Interplanner
Well-known member
Do either of you know what a landmine is?
:french:Do either of you know what a landmine is?
:french:
Based on the way you redefine things, I'm not sure.
Not if I don't touch your false interp landmine.In this context, and there is context, it would mean an item that would completely explode what you are saying.
Not if I don't touch your false interp landmine.
Paul does NOT say that there is ONLY one gospel in ALL of the Bible.
Read this: http://theologyonline.com/entry.php?3469-Another-gospel-in-Galatians-1
You poor enraged baby. Get some help.I AM NOT GOING TO HAVE YOU LECTURE ME ABOUT BOOKS AND THEN TELL ME TO 'READ THIS' NON-BIBLICAL RAG!!!
So you NOW finally admit that there is MORE than ONE gospel in the Bible.You get enraged, too. You're full of it. My rage is that you constantly chide books and then guess what? you can't show anything plain from a text so...'you have to go read this other non-biblical item.' Right. Why should I believe you.
The grammar of Gal 2 is what matters. The grammar does not support two gospels. You may have half a chance in Heb 4 but you have a knack for picking the wrong support passages! Anyway Heb 4's 'gospel' is only about that wilderness generation, not the current one.
There is also the 'gospel' of getting back to the land from exile in Isaiah. Obviously good news. However, it dissolves in view of Christ and what he would accomplish for Israel and for the nations at once.
I'm having a hard time following your fallacious logic.The logic of you and your pals is below appraising. In your post, You just validated what Judaism was doing to the Gospel of Christ, making YOURSELVES the same enemy of Paul that they were!!! Of course there was another one--the bedeviled one! Gal 3:1.
Enjoy your position, and your stupidity.
"Ambassadors for Christ" is perfectly plain speech about the mission in 2 cor 3-5. 2P2P is convoluted, circuitous junk theology about the 3 main NT statements about the new covenant.
Judaism and 2P2P alike are a way of reading the OT as though the NT never happened is entirely plain speech but will make you puke when you realize what you are doing.
re previous quote 'what is the gospel of the circumcision?'
This is the belief that Gal 2's grammar supports a 2nd gospel. It is an elementary greek grammar mistake, and the passage does not support it. The grammar shows that the preaching was one and the same, especially given the context of the anathema by the same writer, 10 verses earlier, about 2nd gospels. But 2P2P never was good at paying attention or context, only at creating discord and incoherence.
Quit messing around with the obvious.
Do either of you know what a landmine is?
Enjoy your position, and your stupidity.
Huh?
:idunno: soliloquy maybe?
Beats me, brother steko. :chuckle: