End of Roe Vs Wade?
- Thread starter Lon
- Start date
Red Wave Rising
Yuge
Candace is my other girl 
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Pray for the murdered children
Pray for the evil people in our society
Pray that the Supreme Court gets this right
www.washingtonexaminer.com
Pray for the evil people in our society
Pray that the Supreme Court gets this right
Leaked draft opinion signals Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade - Washington Examiner
The Supreme Court is undoing Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 case that led to the creation of a constitutional right to abortion, according to a leaked draft majority opinion. The document, obtained by Politico, is for the case known as Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization and references...
www.washingtonexaminer.com
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
And a quick search of Twitter shows LOTS of people talking about packing the court
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
"explain that to your daughters and granddaughters"
You mean the ones you didn't murder in the womb, right?
'cause it'd be kinda hard to explain it to the daughters and granddaughters you murdered in the womb.
All 31 million of them.
Because they're dead.
Because you murdered them.
You disgusting selfish woman.
You mean the ones you didn't murder in the womb, right?
'cause it'd be kinda hard to explain it to the daughters and granddaughters you murdered in the womb.
All 31 million of them.
Because they're dead.
Because you murdered them.
You disgusting selfish woman.
Idolater
"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
I'm just spamming the following links
Rebecca Kiessling - Wikipedia
Conceived in rape
Nick Vujicic - Wikipedia
No limbs in the womb
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
It's a risky issue for them to magnify. They're dependent on the Hispanic vote and Hispanics largely oppose abortion.
musterion
Well-known member
It's another scam.
1. It's supposedly only a draft, not a decision. Possibly might not even be a draft.
2. Was released (not leaked) to do three things:
a. Create insta-protests {done}
b. Give corrupted SC an excuse to back off from Roe forever {oh no, they're already getting "threats"}
c. Gin up outrage turnout for midterms where Leftist vote fraud is being taken more seriously
If I turn out to be wrong I'll cop to it. Until then, I am not falling for any of this. The supposed new conservatives on the SC have already proved faithless hacks.
1. It's supposedly only a draft, not a decision. Possibly might not even be a draft.
2. Was released (not leaked) to do three things:
a. Create insta-protests {done}
b. Give corrupted SC an excuse to back off from Roe forever {oh no, they're already getting "threats"}
c. Gin up outrage turnout for midterms where Leftist vote fraud is being taken more seriously
If I turn out to be wrong I'll cop to it. Until then, I am not falling for any of this. The supposed new conservatives on the SC have already proved faithless hacks.
musterion
Well-known member
Profanity or implied profanity is not allowed.
Astroturf. Premix white version of BLM that, you'll recall, vanished the second Trump was gone. Riots For Hire.
Everything now is MODERATOR EDIT: Profanity removed. Everything.
Pray for the murdered children
Pray for the evil people in our society
Pray that the Supreme Court gets this right
Leaked draft opinion signals Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade - Washington Examiner
The Supreme Court is undoing Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 case that led to the creation of a constitutional right to abortion, according to a leaked draft majority opinion. The document, obtained by Politico, is for the case known as Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization and references...
Amazing. Its almost too good to be true. Its probably another pre-election Russian Dossier sort of scam to get the democrat voters to the polls
Idolater
"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
This is 100% about the freedom to have out-of-place marital relations without consequences. That is the libertarian dream for pro-aborts. We've been living in a libertarian dreamland since Roe. Now that we have to consider something as dreadful to them as 'forced births', they are losing their minds, or acting like it.
Or acting like it.
Or acting like it why? Because of the freedom to have out-of-place marital relations without consequences.
(And the married so-called people who also want to reserve their right to abort, that's also out-of-place marital relations. Marital relations is open to life, just like the bishops said.)
Exceptions to the above prove the rule, but here are two reasons for exceptions to the above, so you don't misunderstand them.
Nick Vujicic - Wikipedia
Rebecca Kiessling - Wikipedia
Sure we all agree, that no one would wish these circumstances on their enemy, let alone their neighbor, those circumstances are pretty wretched. But the question is, Is it better to just not exist? These two fine examples of abortion survivors (they are two of the most vulnerable people in the whole universe while in the womb) unreservedly say No! Even given these skubalon-y circumstances, if my choice is either this, or not existing, I'll take existing!!!!
But pro-aborts act like they're being merciful, they act like they're God, not like they're 'playing' God, they're acting like they are God. "It's a mercy, it prevents suffering, we're so good and holy, and 'conservatives' are heartless."
At what point, starting at conception, would it not be murder to have ended either of the lives of the two fearfully and wonderfully made people in the links above? Mr. Vujicic and Mdm. Kiessling?
... Pro-aborts just want to protect a created right, to have out-of-place marital relations with no consequences is all. Losing their libertarian dreamland means they can't just be promiscuous anymore and always have abortion as a fallback option.
This issue isn't about anything other than that. And if the Supremes do 'overturn' Roe, all they'd be saying is that that's not in the Constitution.
(If it turns out that the Supreme Court in spite of credible threats on their lives and limbs or those of their families, does overturn Roe, all they're saying is that the right to have out-of-place marital relations without consequences isn't in the Constitution, nor was it in any of the minds of the framers, nor is it consonant with the moral theory of the founders, based upon "inbuilt" (@Arthur Brain ) human rights. A utilitarian libertarian legal positivist has no problem discovering the right to abortion within the right to privacy, which is discovered within the 'penumbra' /shadow of the 14th amendment. "Originalists" do.)
Last edited: