Augustine believed that Mary was a perpetual Virgin and sinless. Calvinists admire this guy, can you believe it?
Augustine himself was a strong believer in Catholicism. I would suggest deleting him as one of your "Heroes of Calvinism?" Do a study on the history of Augustine who was a Priest and Bishop of the Catholic Church.
:doh:
Newsflash: Everyone in Augustine's time were believers of 'Catholicism', in the state of which the Church was in at the time. There was no other Christianity.
Also
Augustine is the most important theologian in Christian history. But, make fools of yourselves speaking against him :wave:
:up:Old St. Augustine was a very strong Catholic believer. Anything derived out of the depths of Catholicism ought to be held with suspicion and extreme doubt!
Thank you - you proved my exact point...true.
Most August of you...indeed :chuckle:
MADism is 19th century falsehood, along with Mormonism and Seventh Day Adventists. You can keep your Darbys, Smiths, and Whites- they all lived in a notably heretical age when odd Christian sects were popping up everywhere, particularly in America.
MADism became most popular because of it's Christian Zionist undertones- perfect for the pompous American idiot
Oh sure! Coming from someone who likes to sit in the dark at Mrs Mendelbright's drinking nectarine crushes and listening to Leonard Blush 45s.
:darwinsm: As if Mormons or 7th Day A's preach the gospel that Paul preached. They don't and therefore are accursed (Galatians 1:8-9 KJV). You cannot say that about "MAD"!MADism is 19th century falsehood, along with Mormonism and Seventh Day Adventists.
MADism is 19th century falsehood, along with Mormonism and Seventh Day Adventists. You can keep your Darbys, Smiths, and Whites- they all lived in a notably heretical age when odd Christian sects were popping up everywhere, particularly in America.
MADism became most popular because of it's Christian Zionist undertones- perfect for the pompous American idiot
Typical Agustinian reasoning INTO a thing.
Might as well assert that because the advances in greater understanding in various fields that have arisen in the last several decades have arisen in the same era as Radical Islam, they are therefore just as wrong.
Right here is where it becomes a simple matter to call your Augustinian "reasoning INTO a thing" what it is...stupid.
Plain and simple.
Spiritual morons - lets go back to the Civil era of sawing off limbs - later advances in the understanding of such things as gangrene and so on, were "later developments" and are therefore...wrong.
Fools - you're still lauging AT the first automobile - never mind the advancement in understanding of a thing its development had merely represented to everyone but your fool kind.
:rotfl:
:darwinsm: As if Mormons or 7th Day A's preach the gospel that Paul preached. They don't and therefore are accursed (Galatians 1:8-9 KJV). You cannot say that about "MAD"!
Not so Heir.
They all preach Christ crucified.
They and MAD are all guilty of adding things fit to be burned.
:darwinsm: As if Mormons or 7th Day A's preach the gospel that Paul preached. They don't and therefore are accursed (Galatians 1:8-9 KJV). You cannot say that about "MAD"!
MADism is 19th century falsehood, along with Mormonism and Seventh Day Adventists. You can keep your Darbys, Smiths, and Whites- they all lived in a notably heretical age when odd Christian sects were popping up everywhere, particularly in America.
MADism became most popular because of it's Christian Zionist undertones- perfect for the pompous American idiot
:doh:
Newsflash: Everyone in Augustine's time were believers of 'Catholicism', in the state of which the Church was in at the time. There was no other Christianity.
Also
Augustine is the most important theologian in Christian history. But, make fools of yourselves speaking against him :wave:
Augustine was the key culprit behind the introduction of reading a thing INTO the passages, in contrast to allowing the passages to read exactly as written, followed by comparing the passages with one another, for their intended sense.
Unable to let go of Augustine's strong influence given all the centuries his system of reading INTO a thing had been the norm, the Reformers, as enamoured with him as they were, soon turned what little Pauline light they had accidently stumbled on - soon made that little light the spoil of Augustine's heretical approach, once more.
And with that, what little Dispensational (Pauline) truth had once more seen the light of day after all those centuries, was Replaced once more by man's wisdom in its own conceits.
When one thinks on it - there are actually only two MAJOR schools of thought - Pauline...and Augustinian...
Not ironicaly, both are mentioned in Romans 11:25, centuries before Augustine's heretical approach - the Greek's approach to wisdom (Mystic Rationalism) spoken AGAINST by Paul, in Cor. 1:22, where he also speaks against Empiricism (walking by sight, or one's physical senses and or emotion).
Is this an accurate view of Mid-Acts Dispensationalism ( MAD )?[/B]
Your "IGNORANCE" is appalling. You don't even KNOW what MAD means, yet, you curse it with every fiber of your being. Someday, it may come back to haunt you?
@[URL="httg the word: A scriptural necessity[/COLOR][/COLOR]
5. The new covenant did NOT begin with the birth of Christ
[C
AMR[/COLOR][/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE]
[/B]
Your "IGNORANCE" is appalling. You don't even KNOW what MAD means, yet, you curse it with every fiber of your being. Someday, it may come back to haunt you?