annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
It isn't being reported my the MSM because it doesn't fit the preferred politically advantageous narrative. We live in the days of "Black Lives Matter," not "All Lives Matter" (and certainly not "White Lives Matter"). If a 25 year old White guy walked up to a Black kid and shot him in the head, it would be headline news throughout much of the Western world. But because a Black guy shot a White kid in the head, the current zeitgeist doesn't allow for much reporting on that. Sweep it under the rug, because we can't use it to advance our political agenda!
The right is going full-bore at this very moment advancing this poor little boy's murder for their own political agenda. As a mother to boys myself, I spent years watching them ride their bikes with big smiles on their faces, and I cannot imagine the agony of the father who prayed for God to save his son as he lay dying. It's horrifying to me as it is to any parent and anyone with a heart. I will not politicize that little boy's death by arguing over it, not in this thread and not in any other thread made to politicize his death. So this is my one post to you on the subject.
When I did my own search, not surprisingly Stormfront popped up (I thought they were defunct but I guess not) and a white supremacy blog I won't drive traffic to with a mention, along with all the other usual right wing blogs, forums, and websites which foster clicks and views by putting race fear in the hearts of white conservatives.
It seemed to me a crime such as this would make local news first and then move to national. So I popped in CBS and found a local CBS website with the news two days before the breathless "where's the MSM article" and a day before FoxNews picked it up. I didn't spend more time than that but it was enough to deflate the "no MSM" meme for me.
Here's the thing though, and where I disagree somewhat with your post. From my vantage point (not presuming to speak for Black voices) BLM is predominantly focused on injustices and deaths related to police-involved arrests and murders. As horrifying as this murder is, and how important it is for justice to be served, I don't see how it benefits anything to set one against the other.
Another thought: The term "MSM" is obsolete and has been for some time. How many years now has FoxNews been "the most watched news network?" How can they not be "MSM" now themselves? And do any search on the web, where most people except elders get their news, and the pages are filled with right-wing sources. There's absolutely no lack of access to right-wing thought, news, and commentary. For the elders, right-wing talk radio is alive and well, and they've got their cable news Fox right at their remote control.
Having said that: All news is for profit, and will report on any story that will bring clicks and views. It has always been so, back when "above the fold" was the usual way of getting the headline out there. There are sources more truthful than others, but even ones I see as more trustworthy fail too often by seeking "balance" or "both sides" over truth. I've seen this so often wrt Trump, journalists tried too hard to normalize what wasn't normal and they did all of us a disservice. Everyone has a bias, whether implicit or explicit, and even as I sort through multiple sources trying to find individual journalists I can trust, it leaves me wondering if all I've done is found ones who confirm my own biases.
Last edited: