speciation, natural selection) never happen, or did you change and say they do?
If you want to know what Six believes, ask him. You already know what I believe.
Trying to prove to you that Six and I are on the same page is boring enough; trying to convince you that we've already settled this is like watching grass grow — in a sandpit.
If you cared, you'd read the thread. However, we know that your sole aim is to avoid a rational discussion centered around the challenges to your precious religion.
Be sure and read the questions you haven't responded to. :up:
False... You just need to believe what God's Word says.
Then you still maintain that populations never evolve, speciation never happens, and natural selection never happens. That's what you stated to me before.
Now we'll see if 6days agrees, as you suggest.
What a childish response. "I'd answer, but it's boring". Like I said, this is how I can tell you're not operating in good faith.
Only an evolutionist could possibly believe that broccoli and salmon are the same kind of thing.
(They aren't)
Its not about the percentage difference in DNA.What percent difference in DNA would there have to be, to make two things, two different "kinds?"