God did not chose Jacob over Esau because of their works, but purely on election.God knew who would fight for Him. Don't you get it? God knew!
God did not chose Jacob over Esau because of their works, but purely on election.God knew who would fight for Him. Don't you get it? God knew!
I have no idea what you are talking about.Simple.
You have said we teach that all of the promises were to all of Abe's descendants.
That's a lie you tell.
We do not teach that.
Nope.
Scripture plainly says that Jacob was chosen over Esau before either of them did anything right or wrong.
Romans 9 KJV(11) (For the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works, but of him that calleth
Did you catch that?
Not of works, but purely by God's election.
Oh?Flesh counts for nothing.
You do not understand that do you.
Flesh counts for nothing.
You do not understand that do you.
Knowing every work that both children ever did would be irrelevant to why God chose Israel.God knew what each child would grow up to do.
I never said otherwise.God did not have to pick the first born Esau because he was the first born!
God will perform His oaths, not for Israel's sake, but for His own holy name's sake.
Ez. 36:21-34 KJV
But I had pity for mine holy name, which the house of Israel had profaned among the heathen, whither they went. Therefore say unto the house of Israel, thus saith the Lord GOD; I do not this for your sakes, O house of Israel, but for mine holy name's sake, which ye have profaned among the heathen, whither ye went. And I will sanctify my great name, which was profaned among the heathen, which ye have profaned in the midst of them; and the heathen shall know that I am the LORD, saith the Lord GOD, when I shall be sanctified in you before their eyes. For I will take you from among the heathen, and gather you out of all countries, and will bring you into your own land. Then will I sprinkle clean water upon you, and ye shall be clean: from all your filthiness, and from all your idols, will I cleanse you. A new heart also will I give you, and a new spirit will I put within you: and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh, and I will give you an heart of flesh. And I will put my spirit within you, and cause you to walk in my statutes, and ye shall keep my judgments, and do them. And ye shall dwell in the land that I gave to your fathers; and ye shall be my people, and I will be your God.
I will also save you from all your uncleannesses: and I will call for the corn, and will increase it, and lay no famine upon you. And I will multiply the fruit of the tree, and the increase of the field, that ye shall receive no more reproach of famine among the heathen. Then shall ye remember your own evil ways, and your doings that were not good, and shall lothe yourselves in your own sight for your iniquities and for your abominations. Not for your sakes do I this, saith the Lord GOD, be it known unto you: be ashamed and confounded for your own ways, O house of Israel. Thus saith the Lord GOD; In the day that I shall have cleansed you from all your iniquities I will also cause you to dwell in the cities, and the wastes shall be builded. And the desolate land shall be tilled, whereas it lay desolate in the sight of all that passed by.
You do not even get the name right.Knowing every work that both children ever did would be irrelevant to why God chose Israel.
The scripture says Jacob was chosen by election, not works.
I never said otherwise.
The order of their births had no more to do with it than their works did.
And yet, work away your sins, you feel you must continually work at, in your own strength.
You are welcome to your view until fully persuaded otherwise, just know that in mine, GT shall regrettably continue to be short for "Gerbils' Treadmill."
Oh?
If flesh counted for nothing, then Jesus did not have to be a descendant from the flesh loins of David.
Acts 2 KJV
(30) Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne;
Romans 1 KJV
(3) Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh;
Learn to read what all is written.
You are arguing about God's written Word.
Jesus is the one who says the flesh counts for nothing.
You miss Jesus' teaching.
Works of the law = circumcision regarding Jacob and Esau? They were both circumcised. Esau tried to work for his being chosen. He went out and provided venison for Isaac. Jacob was sneaky...he pretended to be Esau by putting fake hair on his body because Isaac was nearly blind. That isn't exactly what a good Christian man would do, and yet who got the blessing???
The one who did no work at all, in fact, he was disobedient to the moral law.
Works of the law = circumcision regarding Jacob and Esau? They were both circumcised.
Actually Tambora has swerved into something that matters here, but it is difficult to understand people NOT seeing the significance of what they are saying about Christ. Tambora doesn't seem to realize that this feature WAS fulfilled in Christ the seed of David, and thinks the logic is that if Christ was actually that descendancy then it goes forward into the future and really matters. The NT does not say that. It says that the kind of fulfillment in Christ was the target and terminal of it all. For what he did is then offered to the whole world.
It is fascinating in Acts 13's sermon to see that Isaiah is quoted as shifting David's promises to the Servant (Christ) and then shortly after that Paul points out that David did fufill the purpose God had for him IN HIS OWN GENERATION. So if that short-term thing was fulfilled, why go back to it after the official reading of Isaiah by Paul?
Tamb said this up above:
Oh?
If flesh counted for nothing, then Jesus did not have to be a descendant from the flesh loins of David.
Response: yes he did have to be a descendant of David, but what he did in the Gospel is a complete fulfillment of what was expected. Yet most of the people/authors I know never think of the Gospel as having anything to do with acting as David's seed. Instead it's about 'salvation.' And the two realms have nothing to do with each other. That's not how Rom 1 and Acts 2 and 13 read.
I did not know people did not understand that Jesus is the promised Savior to David and that it was fulfilled, as stated in the scriptures.