nikolai_42
Well-known member
A lot of this is good but I do not want to be led astray.
Indeed, traditions or settled modes of thought are hard to break. Which is troublesome if they are wrong.
A lot of this is good but I do not want to be led astray.
I think that you understand.Indeed, traditions or settled modes of thought are hard to break. Which is troublesome if they are wrong.
My understanding is that the Son does not predate the Father, but I have no evidence of this.
Consider that the son is the exact image of the Father so the son came after the Father. The Father was alone until he created his image. Heb 1
I am not sure what you are saying.Consider that the son is the exact image of the Father so the son came after the Father. The Father was alone until he created his image. Heb 1
Keypur, what does "eternally" mean?
If God created all through his son then then son was created before time itself.
An image needs a subject to be an image of, God was alone before he created his exact image.
All images are creations. Can you name one that is not created?
I am not sure what you are saying.
You didn't answer my question.
Keypurr, what does "eternally" mean?
The son is the express IMAGE of the Father, the Father is a spirit, so is the son. The son was used by the Father to created everything in heaven and earth. Heb 1, Col 1:15. The Son is the Lord of ALL creation, made so by his Father.
No, you didn't.You just don't get it JR. I fully answered your question.
Jesus was born many years after the creation, but the logos was at the creation.
Yes, Jesus was born as flesh when He became flesh and blood and dwelt among us.
The triune GOD could not purchase with HIS own blood unless at least one of them (Father, Son, Holy Spirit) were to have blood.
So when scripture says GOD purchased with HIS own blood, we know that the Son was of the triune GOD.
Acts 20 KJV
(28) Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.
I do not know why you imply that Jesus is a spirit or that the Father is a spirit.
The Spirit of God and the Spirit of Christ are the same Spirit I am believing, even though the words mean or describe something different.Lol - keypurr's point goes to show that even a stopped clock is still right, at least twice a day.
Romans 8:9 But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now if any man have not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of his.
That's another Trinitarian verse, by the way.
Nehemiah 8:8
I do not know why you imply that Jesus is a spirit or that the Father is a spirit.
No, you didn't.
And once again, you have dodged my question.
Keypurr, please answer the question I ask, and not the question I did not.
What does "eternally" mean?
I do not know how to answer you. But I do have an idea.I did not say Jesus was a spirit, I said the true Son is a spirit. The Son at the creation was NOT Jesus, it was the Spirit he was give at his anointing, remember the dove. The logos (true Son)became flesh in the body prepared for him/it, see Heb 10:5.
The Spirit of God and the Spirit of Christ are the same Spirit I am believing, even though the words mean or describe something different.
Is Jesus God become a man, or a man who is God come to earth, or neither?