"Biblical" refers to His word. If it isn't from His mouth it isn't orthodox, you simpering ninny!
Baking Cakes for Homosexual Couples
- Thread starter Volts
- Start date
- Status
Where is it written that everything of God is written?
Nowhere in the Bible does it state that that the Bible is the only thing permissible or true. Sola scriptura is not commanded within it.
Protestants neglect that completely, and dubiously, even though the Church has dropped it on you for a good long time now.
If God had anything to add He would. But for now, anything that contradicts His finished word is unorthodox heresy. And the RCC contradicts His word.
Please explain where this happened.
Would you like to tackle these issues then? Choose any one of the issues that is an RCC doctrine not found in the Bible; you know what they are, and let's see if it contradicts what is actually in there...
Why does Jesus reference "it is written" over and over and over?
It could. It could also mean that he doesn't care if a couple of perverts engage in perverted acts.
There are those for it, there are those against it, and there are apathetic people who just don't care either way. Therefore your question cannot be answered unless we actually know who the baker is.
musterion
Well-known member
I already proved you're wrong on idolatry, doubly proved by your failure to even try to reply to it. You're wrong on this, too.
Because it's written :idunno:
There is no biblical reference implying that the scriptures are the only thing of God.
That's not even what Martin Luther, THE FOUNDER OF SOLA SCRIPTURA, meant for it to be!
He simply went by the notion that the scriptures are all one needs to be righteous- nothing about your SOLO biblical nonsense.
He even included the Apocrypha, but you all went and disposed of all that in your ignorance after he passed and today are hardly even legitimately Protestant in doctrine or theology. There's no way to even describe you all anymore.
:freak: Yall went full retard
Yes, its written and He appeals to the authority of the actual word of God, to show He fulfills what is written showing His authority in a way we can test to be certain.
Keeps false doctrines at bay. Thats WHY it was written.
But then, the authority of Jesus was passed on the apostles, who didn't write everything they taught, but gave it to their successors. It was passed on to the Church, not to individuals- the authority was not meant to rest exclusively in a book.
Hence, the Apostolic Office of the Church. The Pope is the successor of Peter, and this is a virtually unchallenged fact by everybody including the Eastern Orthodox who split and the Anglicans. It's only anti-Catholics who deny that inevitability.
You want the Church spoken of in Matthew 16, the biblical, historical Church? There it is :wave:
musterion
Well-known member
You can't even see how dangerous and stupid that proposition is, can you.
And who told you that?
Who told you the nonsense you speak?
'Who told me' is history itself. The Church fulfilled the prophecies, it's the biblical and historical Christian Church ~broseph~
So you have no evidence, let alone actual proof. As I expected.Who told you the nonsense you speak?
'Who told me' is history itself. The Church fulfilled the prophecies, it's the biblical and historical Christian Church ~broseph~
The Church existing is my proof. What other church is it going to be?
Circular reasoning.
- Status