Lay out the OP so that it can be quoted from next time.
*There's more than one church mentioned in the first bullet of the OP
*The 12 sent to the lost sheep of the house of Israel in M, M, L and J Matthew 10:5-6 KJV and the Lord Himself to them too (Matthew 15:24 KJV, Romans 15:8 KJV)
*of which no one today has any (1 Corinthians 13:8-10 KJV).
*Paul was given the dispensation of the grace of God to us Gentiles (Ephesians 3:1-6 KJV)
*We follow Paul (1 Corinthians 4:15-16 KJV)
Yep! The Pope is not OUR kind of guy.
The Holy See descends from Peter's own supreme pastorship over our Lord's Church. Today's supreme pastor holds the same office Peter held way back in AD 33.
I know it. He's got spunk, that one, no? Pow!Today?? That guy? I don't think so! You should of seen him the other day, going off on some guy from another country? He looked like he was about to go all "Rocky" on that guy.
Nope.The Holy See descends from Peter's own supreme pastorship over our Lord's Church. Today's supreme pastor holds the same office Peter held way back in AD 33.
Nope.
Paul is the apostle of the Gentiles (Romans 11:13 KJV), committed a dispensation of the gospel (1 Corinthians 9:17 KJV) and later given the dispensation of the grace of God to us Gentiles (Ephesians 3:1-6 KJV). Paul filled up that which was behind of the afflictions of Christ in his flesh for Christ's body's sake, which is the church (Colossians 1:24-27 KJV). We follow Paul (1 Corinthians 4:15-16 KJV).
I like your faith.Galatians 2
7 But on the contrary, when they saw that the gospel for the uncircumcised had been committed to me, as the gospel for the circumcised was to Peter
I belong to Paul's church, not Peter. Peter has a good gig, make no mistake about it. He had to put up with hell on earth because of his testimony, and for it, he will be rewarded.
The Holy See descends from Peter's own supreme pastorship over our Lord's Church. Today's supreme pastor holds the same office Peter held way back in AD 33.
Please explain how this is relevant in a body of people where there is neither Jew nor Gentile.Peter was a married Jew. Have all popes secretly been married Jews?
Paul himself we know consecrated bishops, among them Timothy and Titus, to whom he wrote epistles, which we have preserved for us, by that early Church.
I have no proof of this
Please explain how this is relevant in a body of people where there is neither Jew nor Gentile.
You can say that again.