drbrumley
Well-known member
It is not saying anything about Father, Son and HS make one God.
You project things to suit your doctrine.
Great answer if you actually answered the question. The question is how many are in that verse?
It is not saying anything about Father, Son and HS make one God.
You project things to suit your doctrine.
I tested this link to make sure it is working.I can't. It keeps saying link cannot be found. But I think I know where you're going with this. But I dont want to assume. So that's why I asked, so what?
Great answer if you actually answered the question. The question is how many are in that verse?
I tested this link to make sure it is working.
The Origin of the Trinity: From Paganism to Constantine
by Cher-El L. Hagensick
http://www.heraldmag.org/olb/Contents/doctrine/The Origin of the Trinity.htm
that is some lengthy link.
This is manipulative and trick question. It is not an honest question, dear.
You are trinity believer, what else is new?
Those involved in Philosophy were the Gnostics, they introduced the Sunday Sabbath, Trinitarianism, Hell, Messiah worship, authority of the Pope; the titles, Father, Lord, Rabbi, Teacher, Master.
There were two different groups of Gnostic's during the first centuries AD.
The first group of Gnostic's were opposed to Christianity.
The other group of Gnostic's were not opposed, and joined Pagan notions to Christianity.
The Gnostic Christians believed in Sunday Sabbath, authority of the Pope, and Trinitarianism, while the Judaizing Christians were opposed to such things as Catholicism [Universalism.]
1 Tim 6:20
"O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called."
The "oppositions of science falsely so called." is the opposition to Jewish and Pagan Gnosticism.
Science is "gnosis" in the Greek.
Philosophy and Gnosticism is the "profane and vain babblings" the Congregations had to combat.
Albert Pike, a high prophet of Freemasonry, spoke on the origin of Trinitarianism. In his secret book "Morals and Dogma" he says of the Kabbalist "Jews were the direct precursors of Gnosticism," their Kabbalist doctrine is derived from their captivity while in Babylon.
Philo of Alexandria was a Jew who played a key role in the development of the Trinitarian theory. Pike says, he was a Kabbalist "a initiate of the mysteries."
Philo introduced the idea of a trinity to the Hellenistic Jews of Alexandria.
Philo did not equate the three members of his trinity. He wrote that “the middle person of the three,” was Yahweh, the Father of the Universe, who is uncreated and unbegotten. God, the Father of the Universe was accompanied by two “body-guards”: the creative power and the royal power. God being greater than them. These ideas of Philo made a great impact on Christianity.
Trinity
In the fourth-century, Marcellus of Ancyra declared that the idea of the Godhead existing as three hypostases came from Plato, through the teachings of Valentinus. Valentinus is quoted as teaching that God is three, three prosopa (persons) called the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit:
These men also taught three hypostases, just as Valentinus the heresiarch first invented in the book entitled by him 'On the Three Natures'. It was believed he was the first to invent three hypostases and three persons of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit, but he was discovered to have taken this from Hermes and Plato.
Valentinus (also spelled Valentinius) (c.100 - c.160) was known as a early Christian Gnostic Theologian.
It should be noted that Nag Hammadi library Sethian text such as Trimorphic Protennoia identify Gnosticism as also professing Father, Son and feminine wisdom Sophia or as Professor John D Turner denotes, God the Father, Sophia the Mother, and Logos the Son.
The Catholic Encyclopedia, II, page 263:
"The baptismal formula was changed from the name of Jesus Christ to the words Father, Son, and Holy Spirit by the Catholic Church in the second century."
No, just a question. I have no idea what your answer will be. Maybe you see one person. I really dont know what goes on in that head of yours
I don't play your manipulative game for your doctrine.
Have you ever studied about Pagan trinities during the days of Abraham?
The Origin of the Trinity: From Paganism to Constantine
by Cher-El L. Hagensick
http://www.heraldmag.org/olb/Contents/doctrine/The Origin of the Trinity.htm
This link has also been tested.
Jesus nor any of His disciple did not say you have to believe in the trinity to be saved.
It is that simple. Why do you make your doctrine to ostracize Jesus' followers just because they don't agree with your doctrine? Jesus did not do it, why should you?
Jesus nor any of His disciple did not say you have to believe in the trinity to be saved.
It is that simple. Why do you make your doctrine to ostracize Jesus' followers just because they don't agree with your doctrine? Jesus did not do it, why should you?
Is meshak trying to reply to me after her rudeness
Your comment here fails to address the OP's question, which I've answered in Post #3 above.Knowing Jesus heart to heart is the only means of being saved from the wrath to come.
I am sorry if I offended you. I just don't play manipulative games.
You have to believe in Jesus. And to believe in Jesus, mean's that you want to be the best Christian you can be, not the best person; but the best Christian you can be. (You can be the best person you can be, without believing in Jesus. People try to do that all the time.)Jesus nor any of His disciple did not say you have to believe in the trinity to be saved.
It is that simple. Why do you make your doctrine to ostracize Jesus' followers just because they don't agree with your doctrine? Jesus did not do it, why should you?