Ooops, I'll go back and edit that.Why no you read what wrote I, ...?
No other comments besides on my typing skill ?
Ooops, I'll go back and edit that.Why no you read what wrote I, ...?
No, it is you misreading what I wrote.That's you saying God creates not-good things,....
Of course not.Even things He can't do, like deny Himself?
I realize that.Contrary to your stupidity, God cannot do everything; and you blaspheme Him by saying He can, since, by doing so you are saying (among other things) that God can love evil, and that God can believe falsehood (like, for instance, the proposition that God is evil).
But you used the direct quote function in your post to flagrantly to misquote my words thus:What part of "the leopard cannot change his spots" and "the Ethiopian cannot change his skin" (Jeremiah 13:23) do you not get, Bible-denier?
I never write a comma immediately followed by a question mark, because that is as dumb as to separate a question mark from the last letter of a sentence by a space, and other frequent stupidities engaged in by the semi-literate. I'm fine with simple leading or ending truncations of my text, or use of ellipses to show where portions of my text have been removed by the excerptor, when people use the direct quote function. But you have committed quote-mangling against me, trying to make it appear that I printed a comma immediately before my question mark: "get,?" Believe me, you Bible-denier, if you keep up that foul practice, I will have no qualm against flagging you on it to the TOL moderators. Please own your foul, and correct your error.What part of "the leopard cannot change his spots" and "the Ethiopian cannot change his skin" (Jeremiah 13:23) do you not get,?
What did you respond to ?That's yet another idiotic, meaningless phrase, and a non-response from you.
Please stick to the topic.I wrote:
But you used the direct quote function in your post to flagrantly to misquote my words thus:
I never write a comma immediately followed by a question mark, because that is as dumb as to separate a question mark from the last letter of a sentence by a space, and other frequent stupidities engaged in by the semi-literate. I'm fine with simple leading or ending truncations of my text, or use of ellipses to show where portions of my text have been removed by the excerptor, when people use the direct quote function. But you have committed quote-mangling against me, trying to make it appear that I printed a comma immediately before my question mark: "get,?" Believe me, you Bible-denier, if you keep up that foul practice, I will have no qualm against flagging you on it to the TOL moderators. Please own your foul, and correct your error.
I had stated:No, it is you misreading what I wrote.
I wrote..."Had been a sinner...yes."
To which you responded:According to your vicious heresy, a new creature has been a sinner.
That's you signifying your agreement with what I had stated; that's you agreeing with the fact that, according to your vicious heresy, a new creature has been a sinner. Don't respond with a "yes" to the fact I have stated if you don't agree with the fact I have stated, you vicious, lying fool.yes.
It was your mindless reaction. Duh. LOLWhat did you respond to ?
hint...(it was my response.) LOL
You've been warned. Better not continue your practice of quote-mangling.Please stick to the topic.
Otherwise I won't be able to tell if you are learning anything.
I have quit posting your accusations.
They make you look childish and I didn't want future readers to think poorly of you.
It is written..."When they heard these things, they held their peace, and glorified God, saying, Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life." (Acts 11:18)
If you wish to differentiate between granted and offered, feel free.
If there is no repentance...from sin, there will be no salvation.
Sorrow without change is worldly sorrow. (2 Cor 7:10)
It worketh death.
That is an error.
Only the "nature" of the unregenerated is mired in sin.
Your bandage
was my cure.
"Had" been...once was a sinner.I had stated:
To which you responded:
That's you signifying your agreement with what I had stated; that's you agreeing with the fact that, according to you..., a new creature has been a sinner. Don't respond with a "yes" to the fact I have stated if you don't agree with the fact I have stated,....
Quit editorializing, and I will be able to quit editing your posts.You've been warned. Better not continue your practice of quote-mangling.
You said God did not offer repentance to salvation to men.AMEN!
What, did you think I wouldn't agree with this passage?
I am "hoping" I will be, when God declares it on the day of judgement.It means offered, given. If you have a problem with that, take it up with Luke... Oh wait, you won't be able to, because you aren't saved...
When they heard these things they became silent; and they glorified God, saying, “Then God has also granted to the Gentiles repentance to life.”
Bible Gateway passage: Acts 11:18 - New King James Version
When they heard these things they became silent; and they glorified God, saying, “Then God has also granted to the Gentiles repentance to life.”www.biblegateway.com
Here, you are admitting that you're not in this thread to respond to what others have written, but to instead carry on with yourself.You failed to notice the re-wording I responded to.
You said God did not offer repentance to salvation to men.
Why would God offer mankind repentance from sin
That's not what God offered.
He offered SALVATION from sin and death, if we repent to God.
Repenting from sin does nothing, except shows your humility!
It's simply an acknowledgement that "I can't do this on my own, and I need a Savior to save me from my sin."
Letting go of the rope is not continuing the struggle of climbing the rope!
I provided a verse to help change your mind.
I am "hoping" I will be, when God declares it on the day of judgement.
Only the "nature" of the unregenerated is mired in sin.
Would you like me to start quote-mangling against you, as you've been doing against me, and are here threatening to continue doing against me? Too bad, Satan-seed; not gonna happen.Quit editorializing, and I will be able to quit editing your posts.
Yet you also contradict it by saying:I realize that.
Why do you so hate logic?God can do anything.
I agree with what you wrote, but used better English to do so.Here, you are admitting that you're not in this thread to respond to what others have written, but to instead carry on with yourself.
Question: Why would you use theView attachment 8113 function to address your post to me, quoting something I had written, and pretend (by saying "yes") to agree with what I had written, only to turn around and say that you do not agree with what I had written, but were saying "yes" to something you wrote, instead?
Answer: Because you are a non compos mentis troll.
If you wish to "re-do" my use of English to a more readable form...please do so.Would you like me to start quote-mangling against you, as you've been doing against me, and are here threatening to continue doing against me? Too bad, Satan-seed; not gonna happen.
I agree with what you wrote, but used better English to do so.
"New creatures had been sinners."