I find pictures of homos hanging all over each other offensive, period. Anime or not.Personally.... I find avatars featuring gay anime characters offensive.
I find pictures of homos hanging all over each other offensive, period. Anime or not.Personally.... I find avatars featuring gay anime characters offensive.
No it isn't. Gay yuri, or gay yaoi is redundant.Gay anime is a bit redundant.
I find pictures of homos hanging all over each other offensive, period. Anime or not.
At least it's not dead fetus :thumb:
What if a pregnant women who wants an abortion sees one of those graphic signs and changes her mind and decides to keep the baby. Would that change your mind about the graphic signs?
No. I don't approve of graphic imagery in propaganda (propaganda as in the technical meaning, not the negative connotation).
Ahhhh... so you like to see your prey before you kill it and not after. Is that what you are saying?Requiring an ultrasound before an abortion, now that is something I could get behind. I read that in a thread around here, and I greatly like the sound of it.
Ahhhh... so you like to see your prey before you kill it and not after. Is that what you are saying?
Your worries about propaganda (which it isn't, it is the truth) are a bigger concern than the life of a child?
You are a real loser.
Yet if after viewing the baby via an ultra-sound the mother still wanted to murder the baby you support that, right?And I meant ultrasound as a deterrent, a way to awaken the mother to the humanity of their child and make them realize their mistake. I also meant, not Right before the actual procedure, more like, the attendants have to check them over and preform an ultrasound before even really getting to the discussion of why they've come to the clinic.
What is a pregnant women who wants an abortion sees one of those graphic signs and changes her mind and decides to keep the baby. Would that change your mind about the graphic signs?
No. I don't approve of graphic imagery in propaganda (propaganda as in the technical meaning, not the negative connotation).
Requiring an ultrasound before an abortion, now that is something I could get behind. I read that in a thread around here, and I greatly like the sound of it.
Your worries about propaganda (which it isn't, it is the truth) are a bigger concern than the life of a child?
You are a real loser.
Your maturity is quite astounding, I'm totally blown away by your words.
I never said I wasn't concerned about the life of the child, I clearly gave an alternative way to potentially save the life of a child.
see the above post and read all of it this time.
Yet if after viewing the baby via an ultra-sound the mother still wanted to murder the baby you support that, right?
I support the right to choose [to murder one's own preborn baby]
I support the right to choose, but am against abortion. It's a rather contradictory point of view, but there you have it. And I'm just not going to debate this any more, this isn't really the thread for this.
There's the shock of the century. No one saw that coming.
Contradictory is right. You bought into the abortion-->"choice=freedom" lie. It is not a choice, it is murder and you condone it.
Babies don't want to be ripped apart if they had the "choice".
Funny, this from a socialist who WANTS you to pay tyrannically high taxes buts reserves the right to "choose" to murder an innocent baby.
Public school anyone?
Don't edit my quotes to make it look like I said things I didn't.
I added a phrase in brackets to clarify what you were talking about. I wasn't trying to fool anyone; that's why I used brackets. It's common practice in publishing.
Surely you weren't talking about one's right to choose generally, right? Weren't you referring to a person's so-called "right" to choose to hire an abortionist to murder her pre-born baby?
Murder is supposed to be risky. Abortion, like all murder, should be a capital crime.If a girl is so determined to kill their unborn child, and there aren't clinics openly available and regulated, her life could be lost as well due to seedy back door practices. When invasive medical procedures go underground, things get worse, not better.
Maybe we should de-criminalize all murder. Then Planned Parenthood could offer to murder people of all ages. Then we could try to talk some sense into those murderers who would otherwise commit their crimes in secret, and possibly get hurt or killed in the process.Where will you protest and prevent murder, if the clinics are hidden, hmm?
You are ignorant. Pregnant women and girls are often pressured into getting abortions by their mothers, boyfriends, or rapists. Planned Parenthood could care less. They even support China's forced-abortion policies.What if the girl is being forced to do the procedure: an underground clinic won't care, they're doing illegal things already. A clinic, like Planned Parenthood, is expected to report such abuse, and do what the mother wants, not what some pimp/sexual abuser/jerk lover wants.