I'm willing to do the same, of course.
I would even vote for an Indie or two if they're more conservative than the RINO or Leftist Dem running against them.
do you understand how federal judges get on the court?
I'm willing to do the same, of course.
I would even vote for an Indie or two if they're more conservative than the RINO or Leftist Dem running against them.
If one is willing to compromise on killing babies, then your compromise has no limits.
hey, I am waiting for you to point out all those republicans who support federal funding of abortion
it is your job
do you understand how federal judges get on the court?
Yep. They're appointed. A conservative Indie can do that also.
hey, I am waiting for you to point out all those republicans who support federal funding of abortion
it is your job
The health insurance plan offered to employees of the Republican National Committee includes coverage for elective abortions, a fact that could compromise the party's insistence that abortion be left out of any health care reform measure.
But GOP Chairman Michael Steele, who is presumably covered by the Cigna health plan,...While he describes himself as "pro-life," he has has said that he views abortion as an "individual choice" and has also voiced support for the funding of some types of stem-cell research.
If a person supports any type of abortion (say cases of rape and incest) then that person is pro-abortion.Do you mean supporting abortion only in certain cases or supporting abortion carte blanche?
Coincidentally I saw this on the news a few days ago:
http://rawstory.com/2009/11/gop-health-insurance-abortions/
How about the GOP Chairman? Does he count?
If a person supports any type of abortion (say cases of rape and incest) then that person is pro-abortion.
There is simply no other way to see it.
If a person supports any type of abortion (say cases of rape and incest) then that person is pro-abortion.
There is simply no other way to see it.
I would have to disagree with this (is that allowed here). I really think it means that they are pro-abortion with exception. Logically, it's still murder.I agree, but at least they're 99% on our side.
Less than 1% of abortions are done for reasons of rape and incest.
It sounds like you are a moron.it sounds like you all would rather argue about who is pro-life than try to figure out how to reduce the number of abortions
Should we try to compel them to be 100% on our side or accept our differences? (after all, we are talking about human lives here)I agree, but at least they're 99% on our side.
Less than 1% of abortions are done for reasons of rape and incest.
Of course.∅2L84U;2196180 said:I would have to disagree with this (is that allowed here).
Well said. :up:I really think it means that they are pro-abortion with exception. Logically, it's still murder.
It's like stealing your neighbors TV, because some 3rd party stole yours. No matter how you look at it, you're still a thief.
Should we try to compel them to be 100% on our side or accept our differences? (after all, we are talking about human lives here)
Vilifying them, demonizing them, and protesting them isn't compelling them to do join our cause. :mmph:
Vilifying them, demonizing them, and protesting them isn't compelling them to do join our cause. :mmph:
So it's OK to own one percent of black people as slaves?I agree, but at least they're 99% on our side.
Less than 1% of abortions are done for reasons of rape and incest.
Reduce or end? What do you choose?it sounds like you all would rather argue about who is pro-life than try to figure out how to reduce the number of abortions
Something is either true or it isn't. Are you suggesting that those who support abortion with exceptions are unfamiliar with the arguments that suggest it's still murder to punish an innocent person for a crime committed by someone else?Vilifying them, demonizing them, and protesting them isn't compelling them to do join our cause. :mmph: