DocJohnson
New member
So it's OK to own one percent of black people as slaves?
You're jumping from one unrelated topic to another.
So it's OK to own one percent of black people as slaves?
∅2L84U;2196369 said:Something is either true or it isn't. Are you suggesting that those who support abortion with exceptions are unfamiliar with the arguments that suggest it's still murder to punish an innocent person for a crime committed by someone else?
As a Christian, would you be willing to stand along side someone who denies that Jesus rose from the dead or that He is God in the flesh, to bring the Gospel to the world? How could you do that with a clear conscience?
How do you suggest convincing them, so that you can support them and join them in the battle? If THEY do not stand with the truth, THEY stand against it. How can it be otherwise?You're confusing me with someone who doesn't know the difference. I absolutely do.
What I'm saying is that vilifying, demonizing, and protesting someone because they only agree with you 99% is not going to convince them that they're 1% wrong.
∅2L84U;2196415 said:How do you suggest convincing them, so that you can support them and join them in the battle? If THEY do not stand with the truth, THEY stand against it. How can it be otherwise?
ProlifeProfiles.com doesn't chase anyone away. It merely states well known political and media personalities actual stance on abortion.Chasing them in the opposite direction is going to help how exactly?
ProlifeProfiles.com doesn't chase anyone away. It merely states well known political and media personalities actual stance on abortion.
If they choose to see their own stance as a threat maybe they should reconsider their own stance.
Again, I'm directing my anger towards those who actively vilify, demonize, and protest individuals who agree 99% with our cause.
Do you think it would be wrong if well known evangelists/pastors/teachers/etc. were exposed for denying an essential of the faith? Don't you think it's important that the millions of people who think someone is pro-life are informed that they are not?Again, I'm directing my anger towards those who actively vilify, demonize, and protest individuals who agree 99% with our cause.
∅2L84U;2196516 said:Do you think it would be wrong if well known evangelists/pastors/teachers/etc. were exposed for denying an essential of the faith? Don't you think it's important that the millions of people who think someone is pro-life are informed that they are not?
∅2L84U;2196516 said:Do you think it would be wrong if well known evangelists/pastors/teachers/etc. were exposed for denying an essential of the faith? Don't you think it's important that the millions of people who think someone is pro-life are informed that they are not?
When the truth has been revealed and the person refuses to acknowledge it, what do you suggest be the next step?Informing someone is one thing.
Vilifying, demonizing, and protesting is another. :mmph:
∅2L84U;2196553 said:When the truth has been revealed and the person refuses to acknowledge it, what do you suggest be the next step?
Do you just randomly hit keys on your keyboard hoping to make sense, or do you just like being a nuisance?getting in touch with reality
∅2L84U;2196553 said:When the truth has been revealed and the person refuses to acknowledge it, what do you suggest be the next step?
I suppose it's beyond the comprehension of the emotionally attached to simply ask them to move on to the next person?
Why not?The answer certainly is not to vilify, demonize, and protest someone who agrees with you 99%. :mmph:
tol⋅er⋅ate [verb] - to allow the existence, presence, practice, or act of without prohibition or hindrance; permit; support; to endure without repugnance; put up with.
This means you have to be able to tolerate anything and everything under the sun. I, for one, cannot and will not do that.
Do you tolerate those who rape, murder, steal, lie, cheat, etc.?
I sure don't.
Tolerance is evil becase it means you have to be permissive of everything, including evil.
No, I'm trying to make a point. It is not OK to kill 1% of the unborn!You're jumping from one unrelated topic to another.
∅2L84U;2196720 said:What does this mean?
∅2L84U;2196720 said:Why not?
∅2L84U;2196814 said:Doc, on another thread you said...
Why are you willing to "tolerate" this?
No, I'm trying to make a point. It is not OK to kill 1% of the unborn!
Supporting those who support murder?Tolerate what, exactly?