Nang
TOL Subscriber
So I guess that means I should not trust you at all, but suspect of you of lying, too?
ECT Do those who believe MAD have no problem disregarding what Jesus actually taught ?
- Thread starter dodge
- Start date
So I guess that means I should not trust you at all, but suspect of you of lying, too?
Nang
TOL Subscriber
:chuckle:
Hi and how about telling ALL what 2 Cor 12:1 really means , IF YOU CAN ??
I am refer to Tele !!
dan p
Right Divider
Body part
It just shows how you're uninformed.
In that case, how about you and I make a personal deal not to trust what each other has to say? That way, neither one of us can deceive the other. Sound good?
Mary did not stop being his mother, so what you just stated has no point- in fact, it wouldn't have any point spoken to a Catholic either, because they do not see Mary as part of the Trinity or any such thing.
You all are anti-Catholic to a point of retardation.
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
Hey Danoh.
Here's an interesting take on the subject of possessions from a Dispensationist who actually does what you claim.
That is looks at what's written from the big view.
He doesn't seem to be MAD.
https://bible.org/seriespage/8-profession-and-possession-acts-432—511
Here's an interesting take on the subject of possessions from a Dispensationist who actually does what you claim.
That is looks at what's written from the big view.
He doesn't seem to be MAD.
https://bible.org/seriespage/8-profession-and-possession-acts-432—511
Last edited:
Alert the "Archdiocese!"
...
You're not very bright are you?
1Mind1Spirit
Literal lunatic
He's biased by his Madness.
When Ananias and Saphira kept back part of the money, Peter told them it was their own money to do with what they wanted as well as the land before they sold it.
Which means they were not required to sell it to begin with.
It was a freewill offering.
What makes it bad is they wanted to look good with their gift.
Hence the lie.
They also all knew Jesus said Jerusalem would be destroyed in their lifetime and they wouldn't have need of those things anyway.
Interesting things when one begins to wonder why God killed em, hunh?
Catholicism doesn't preach the "Grace Gospel" that will lead one to eternal life. It's the Gospel that "The Apostle Paul" preached. The ONLY Gospel for this "Dispensation of Grace" that we live in.
Can you show us Scripture that will back up this assertion of yours?
You sure SOUND like a Catholic to me. "If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck alright."
The same can be said of you. So, I think I'll say it. "You're not very bright are you?"
Danoh sounds as if he's a "Fence-sitter" when it comes to MAD?
musterion
Well-known member
Interplanner
Well-known member
That's starting down another irrational path from the truth. The DofJ has no affect on the A&S show-of-sacrifice issue. The money from those sales funded the mission to all the nations, which is what God's interest was. Money was needed right away to get the mission out, and it did reach from Spain to India in that generation.
In general the apostles believed the end of the world in judgement was 'right after' (Mt24:29) the DofJ. There were some allowances for delay, and it was delayed. But for most of that generation, there was a call to throw everything at the mission in that generation.
Interplanner
Well-known member
Every reference to the destiny of Jerusalem in Jesus' sayings is about this. It was declared desolate in Mt 23, but the event itself was protracted.
Where in Scripture are you getting all of this? Is it just your opinion or can you back it up? I don't remember reading any of this in the Bible? Are you just making an assumption?