glorydaz
Well-known member
Since it appears my point was muddled with a few witty comments (which drew more attention), I will rephrase it. I believe the problem here is surrounding the idea of "gender identity". First, what state rule does the author refer to? There are no specifics here given by the author. Second, there is an issue if this is left up to personal interpretation instead of concrete limitations, which is what laws do, right? In short, I have questions, not answers. :think:
Questions, but no answers. Words, but no common sense. :chuckle:
What does "personal interpretation" have to do with adults of the opposite sex using a wrong bathroom?