Another creationist who didn't do his homework and offers up the wrong definition for things. Wonder where he was when the Earth was created in 7 days. I want to see the footage. Is it on YouTube?
You guys all disagree on the definition of things. Who is the final authority on evolution anyways. Which of the conflicting Scientists should I go with. Maybe some of those guys who produced hoaxes to teach evolution.
The burden of proof is on you not me here. Your little debate strategy of countering my argument is pathetic. The Bible says it is by faith [sound reasonable faith, not a leap] that we believe God created the heavens and earth. You don't see my faith teachings in public school books do ya?
However you laugh at me for believing that a omnipotent God created the earth in seven days. Buddy, you got to be kidding me. Do you actually know what you believe? Your trying to tell me that all this complex universe came from nothing, now that would be one for youtube! :box:
Just a few examples and DNA too.
A few examples of people speculating over bones does not impress me. So whose DNA do you have? I would also like to point out that similarity could also mean a common designer.
Where do you get that selection implies intelligence. That is so ridiculous. If you have one animal that can survive heat and another that cannot in a heating climate, the former will survive due to the selective pressure of the heat. There is no intelligence here. You really don't know what selective pressure means.
If selective pressure is true then why is there so many different species?
Redo it in lab? Then have god demonstrate creation in a lab. Creationists love to use the word theory against scientists because they think it sounds flaky. But a theory is build on observable principles and falsification tests. We can see things everyday that support the larger extrapolations we make and give us greater confidence in the likelihood of a theory. It's about finding the most consistent complete answer we can given the evidence we have. God conveniently decided not to leave any evidence of his involvement behind. Too bad. And no complexity doesn't imply a complex source.
First, Christianity is not in the PUBLIC school textbooks so the burden of proof is on you. Second, after reading some of these posts I can begin to see the real spirit at work behind these theories taught as fact. The subtle arguments really posed at God by you atheists and evolutionists I believe proves these verses to be true...
2Pe 3:3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts,
2Pe 3:4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as [they were] from the beginning of the creation.
2Pe 3:5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water:
2Pe 3:6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:
2Pe 3:7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
2Pe 3:8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day [is] with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
2Pe 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
I have refuted your arguments and now given you more material for my position.
My appeal to you is to come clean and submit yourself to God. :king:
