Dude Gets Naked in Women's Locker Room

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
Dude Gets Naked in Women's Locker Room - What 'Transgender Equality' Laws Have Wrought

We knew this was coming and we told you this was coming, yet many people still refuse to believe us.

Even as I write these words, different cities in America are considering dangerous and irrational laws that impose unfair and potentially dangerous burdens on the vast majority of citizens, all in name of helping a tiny number of deeply confused individuals. When will we learn?

To put it simply, you are guaranteeing trouble when you effectively make public bathrooms and locker rooms gender neutral. It is an experiment in social madness, and it is completely without justification, no matter how much we care about men and women who struggle with gender identity issues.

Many of us in the pro-family movement have warned for years that so-called anti-discrimination laws that include "gender identity" and "gender expression" as categories open the door to a host of potential problems and abuses.

First, these laws do not consider the needs of a multitude of women and children who will feel quite uncomfortable when a biological male comes walking into their bathroom or locker room, understandably so.

(Note to LGBT activists: The fact that a biological male dresses like a female does not make women and children feel any more comfortable.)

Second, there is no way to keep heterosexual predators out of the ladies' rooms, since a heterosexual male could simply pose as a woman to satisfy his voyeuristic (or worse) desires.

Yesterday, in Seattle, "A man undressed in a women's locker room, citing a new state rule that allows people to choose a bathroom based on gender identity."

As reported by Krem.com, "It was a busy time at Evans Pool around 5:30pm Monday February 8. The pool was open for lap swim. According to Seattle Parks and Recreation, a man wearing board shorts entered the women's locker room and took off his shirt. Women alerted staff, who told the man to leave, but he said 'the law has changed and I have a right to be here.'"

Was he transgender? Heterosexual? Something else? Does it matter? If he feels he should be able to use the women's locker room, he can, and no one can stop him.

In the words of pool regular Aldan Shank, "Sort of works against the point they're trying to make. They're causing people to feel exposed and vulnerable with the intention of reducing people feeling exposed and vulnerable."

When I posted this report on my Facebook page, a woman named Kati commented, "This is VERY real. This new policy that was recently adopted by our local YMCA in WA allows for people to use whatever locker room they self-identify with. Just two weeks ago a boy around the age of 13 walked right into the girls side of the women's locker room. All he did was sit down and scroll through his phone. Little girls where surprised when they came in from showering with their towels wrapped around them to see him sitting there. My daughter was one of those girls. This policy opens the door to those who have malicious intent."

What kind of lunacy is this?

Last year, at a Planet Fitness gym in Midland, Michigan, Yvette Cormier was in the ladies' locker room when a man, dressed as a woman, entered the locker room. According to local ABC News, "Cormier, who had been a Planet Fitness member for two months, said she went to the front desk immediately. The man at the desk told her that Planet Fitness policy is 'whatever gender you feel you are, that's the locker room you're allowed to go in,' she said.

When Cormier warned other members about the Planet Fitness policy, her own membership was revoked.

Even more alarming, in 2012, in Olympia, Washington, female high-school students sharing a college campus swimming pool were shocked to see a naked, 45-year-old male student who identifies as "Colleen" sitting in their sauna. (The police report stated that "she" was exposing "her male genitalia.")

The girls were traumatized and the parents outraged, but college officials said they could not do anything because of state policies against gender-identity discrimination: "'The college has to follow state law,' Evergreen spokesman Jason Wettstein told ABC News affiliate KOMO. 'The college cannot discriminate based on the basis of gender identity. Gender identity is one of the protected things in discrimination law in this state.'"

Adding to the insanity is the fact that it was subsequently discovered online that Colleen also identifies as a lesbian and is strongly attracted to women, in other words, just like most heterosexual males. Yet it is perfectly legal for Colleen to sit in a sauna with naked teenage girls.

Who can possibly justify abuses like this?

Last October it was reported that, "The University of Toronto (U of T) is temporarily changing its policy on gender-neutral bathrooms after two reports of voyeurism in a student residence.

"Two women showering in Whitney Hall, a residence at U of T's University College, reported they saw a cellphone reach over the shower-stall dividers in an attempt to record them, in two different incidents, police Const. Victor Kwong told The Toronto Star."

But of course. Is anyone surprised?

Recently, before speaking at a chapel service for a Christian middle school and high school, I stopped in the restroom, which, I discovered, was in the elementary school wing of the building.

As I walked out, three little boys walked in, perhaps 6 years old.

I thought to myself, "How could any adult possibly think that it is fair to these little boys to have a confused little girl use their bathroom, or a confused little boy use the girls' room?" And how could any adult possibly think that it was fine for a confused (or opportunistic) teenage boy to share a locker room with teenage girls?

Yet in schools across the nation, this is hardly a theoretical question. In fact, in an extraordinary example of government overreach, last November a headline announced: "Department of Education orders school to allow boys to use girls' locker rooms, showers."

It'a time we say enough!

I urge every man or woman of conscience and decency to stand against these laws while, at the same time, working to help those who are gender-confused get to the root of their struggles.

This social madness must stop.

So wrong and so disgusting.
 

Quetzal

New member
Yesterday, in Seattle, "A man undressed in a women's locker room, citing a new state rule that allows people to choose a bathroom based on gender identity."

As reported by Krem.com, "It was a busy time at Evans Pool around 5:30pm Monday February 8. The pool was open for lap swim. According to Seattle Parks and Recreation, a man wearing board shorts entered the women's locker room and took off his shirt. Women alerted staff, who told the man to leave, but he said 'the law has changed and I have a right to be here.'"
The trouble here is the use of the term "gender identity". I am not sure this outcome is what they had in mind...

Was he transgender? Heterosexual? Something else? Does it matter?
Sure it matters. Although, I do not expect someone who uses the term "Dude" in an article title to understand it.

What kind of lunacy is this?
An isolated incident that should be remedied by clarity over time. But I don't expect the author to stop here, I fully suspect a conservative "think of the children" cliche any moment now.

Recently, before speaking at a chapel service for a Christian middle school and high school, I stopped in the restroom, which, I discovered, was in the elementary school wing of the building.

As I walked out, three little boys walked in, perhaps 6 years old.
Right on cue...
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
if you sent them into a restroom, would you be bothered that there was an adult of the other gender in there, naked?
 

Quetzal

New member
if you sent them into a restroom, would you be bothered that there was an adult of the other gender in there, naked?
I'm not sure what I would do because something like that hasn't happened to me. Further, I would have to question how often this is happening. The author would have the reader believe this is happening all the time, everywhere, to everyone. I highly doubt this is the case. There are, of course, questions to this hypothetical we are talking about. When you say naked, as in, just standing by the sink wear no clothes? Certainly questionable behavior regardless of the sex of the individual.
 

Quetzal

New member
Yet didn't get the title (use of dude)?
I did, but it is slang and an unprofessional choice of verbiage. Shows immaturity and a lack of professionalism in the writer. Makes me call the article into question before I even read the first line. Nevertheless, the article is questionable in many other areas but the title isn't a good start.
 

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
I did, but it is slang and an unprofessional choice of verbiage. Shows immaturity and a lack of professionalism in the writer. Makes me call the article into question before I even read the first line. Nevertheless, the article is questionable in many other areas but the title isn't a good start.

Well you are showing your true liberal bent these days, focused more on the title of an article, rather than its contents, you know like critiquing the cover of a book, instead of what its about. Sad.

Its also a blog post, not a news article, if you bothered to check the link.

Since lib's though routinely use references to pop culture way more often in actual newspaper articles - i will remember how unprofessional and questionable it must be and skip it entirely, thanks for the education. (sarcasm)

PS, since the title alone, causes you such distress, why did you enter the thread, we notice you still havent responded to the issue.
 

genuineoriginal

New member
Even more alarming, in 2012, in Olympia, Washington, female high-school students sharing a college campus swimming pool were shocked to see a naked, 45-year-old male student who identifies as "Colleen" sitting in their sauna. (The police report stated that "she" was exposing "her male genitalia.")

The girls were traumatized and the parents outraged, but college officials said they could not do anything because of state policies against gender-identity discrimination: "'The college has to follow state law,' Evergreen spokesman Jason Wettstein told ABC News affiliate KOMO. 'The college cannot discriminate based on the basis of gender identity. Gender identity is one of the protected things in discrimination law in this state.'"

Adding to the insanity is the fact that it was subsequently discovered online that Colleen also identifies as a lesbian and is strongly attracted to women, in other words, just like most heterosexual males. Yet it is perfectly legal for Colleen to sit in a sauna with naked teenage girls.

I fully suspect a conservative "think of the children" cliche any moment now.
The 45 year old self-identified "lesbian" male was definitely thinking of the children.

It is a pity that you don't see that as a problem.
 

Quetzal

New member
Well you are showing your true liberal bent these days, focused more on the title of an article, rather than its contents, you know like critiquing the cover of a book, instead of what its about. Sad.

Its also a blog post, not a news article, if you bothered to check the link.

Since lib's though routinely use references to pop culture way more often in actual newspaper articles - i will remember how unprofessional and questionable it must be and skip it entirely, thanks for the education. (sarcasm)

PS, since the title alone, causes you such distress, why did you enter the thread, we notice you still havent responded to the issue.
You don't do well with criticism, do you? Yeesh, if I had a dollar for every misguided conclusion in this post I could retire. :eek:
 

Angel4Truth

New member
Hall of Fame
You don't do well with criticism, do you? Yeesh, if I had a dollar for every misguided conclusion in this post I could retire. :eek:

wow, you are having a retarded day.


I didn't create the title of the article, i post the title the author created to give them due credit when i cite their material. Which you would know if you were actually concerned about the link and information (article) -but thank you again for not checking and assuming :)
 
Top