it was an attempt to ride the success of pulp fiction, iirc
flawed in many ways, it is noteworthy in my mind for stellar performances by steve buscemi, christopher lloyd and a truly evil christopher walken
and a classic bit part by cheadle :thumb:
btw, i was driving home last night after i'd posted that "the token black guy" bit when it struck me that nick fury is played by a black guy :doh:
So because you thought this was a good flick that should speak for us all? I can say after seeing the trailer and knowing that I would have to endure the rap crap that passes for music I knew I wasn't interested. I would say look at the stats, "The Revenant" which had best actor sold $300 million in tickets where "Straight Outta of Compton" only sold $60.2 Million, I think that shows why right there but, I guess the Oscar should have been awarded because of race instead of merit...Lame!
That's it, it's largely symptomatic of a larger problem. But as a highly-visible part of that system, they have a larger-than-most responsibility to do something about it.
I think you can have a racist system in which no individual participant has to make a single, explicitly racist decision. I'm don't think that's exactly what's going on in Hollywood. I think there are people making casting decisions based on race and expectations about what people want to see, accurate or not. And it's certainly true that a lot of white people react pretty dramatically when a black actor is cast in a traditionally white roll. But the Oscars itself may be unwitting racism. And the only way to change that sort of system is to call it out. The people inside the system don't want it to be that way necessarily, and they certainly don't want to be seen that way. And it looks like there are some changes coming because of the publicity.
This is why the world is stupid.
Black actors deserve what they get - nothing
Is he token too? :chuckle:
Box office gross and Oscar wins rarely coincide, but the better argument would have been Creed, which did well with the public and was critically well received, better than a number of films that were nominated...I think Revenant had the weakest critical reception, which is why I never believed it would take home the Oscar. Seemed to me it would either be Room or Big Short. The best reviewed film of the year, curiously enough, was Mad Max. But you knew there was no way the Academy was going to vote that in.So because you thought this was a good flick that should speak for us all? I can say after seeing the trailer and knowing that I would have to endure the rap crap that passes for music I knew I wasn't interested. I would say look at the stats, "The Revenant" which had best actor sold $300 million in tickets where "Straight Outta of Compton" only sold $60.2 Million, I think that shows why right there but, I guess the Oscar should have been awarded because of race instead of merit...Lame!
Why do they have a larger responsibility than most? Wouldn't the primary responsibility be with those who are creating the films?
Depending on the case I can understand that. And I tend to think the primary way black actors get jobs shouldn't be by changing existing characters to be black. Then again, I'm not sure what percentage of films are based on existing stories and what are original.
Because the represent the pinnacle of success in Hollywood, and they are powerful enough to drive at least some decisions in how movies are made.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oscar_bait
And yet, white actors play non-white characters all the time.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_films_featuring_whitewashed_roles
And yet, white actors play non-white characters all the time.
it was a response to your observation:
And yet, white actors play non-white characters all the time.
Any your point is relative to what exactly?Someone help SOD. He's stuck in a loop of irrelevant observations again.
Could you maybe add some connecting argument to show the relevance of what you're saying.
He was showing the utter irrelevance of what you were saying.