Biden/Harris 2020

quip

BANNED
Banned
No, it was presented as a completed scenario and so the risk can be fully assessed (instead of being estimated in the case of an action that is being proposed) No harm came, therefore the risk involved was zero.

Well, no.
To say you avoided catastrophe is not the same as claiming there was no initial risk.

Are you really that dumb or just trying to argue yourself out of another corner?
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
Yes, that was a bizarre attempt at a failed straw-man. I suppose f-load's own unique brand of racism caught him underfoot!

Yeah, sure seems like he brought race to a religion fight.

I've brought up this survey several times, and no Christian I've brought it up to seems to know what to do with it. It's like they'd thought the enemy was on the other side of the fence when it was really among them all along. It definitely was a revelation to me when I first saw the numbers, because I'd never seen it that way before. I hadn't looked at it that way before.
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Well, no.
To say you avoided catastrophe is not the same as claiming there was no initial risk.

Are you really that dumb or just trying to argue yourself out of another corner?

I knew the slower children would have trouble with this concept and I don't have the time to fully explain it now.

And I don't have any expectation that you'd be able to understand it anyway. :idunno:
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Got it.



Nah.The rest is excuse, the classic "you made me do it."

The important part is where you say you enjoy being abusive.

Of course it is.

The simpleton within you that you've embraced in the past several years is satisfied with the childish and the emotional.

In fact you're unable to think beyond that.
 

Right Divider

Body part
Hmm, wasn't actually doing that anyway RD so some strange way of reading things you have going on there. Tell me, do you condone driving while drunk?

It's against the law ya know...

I don't condone driving while drunk, but it's much safer than intentionally murdering innocent children.
 

annabenedetti

like marbles on glass
trump and his GOP grovelers

Remembering your words when I saw this cartoon this morning, and it's just so perfect:

1867782.jpg
 

quip

BANNED
Banned
I knew the slower children would have trouble with this concept and I don't have the time to fully explain it now.

And I don't have any expectation that you'd be able to understand it anyway. :idunno:

Give it a whirl anyways....:popcorn:
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
I knew the slower children would have trouble with this concept and I don't have the time to fully explain it now.

And I don't have any expectation that you'd be able to understand it anyway. :idunno:

You don't have a concept. You're simply squirming away from this because you know you've got nothing. If you get drunk then your judgement is impaired (and yours isn't too hot at the best of times) and your reaction times are slowed, fact. The effects of alcohol on the brain are documented, fact. You are more at risk of having an accident when your faculties are affected, fact. So when you choose to get drunk and drive a car then you are putting other people and yourself at risk regardless of whether an accident happens or not, fact.

Now, you are dumber than fourteen boxes of rocks if you don't understand that extraordinarily simple premise. You're certainly a selfish, irresponsible dipstick for driving a car while drunk.
 

quip

BANNED
Banned
. So when you choose to get drunk and drive a car then you are putting other people and yourself at risk regardless of whether an accident happens or not, fact.

Didn't you know....doser has a crystal ball. He can assess any risk prior to its event. The talent of which is foreign to our paltry intellect...so suck it up Brain!
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
I don't condone driving while drunk ...



I don't either. I was using it as a scenario to discuss issues with Chair of just laws and unjust laws especially when nobody has been harmed. It seems to have triggered something in artie and he seems compelled to remind everybody that it's a horrible thing to do and that I'm a horrible person for discussing it. Par for the course with artie, I'm afraid. And I see now that it has triggered the inevitable flood of emotional abuse and name-calling from the poor retarded little fellow. :(
 
Last edited:

quip

BANNED
Banned
I don't either. I was using it as a scenario to discuss issues with Chair of just laws and unjust laws especially when nobody has been harmed. It seems to have triggered something in artie and he seems compelled to remind everybody that it's a horrible thing to do and that I'm a horrible person for discussing it. Par for the course with artie, I'm afraid. :(

(Implied from conversation) Drunk driving laws are unjust?!

Do tell....
 

ok doser

lifeguard at the cement pond
Are you serious? Assuming you do not have an intellectual impairment of some kind, your high school teachers should be lined up and shot.

In my county in April, seven people out of 100000 tested positive for the Kung Flu. I was not one of them.

What was my risk in April for testing positive for the Kung Flu?
 
Top