SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
And quit fracturizing the bible, you dispy wackos.
Look Esmerelda, you need to focus on the mission, and quit catering to your creepy little brother.
And quit fracturizing the bible, you dispy wackos.
I thank/like any post that makes a good point and also those that add to the discussion. So far, you haven't qualified in either of those. Heck, I even thank Nang and GodsTruth when they make a valid point, when they state truth, even though they believe differently than I do.
I thought posting a PO question might be a contribution, but I guess not. What cognitive dissonance world do you live in?
Do you know people who continually enter other people's conversations?
Look Sam, you're going to have to start posting some coherent thoughts.
That's the time, Mayor!
What cognitive dissonance world do you live in?
Hi and just threw in that angels were the first sinners and you got one right , that angels can not be redeemable !!
Under #2 you say that there were commands to be broken , so name a few , but from Adam to Moses and is there a name for them ??
What is a PATTERN , ot type , and do you understand TYPE ??
In 1 Tim 1:16 Paul is a PATTERN for those that were saved after Paul !!
You did quote a good verse in Rom 2:12 , so will say it is the GOSPEL OF NO LAW !!
Looks like you are a proponent of at least 2 gospels , is what I see !!
Gen 4:4 does not mention the NEW COVENANT and since you mentioned it , How can anyone be saved under that Covenant and explain how salvation is sure !!
My fingers are very numb and am having trouble !!
"Thou shalt not kill" ring any bells?
The pattern in the verse you quoted is simply that Paul was the chief of sinners. As bad as sinners are ever going to be, Paul saw himself as the worst. Paul comes first in the sinner list, as far as he was concerned. Therefore the pattern is simply that if Paul could be saved, so could anyone.
Gospel means "a news that is too good to be true, but it is true". People judged by conscience have no news.
I didn't mention that verse.
I could say the same about your theological understanding.
Poor confused little IP.Since the Bible looks like it has two programs--if you don't follow what the NT says about the OT--Chafer helped create 2P2P so that the Bible "made sense." all of them got the "twots" in the process, continually inventing two of everything mentioned in the NT, down to today when we have two Gospels in Gal 2, and therefore two gods in 2:8 (using the same grammatical clunkings), and now two Gentiles (one that's Jewish!) when translating 'Hellenistas' in Acts 8-12.
Since the Bible looks like it has two programs--if you don't follow what the NT says about the OT--Chafer helped create 2P2P so that the Bible "made sense." all of them got the "twots" in the process, continually inventing two of everything mentioned in the NT, down to today when we have two Gospels in Gal 2, and therefore two gods in 2:8 (using the same grammatical clunkings), and now two Gentiles (one that's Jewish!) when translating 'Hellenistas' in Acts 8-12.
Address a specific or shut up.
Your FALSE premises all lead you to immense confusion.Address a specific or shut up.
Your FALSE premises all lead you to immense confusion.
Like this: "what the NT says about the OT"
You are TOTALLY confused about what the NT is and therefore you are WRONG about what the OT means in God's plans.
-if you don't follow what the NT says about the OT-
Your FALSE premises all lead you to immense confusion.
Like this: "what the NT says about the OT"
You are TOTALLY confused about what the NT is and therefore you are WRONG about what the OT means in God's plans.