annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
how about explaining it in a way that doesn't make you look a troll?
How about you quit trying so hard to be noticed?
how about explaining it in a way that doesn't make you look a troll?
seriously anna, why not approach the dialogue here in the kind of manner that you used to be able to, instead of alienating the likes of stripe and lon?
in other words, how about you stop being such a weirdo?
yeah, i figgered you'd ignore the advice
oh well, keep on trolling :wave2:
Why in the whole sweet wide world would I ever take advice from the biggest troll on TOL?
why would you take advice from yourself?
beats me :idunno:
Wow....!
What a rant...
Soap-box or what?
Honestly...TLDR
Lesson for today....
Transgenders do not all cross-dress.
Transgenders are sometimes asexual.
Question:
Do you consider transgender, transsexuals and Gays to be ... 'mentally-defective'?
You're still going on about this? I'm not retracting anything I said. You can can complain about it until the cows come home, but it won't change anything.
Nope.
Which has nothing to do with the accusation that I am "forcing" my "religion." I am entitled to my opinion without liberal crybabies accusing me of oppression.
They sanction the execution of unborn babies.Secular laws in the West would never sanction the execution of homosexuals and adulterers.
"Would."It's only a theocratic state that would do that.
You're content being a troll then. :troll:
You make unsubstantiated accusations and when called on them freely admit you're only interested in watching reactions.
So how then? Secular laws in the West would never sanction the execution of homosexuals and adulterers. It's only a theocratic state that would do that.
So if you could change the laws you wouldn't then? What you advocate is the oppression of people, regardless of whether you could bring it about. So stop crying yourself and acting like an idiot calling anna a troll.
He should be out and proud about his past words, then he wouldn't look like such a hypocrite for being pretend-scandalized at my saying "It's not okay to force your religious beliefs on people who don't share them."We shouldn't write laws based on the popularity of an idea. We should write laws based on what is right and what is wrong. It is wrong to force a business to serve when they do not wish to serve. It is the right of every business owner to refuse service as they see fit.
And if homosexuals want to be treated like normal people, they should not act abnormally. Equality comes by conforming to the rules. Those who do not conform should face consequences.
They sanction the execution of unborn babies.
"Would."
You make an accusation and then defend it by saying what "would" happen.
It's called being a troll. How about you quit making silly accusations and engage rationally? :up:
It's not OK to be gay.
He's deflecting from his vote that homosexuals should be executed. And from his post saying that gays didn't deserve equality unless they followed "the rules." (Hint: Christian rules.)
He should be out and proud about his past words, then he wouldn't look like such a hypocrite for being pretend-scandalized at my saying "It's not okay to force your religious beliefs on people who don't share them."
Seriously. He's gone a little nutty over it.
We know you're a troll. You've said.I'm content watching you twist yourself into a pretzel.
Show us where I'm "forcing" my "religion" and you'll have the basis of an actual accusation.It's not okay to force your religious beliefs on people who don't share them."
Facts, remember?The abortion debate is a separate issue.
"If" and "would" do not justify your accusations.It stands to reason that were such a state implemented you'd be all in favour of it and forcing it on the population as a whole.
Except that these were not your accusations.It's in no way being a troll to point that out.
People can't choose who they have sex with? :AMR:It's not like people have a choice in it anyway.
Facts, remember?
The government you are happy to have endorses the murder of unborn children. Pretending you know what kind of government I would like does nothing to substantiate your claims that I am "forcing" my "religion."
It's especially ironic given the facts on the ground.
And by "ironic," I mean hypocritical.
"If" and "would" do not justify your accusations.
Except that these were not your accusations.
People can't choose who they have sex with? :AMR: