Like the popes words are infallible? The New Testament condemns works religion. If you are trusting in your works or in what you are or in what you have become, then you are not a Christian.
the pope says that I am
Like the popes words are infallible? The New Testament condemns works religion. If you are trusting in your works or in what you are or in what you have become, then you are not a Christian.
Yes of course.Can a Roman Catholic be a Christian?
Everybody has a supreme pastor. Whether it's the pope, or someone else who acts a lot like the pope, or they make themselves into their own pope.If not, then why not?
(Do not other churches have their little popes?)
Yes of course.
Everybody has a supreme pastor. Whether it's the pope, or someone else who acts a lot like the pope, or they make themselves into their own pope.
Everybody has a supreme pastor.
Your supreme pastor is the one who judges what is, and what is not, "faithful teaching."There are a group of pastors, mainly with the Lord now, I listen to and find trustworthy. I don't believe any like-minded would ever say anything but that we listen to each other, but there is only Jesus Christ supreme, in anything, and no gospel of man, only the gospel of Jesus Christ. I don't have nor have ever had any supreme pastor man nor certainly self, rather the communion of those in Christ of scripture, a list of names of revered pastors I could not say who was better than the other, each having their own merit, just as their own personalities, and, again, only Christ supreme, to any of us.
So, I believe you must speak for Catholics, who have a supreme man, or maybe Mormons with their Prophets, any cults who have their exclusive prophets, people preaching some man's gospel, whatever, but you can't lump everybody into having some supreme man. I know I don't, but for the God-man. It's even more apparent it's the Holy Spirit and scripture that's the supreme influence in the lives of believers, no man. I have only ever listened to any man, to the extent he faithfully teaches the things of God from scripture, not for their person, nor any claim of their person. All true men of God I've known are humble and avoid like the plague being put on a pedestal, would rebuke anybody doing this. As a matter of fact, show me some supreme man, and I'll show you a cult! After all, isn't true Christianity much to do with the supremacy of Christ alone?
TOL doctrines are just getting curiouser and curiouser. Is there some "Church of the Latter Day Supreme Man" I missed? Got a link to a congregation, with this doctrine everybody has a supreme man? Did you get than from a Bob Dylan lyric? Or is this like some guru? I was wondering, because maybe you have Christianity confused with Hinduism? They have supreme men. And cows.
Anyway, as to the OP, yes a Catholic can be a Christian, many so, despite themselves.
'Sounds like it's you.
All I had to do was plod through that wall of text of a post of yours to find how full of crap you are. You said, not me, "I have only ever listened to any man, to the extent he faithfully teaches the things of God from scripture, not for their person, nor any claim of their person." How do you know "to what extend he faithfully teaches?" How do you determine that, exactly?Some people find a hearing aid helpful for their comprehension problems.
My opinion on this probably won't be popular. Belonging to a specific denomination or flavor of Christianity does not make a person a Christian.
The admonition in scripture is quite simple.
Acts 16:31 -- And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.
As human beings we tend to make it harder than it really is, the Catholic Church included.
Still spewing ignorance...as usual.Still spewing lies... as usual.
Yes, the entirely non-authoritative opinions fed to you by your preferred recently-invented, man-made non-Catholic sect are noted. (Again.) :yawn:There is absolutely no proof of your claims other than your churches prideful self proclamation. History does not back your claims at all, and scripture itself has to be full of lies to believe what you do.
Already answered (Post #31).The Pope is a Romanist...he is NOT a Christian by any stretch of the imagination.
WOW CabinetMaker!! Well said. I seldom agree with you, but I totally agree with every word here.CabinetMaker said:Of course they can! So can Mormons and JW's and a great many others who attend churches that "we" don't see a being really Christian. A Christian is determined by who they put their faith in, not what pew they sit in. I think it is much MUCH harder to be a follower of Christ in certain denominations, but that does not automatically mean that a person is not a Christian.
Can a Roman Catholic be a Christian?.........
In seven words you created the stupidest post in forum history. My hat's off to you.
No thanks, the stupidity of this thread is enough for one day. That goes for the rest of your dumb post that didn't quote too.I am glad you liked it.
See my other thread too.........
Not only can they be Christians, Catholics are the original Christians, the Catholic Church having been the only Christian Church in existence for the first millennium-and-a-half of Christian history, and having continued as Christ's one historic Church right down to our own day.
For example, see THIS and THIS.
In fact, Christ's one historic Church was already commonly referred to as "the Catholic Church" by the end of the 1st century A.D.---a good two centuries BEFORE Constantine legalized the Christian religion in Rome. Better try again.Rome made Christianity it's state religion, and beforehand, it was just a pagan church. It did nothing but usurp whatever Peter's Seat was and became a gentile Pharisee.
So, you are agreeing that Catholics can be Christians, but it does not make them a Christian? The name above the church door might indicate what theology is taught there, but the building...the denomination....the leader do not save. The only name on the door that matters is found in John 10:9Cruciform said:In fact, Christ's one historic Church wasalready commonly referred to as "the Catholic Church" by the end of the 1st century A.D.---a good two centuries BEFOREConstantine legalized the Christian religion in Rome. Better try again.
Better try again.