It appears that there is a difference between a right given by God, and rights being respected by men.
As an example, a right given by God might be freedom of thought, or of physical autonomy, which no man can usurp or deny. Whereas a right that men can disregard and subjugate, such as the right to life and liberty, would not likely be a right conferred by God, would it? If so, that would make men more powerful than God, as men can negate and deny these right to each other.
Men like to imagine that their own idea of an unalienable right is the same as a God given right. But in truth this is almost never the case. It's really just men presuming that their own idea if righteousness is God sanctioned. So as to justify forcing their idea of righteousness on everyone else. And yet, although we can constrain and control the behavior of others, we cannot constrain or control their hearts, or their minds, or their spirit. So I think it's these that are God given and unalienably and rightfully ours. Even though we are constantly trying to usurp, deny, and control them in each other.