Spam, which you spam on every thread, to whomever disagrees with your made up jazz.
No, moron, if he had not died for my sins, my sin debt, which is defined by an existing law against it, I would not be saved. The sin debt, the I.O.U.,the certificate of indebtedness, not the holy law of God itself, was what was nailed to the cross.
You cannot be this stupid.
You, not "apparently," are obviously an idiot. He was talking to the Galatians, moron, who were trying to be justified by law keeping, like you do, through your vicarious law keeping satanic assertion;the law existed, at that time, moron, and Paul was admonishing/rebuking them, for attempting to be justified, through keeping the law-that, was the context. Apparently, you are too stupid, or demon possessed, to see that Paul was not asserting, and never did assert,that because believers are not under the jurisdiction, judgment, of God's holy law, that it no longer exists, it has been voided, has been destroyed, as you satanically assert. It had to exist, moron, for it define what sin is.
Slower: pardoning someone for committing a capital crime, doesn’t do away with the law that was broken. If anything, it shows that the law carries force, for without the pardon, the criminal would die!
In the same way, the law of God carries force since breaking it (committing sin) requires the death penalty. The law is that powerful, that important. It is holy. People aren’t saved from that which was against them (the death penalty) by doing away with the law. What saves people from death is the death of the Lord Jesus Christ in the place of those who trust 1 Cor. 15:1-4 KJV.
In fact, the wording Paul employed Colossians 2:13-14 showed that the law of God continues to carry great force. By saying the penalty demanded under the law of God was nailed to the instrument that killed the Lord Jesus Christ, Paul was showing that the law of God was still in force, still requiring death for sin.
By contrast, if the law had been brought to an abrupt end by the death of the Lord Jesus Christ, from that point on, nothing would be “against the law”-duh! Nothing could be called “sin.” Of course, we know that is not true. Sin exists, which means the law that calls it “sin” also exists!
You, not "apparently," are obviously an idiot, moron, who is so prideful, he cannot think straight, which is why not only the lost laugh at you, most members of the boc do also, and :call you" on your made up assertions, which are not from the scripture, but from what you read others say the bible teaches, from other web sites.
