HIV is not inherent to homosexuality nor exclusive to it.
Are you arguing against promiscuity...if so, why the obsessed, exclusive focus on homosexual promiscuity?
biology, not your subjective "feelings"
- Thread starter Tambora
- Start date
HIV is not inherent to homosexuality nor exclusive to it.
Are you arguing against promiscuity...if so, why the obsessed, exclusive focus on homosexual promiscuity?
uhhh...the personal act = private
Homosexuality, writ large; maintain the right to freely express the former... = marching.
Are you really this thick or simply desperate?
Employing doser's absurd logic: Heterosexuality is thus a perversion as it allows for perversions such as bondage and foot fetishes and thus can justly be placed within the same perverse category as pedophilia.
I'll assume - being a hetero - you don't agree with this assessment?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
No, I didn't claim what you suggest at all oh sad one. Try to keep along without adding your own rock born spin on things dude...
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
ok, then explain how they keep it private over there in england while marching in public
No.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
And yet they are and sometimes they can behave like monsters.
Just how much suffering has been inflicted on people under the guise of "religious morality" do you suppose CS? Zealous fundamentalism will have its fair share on that score...
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
do you believe that pedophilia is a perversion of normal sexuality?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
well, however you roll over there - over here they're not interested in keeping it private
ClimateSanity
New member
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
bearing in mind that the proportion of the population that identifies as pedophilic is estimated to be greater than the portion of the population that identifies as homosexual, how do you define "normal sexuality"?
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
What, and you're the spokesperson for that are you?
Lon
Well-known member
Incorrect. That community makes up 50% of the entire population of those affected. They also represent the same number of all transmitted diseases and are only 1% of the population. It is a bad behavior, simply based on the ills that are obtained in the process. There is no ability, frankly, to deny that. You can't 'make up' a census report.
I've no idea the percentages of promiscuity percentages in media in anything under rated R but I expect very low. CERTAINLY under 60% of currently produced television EXCEPT for, yep, you guessed. A husband and wife don't have to kiss, and seldom do in cartoons. Even the kid in the Princess Bride didn't like 'kissing books.' Why, then, would it be bigoted to object? I think, rationally, even you with your narrow and self-centered adult mind, could follow some conclusions logically to their end: Some material is just not appropriate in 60% of current programming and certainly not under PG-13 (for you know, pubescent 13 year olds). Some people are entirely too free with their lips... TooPDA
Too prudish? Well yeah! What am I an animal? I don't "need" to see what others are doing. Ward doesn't have to kiss June every episode. Isn't it really unnecessary and over-the-top .... and objectionable if that's what they do 60% of the time?
View attachment 25406
(I thought this was a transgender thread... :think: )
ClimateSanity
New member
The bible lays out Gods morality in black and white.
I don't....as I don't think it's possible.