FYI: I added "archive" to the title of this thread. It's a "keeper". 
However, this is clearly stated in Scripture.Lee: I agree that God is not working in concert with the devil, however, the devil serves God’s good purposes.
Philetus: Your continued insistence that somehow the evil that the devil does and causes through temptation in and through the actions of evil men is after all the will of God is so contrary to the Good News it is pathetic.
Yes, his purpose was to cause Paul to sin.The devil is a liar; the author of lies. He is out to destroy God’s Good work.
Yes, because his purpose is different, it is a purpose to harm.He will be destroyed; not rewarded by God for his help in accomplishing some ‘greater good’.
As in keeping Paul humble?Evil makes NO CONTRUBITION to the work of God in the world!
But I wasn’t speaking of temptation, but affliction:What I find comforting is that with every temptation to do evil God is not ‘pulling off some greater good’ as you hold, but is rather providing a way of escape; a divine alternative to the very evil that you claim is God’s will anyway.
God was wrong in this statement, then?Patman said:The people of Eze. 21:3-4 were not righteous.
Yet the Lord said his sword was to be unsheathed against everyone from south to north, meaning (as the Open View insists that we take the plain sense of verses) everyone.But as life goes, the righteous are effected. But God told the righteous, in other parts of this story, what to do to make it easier on them.
Certainly!GOD IS FOR THE RIGHTEOUS LEE!
Yet God says “I [this is God acting here] am going to cut off the righteous and the wicked.”Surely you can see God was bringing this to the wicked, and the innocent bystanders were simply unintentional but bound to be effected.
Yet “the trouble the Lord had brought on him” is what we read, and what we must subscribe to.Lee, I agree that God brings disaster on the wicked. NOT the innocent, not Job. Satan did that to Job independently of God.
I agree, affliction to the righteous is sent to refine them.So that is the conclusion you should take on. God punishes the wicked, and not the innocent.
But not if their afflictions do them good.To you, the fatherless are just as cheated out of justice and goodness as the wicked are, by God's decree.
Agreed…God rewards good with good. Not good with evil…
Yet evil made a contribution to the work of God in the world here, did it not?Philetus said:As for the ‘thorn in the flesh’-- that messenger from Satan -- God did not send it, nor did God remove it. That gives your theology fits. Doesn't it?
Because the point at issue is clearest, I think, in the area of unjust suffering.How can you speak of suffering, Lee, without also speaking of temptation?
Certainly the devil's intent is not good, but his deed to bring this about results in good:The intent and purpose of the enemy is to get us to curse God and die. How can anyone see that as good?
Why though, did God not take away the suffering Paul had, the thorn, if he did not cause it, and it was not his intent?... and that with every temptation to accuse God of tempting us by causing suffering, it is God who provides a way of escape.
As in the cross, my friend, as in the cross.It is God’s grace in our weakness that is sufficient, not some contrived doctrine of ‘God causes evil for some greater good.”
lee_merrill said:God was wrong in this statement, then?
Ezekiel 21:3-4 This is what the Lord says: I am against you. I will draw my sword from its scabbard and cut off from you both the righteous and the wicked. Because I am going to cut off the righteous and the wicked, my sword will be unsheathed against everyone from south to north.
Yet the Lord said his sword was to be unsheathed against everyone from south to north, meaning (as the Open View insists that we take the plain sense of verses) everyone.
Philetus said:
Lee,
God is for all of us; every last one of us. But, sin still pays a wage.
As for the ‘thorn in the flesh’-- that messenger from Satan -- God did not send it, nor did God remove it. That gives your theology fits. Doesn't it?
5 I will boast about a man like that, but I will not boast about myself, except about my weaknesses. 6 Even if I should choose to boast, I would not be a fool, because I would be speaking the truth. But I refrain, so no one will think more of me than is warranted by what I do or say. 7 To keep me from becoming conceited because of these surpassingly great revelations, there was given me a thorn in my flesh, a messenger of Satan, to torment me. 8 Three times I pleaded with the Lord to take it away from me. 9 But he said to me, "My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness." Therefore I will boast all the more gladly about my weaknesses, so that Christ's power may rest on me. 10 That is why, for Christ's sake, I delight in weaknesses, in insults, in hardships, in persecutions, in difficulties. For when I am weak, then I am strong.
11 I have made a fool of myself, but you drove me to it. I ought to have been commended by you, for I am not in the least inferior to the "super-apostles," even though I am nothing. 12 The things that mark an apostle--signs, wonders and miracles--were done among you with great perseverance.
How can you speak of suffering, Lee, without also speaking of temptation? Paul’s temptation was to challenge God --- deny God’s goodness in his suffering. Because of his ‘weakness’ Paul’s credibility was being called into question. Sound familiar? But, suffering is the natural result of living in a fallen world where the enemy of God threatens the very fabric of creation by driving a wedge between God and His creatures, seducing them to question and blame God (as your theology so cleverly and inventively does). The intent and purpose of the enemy is to get us to curse God and die. How can anyone see that as good?
Paul’s perseverance under trial is expressly Christian (Christ like) because Paul still lived in the world and boasted not of his overcoming power but the power of Christ in him. Paul didn’t confess ‘the big head’ because of the revelations given him. He didn't have to. He was saying that living and suffering in the world like anyone else keeps us humble before God unless we cave into the temptation to question God’s loving restraint of his wrath and power and minimize His grace. We can rejoice in the midst of trials and suffering because we know that no matter what the enemy throws at us, God is for us and will not allow more to be thrown at us than WE can bear and that with every temptation to accuse God of tempting us by causing suffering, it is God who provides a way of escape.
Your position is undoubtedly the same kind of bad reasoning that provoked the response, “but you drove me to it” and no doubt added to the hardship of Paul in continuing ‘with great perseverance’ the work of the Gospel among the Corinthians. It is the same kind of thinking that causes much hardship and confusion among people today. As servants of the Gospel, it is perseverance in spite of our weakness that gives our faith, not our suffering, meaning. It is God’s grace in our weakness that is sufficient, not some contrived doctrine of ‘God causes evil for some greater good.”
Philetus
patman said:Good post.
It is as simple as just reading, isn't it?
Philetus said:
Thanks patman. It really is. But many are so clouded in their thinking that they can’t read a simple statement or verse without all the baggage of preconceived doctrine. I think it was godrulz that warned me early on to “never underestimate the power of preexistent doctrines.” How right he was. Keep up the good postings. I enjoy your stuff.
:grave:
Philetus
patman said:Jeremiah 20:4
For thus says the LORD: ‘Behold, I will make you a terror to yourself and to all your friends; and they shall fall by the sword of their enemies, and your eyes shall see it. I will give all Judah into the hand of the king of Babylon, and he shall carry them captive to Babylon and slay them with the sword.
2 Kings 25
21 Then the king of Babylon struck them and put them to death at Riblah in the land of Hamath. Thus Judah was carried away captive from its own land. 22 Then he made Gedaliah the son of Ahikam, the son of Shaphan, governor over the people who remained in the land of Judah, whom Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon had left.
25 But it happened in the seventh month that Ishmael the son of Nethaniah, the son of Elishama, of the royal family, came with ten men and struck and killed Gedaliah, the Jews, as well as the Chaldeans who were with him at Mizpah. 26 And all the people, small and great, and the captains of the armies, arose and went to Egypt; for they were afraid of the Chaldeans.
I didn't ignore anything, you ignored the verse:Berean Todd said:All of Judah was given into the hand of Babylon. Just because they did not remove them all to another land, you are ignoring the fact that all of Judah became a part of the Babylonian Empire. It doesn't matter where they lived, they were still in Babylonian rule. You did not post verses 23-24, but what happened between the 2 excerts you did make from 2 Kings is simply that some of the officers were affraid of Chaldean rule and decided to run away. Nothing in the prophecy says that no one would run away or escape from the Babylonian rule. God did give all of Judah into the hands of the Babylonians, for many years there was no longer an independant Jewish state at this point.
Doesn't this show that God caused this? And weren't the Babylonians sinful?patman said:Jeremiah 20:4
For thus says the LORD: ‘Behold, I will make you a terror to yourself and to all your friends; and they shall fall by the sword of their enemies, and your eyes shall see it. I will give all Judah into the hand of the king of Babylon, and he shall carry them captive to Babylon and slay them with the sword.
lee_merrill said:Doesn't this show that God caused this? And weren't the Babylonians sinful?
You see, saying "out of context!" does not consitute an argument, and the Bible is clear about God causing sinful deeds.
Blessings,
Lee
lee_merrill said:Doesn't this show that God caused this? And weren't the Babylonians sinful?
You see, saying "out of context!" does not consitute an argument, and the Bible is clear about God causing sinful deeds.
Blessings,
Lee