I'm off for the night... I look forward to reading what each of you write.... (EXCEPT MESHAK)...
All Grace and Blessing to each of you! (Except Meshak... She needs to be broken, dusted, watered and Reformed by our Divine Potter!!!)
Hello EE
I'm off for the night... I look forward to reading what each of you write.... (EXCEPT MESHAK)...
All Grace and Blessing to each of you! (Except Meshak... She needs to be broken, dusted, watered and Reformed by our Divine Potter!!!)
Shut your mouth! I would forfeit all my theology and co-cling to John 5:39f and Ephesians 2:8f for any of those that believe Jesus is God and our salvation!
I rebuke you!
May the Love of Christ Jesus Lord, God and Savior break your hardened Pottery!
You remain completely off base .
God never rejected the reprobate according to His foreknowledge of their actions. God rejects reprobates according to His will.
God formed all men, either for dishonor or honor, according to His willful purposes and good pleasure.
To reject this truth is disbelief and a rejection of Sovereign God Himself.
It is those not written in the Lamb's Book of Life that are reprobate and who will deservedly suffer hellfire
Did you know that the doctrine of Unconditional Election is directly counter to Open Theist beliefs? Do you realize that the Reformed Faith is a systematic theology totally founded on Holy Scripture alone?
Nick explained nothing. Nick went off the OP by accusing me of believing and teaching something foreign to my actual beliefs. He does not theologically comprehend my beliefs enough to call them erroneous.
Sure . . .
Indeed,...'God' is both within space-time dimensions and without space-time dimensions. All space and time arises as relational points within infinity. The infinite is ever the womb from whence all space-time relativity and definitions arise and appear....while the infinite is ever immanent within as well as transcending creation, in a pan-en-theistic fasion, is my view
Panentheism (from the Ancient Greek expression πᾶν ἐν θεῷ, pān en theṓ, literally “all in God”[1][2]) is the belief that the divine pervades and interpenetrates every part of the universe and also extends beyond time and space. - wiki
This understanding is universally rational and logical, so an emphasis of 'Open Theology' appears unnecessary really if this is already understood, unless the OV has risen as a counter-re-action to some other extreme form of classical theism which denies that God can also be in time, while the very fact of omnipresence posits God's presence everywhere, in all space and time. So,...not really much of a point of OV, unless to emphasize or correct something it perceives as being misconstrued or neglected, and whatever other nuances it feels it brings to one's understanding of God's relationship to us, in time
Those of us more metaphysically liberal and eclectic in our studies, I gather have always assumed that 'God' is both within and without time. The infinite by definition, is also a 'totality' of ever expanding potentiality and possibility,..... a merging synthesis or interaction between the infinite and finite. - that very tension of 'inter-action' is 'creation'.
I believe Calvin himself did say God reprobates some for his own good pleasure and no one has the right to question it. If he didn't say it, many of his inheritors have because it's the inescapable logical counterpart to election.
I am a little unsure of what you are seeking, from the phrasing in your OP. However, I would add that one should read Scripture with logical reasoning, and criticism/skepticism.
Now, I know this sounds like an atheist or some kind of Bible denier, but allow me to explain what I mean. If you were reading a bill passed by congress, you would naturally read it with criticism and skepticism, right? Your literal reading will not alter the words or their meanings, in any capacity. But will you not question the motives, perspectives, reasons, etc for the items found within the bill? The same applications can be made to any history book. So, if we approach all other books and literature with this attitude, we should do likewise with the Bible.
I know that Scripture is without error and is sacred. I am not questioning that in any way. As a matter of fact, criticism and skepticism, when utilized in Scripture, proves this to be true. The error always comes in when a person reads their doctrines and biases into the Word. They perform some very impressive mental gymnastics to apply their beliefs to Scriptures.
And this is where logical reasoning comes into play. If you want an honest and open discussion of doctrines, any and all Scriptures utilized should be read with logical,unbiased approaches. For example, I cannot dismiss any verse simply because it goes against my doctrines. I must attempt to understand the perspective of the opposition, search out proofs for and against their arguments, and above all, compare it with the Scriptures themselves. Most logical arguments and doctrines attained from Scripture will not falter to questioning or criticisms. There will be no contradictions. Thus, if one's doctrines cannot withstand scrutiny, then a logical and reasonable approach has not been exercised when reading the Scriptures.
For Our Living, Breathing God...
Thanks, and yes....I did notice somewhat of a 'dogmatic' view of this from the Enyart crowd. I recall watching just a portion of Bob's debate with James White over this too, it was a hoot,...especially with their after-debate comments towards each other. I do love Jame's work with the KJV-only issue, but would have to re-watch this particular debate in full, for a better analysis over it.
Breathing?
God inhabits all of creation, most of which is airless, a vacuum.
Why condemn others who believe the scriptures?
Joh 1:14 And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.
Mat 16:15 He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?
Mat 16:16 And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. Mat 16:17 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.
Mat 16:18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
Joh 20:31 But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name.
LA
"The Living Breathing God"... (Gen. 2:7)
The breath of life is spirit. When the spirit leaves the body the person is dead.
God imparted spirit to Adam and he lived until his spirit left him some years later.
Nang said:"God never rejected the reprobate according to His foreknowledge of their actions. God rejects reprobates according to His will.
God formed all men, either for dishonor or honor, according to His willful purposes and good pleasure.
To reject this truth is disbelief and a rejection of Sovereign God Himself"
Jesus Answered... "I AM... The Way...
I AM... The Way... to the Father, the God of all.
I'm not certain... but this link appears dead now. Have you changed your mind on these words [MENTION=7292]Nang[/MENTION]?
NEVER.
Quote Originally Posted by Nang
"God never rejected the reprobate according to His foreknowledge of their actions. God rejects reprobates according to His will.
God formed all men, either for dishonor or honor, according to His willful purposes and good pleasure.
To reject this truth is disbelief and a rejection of Sovereign God Himself"
I believe in the absolute sovereignty of Jesus Christ, my Savior, for He is the Creator God of all, and all souls were created by Him, through Him, and for Him. (Col. 1:15f; 17f)
Even the dishonorable. Romans 9:21
You are kind of marring the name "Calvinist".