biology, not your subjective "feelings"

[glassjester]

I don't....as I don't think it's possible.

Then how do you know whether a particular act is a perversion or not?

 

[quip]

Incorrect.

Wrong. HIV is no more inherent to homosexuality than it is to heterosexuality. Though both hold the possibility to contract it.

Do you understand what inherent means?

I've no idea the percentages of promiscuity percentages in media in anything under rated R but I expect very low. CERTAINLY under 60% of currently produced television EXCEPT for, yep, you guessed. A husband and wife don't have to kiss, and seldom do in cartoons. Even the kid in the Princess Bride didn't like 'kissing books.' Why, then, would it be bigoted to object? I think, rationally, even you with your narrow and self-centered adult mind, could follow some conclusions logically to their end: Some material is just not appropriate in 60% of current programming and certainly not under PG-13 (for you know, pubescent 13 year olds). Some people are entirely too free with their lips... TooPDA

Too prudish? Well yeah! What am I an animal? I don't "need" to see what others are doing. Ward doesn't have to kiss June every episode. Isn't it really unnecessary and over-the-top .... and objectionable if that's what they do 60% of the time?

View attachment 25406

(I thought this was a transgender thread... :think: )

This is no more than your typical, self-righteous bluster.

 

[quip]

Then how do you know whether a particular act is a perversion or not?

Whether it preys on another; causes unsolicited harm (intentionally or unintentionally) for personal sexual gratification.

 

[glassjester]

Whether it preys on another; causes unsolicited harm (intentionally or unintentionally) for personal sexual gratification.

By your standard, is incest a perversion?

 

[Stripe]

So?

Because that is the subject of this thread.

Feel free to be somewhere else. :up:

 

[Stripe]

Why not keep heterosexuality out of the public sphere.

Because it's not a perversion. :duh:

 

[jgarden]

biology, not your subjective "feelings"

The question remains as to how the authorities intend to enforce transgender public washroom legislation short of strip-searching everyone who enters?

 

[glassjester]

biology, not your subjective "feelings"

The question remains as to how the authorities intend to enforce transgender public washroom legislation short of strip-searching everyone who enters?

Of course, anybody who does a convincing enough job at cross-dressing will get away with it.

The laws, I think, are so when a business owner tells someone who's quite obviously male to get out of the women's bathroom, the store can't be sued or prosecuted for discrimination.

 

[quip]

Because it's not a perversion. :duh:

It sure is....doser and I've established that.

 

[quip]

By your standard, is incest a perversion?

No, rather a sexual taboo.

 

[Crucible]

Why not keep heterosexuality out of the public sphere..et al.?

:doh:

That's how children are born. It is the most fundamental thing of human prominence.

Why do we even need to bring these things up :think:

 

[glassjester]

No, rather a sexual taboo.

So do you believe incestuous couple should be allowed to marry?

 

[ok doser]

It sure is....doser and I've established that.

nope

you took what i said, twisted it and ran off on wild flights of fancy

i dint bother last night trying to correct you

 

[Crucible]

nope

you took what i said, twisted it and ran off on wild flights of fancy

That's their trade; they misrepresent everything to cater to their ideology lain:

i dint bother last night trying to correct you

Last night was a night indeed.
For me
Plenty of tequila and cheap beer :chuckle:

 

[quip]

So do you believe incestuous couple should be allowed to marry?

There is the genetic disorder thing...which is likely the driving force behind the taboo and laws against.

Otherwise, it's none of my biz. :idunno:

 

[quip]

nope

you took what i said, twisted it and ran off on wild flights of fancy

i dint bother last night trying to correct you

I just followed your logic...you just didn't like where it landed.

 

[ok doser]

I just followed your logic...

nope, as i said, you twisted it and ran off in bizarre directions

it was amusing to watch :thumb:

 

[quip]

nope, as i said, you twisted it and ran off in bizarre directions

it was amusing to watch :thumb:

T'was already twisted...what's one more twist? :chuckle:

Amusing indeed!

 

[dodge]

What exactly do you think he's doing on that pulpit? He doesn't acknowledge credentials in given fields and he even says he isn't going to cite the bible as counter, so what does that leave him with?

Common sense !

 

[Arthur Brain]

Common sense !

Hardly...